Nice work Vincent! Will promote it at the weekly newsletters :)
Matthias
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
On Friday, February 25, 2011 08:45:09 PM Steve Bennett wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 11:30 AM, Vincent Pottier wrote:
> > Make some lobying to get it included in the addon !
>
> Would you like to give us an introduction to this thing, and why it is useful?
Microformats are a way of marking up
On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 11:30 AM, Vincent Pottier wrote:
> Make some lobying to get it included in the addon !
Would you like to give us an introduction to this thing, and why it is useful?
Steve
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lis
Hi all,
The excelent addon operator for firefox (using the microformats) ignored
OpenStreetMap.
https://addons.mozilla.org/fr/firefox/addon/operator/
I have written a little hack for that. See :
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:FrViPofm/Operator
Making some changes, the new version of t
On 25-2-2011 22:02, Jochen Topf wrote:
We have a server that has planet file kept current each day for Taginfo.
Maybe it can do the coastline check, too. It only has PBF files, though
which the coastline checker doesn't understand. But we could work around
that or change it. Storage should also
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 09:24:19PM +0100, Lennard wrote:
> >Can we get this going again? What exactly is needed?
>
> A server with sufficient storage and bandwidth to process a weekly
> planet, daily diffs, and many hours of single task processing per
> coastline run.
We have a server that has pl
On 25-2-2011 17:03, Jochen Topf wrote:
The coastline error checker says:
Last update of coastline errors: Wed Apr 14 13:19:17 UTC 2010
It also says it needs new hosting. I guess thats the problem.
The osm.org tile server generates its own coastline shapefiles. It
doesn't use the ones from the
There has been a confirmation that a major international humanitarian
organisation (other than the Red Cross) is looking into using OSM for
its deployment in Libya.
Jean-Guilhem
Le 24/02/2011 17:09, Jean-Guilhem Cailton a écrit :
> Of course yes, Libya does deserve emergency mapping.
> This had
On Fri, 2011-02-25 at 20:01 +0100, Jochen Topf wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Falmouth:
> http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=50.15364&lon=-5.0639&zoom=17&layers=M
> Looks ok now in this zoom level. Still some errors if you zoom in.
>
> I had a look at it again and marked some tile manually as dirty and I
> get
Hi!
Falmouth:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=50.15364&lon=-5.0639&zoom=17&layers=M
Looks ok now in this zoom level. Still some errors if you zoom in.
I had a look at it again and marked some tile manually as dirty and I get the
correct rendering then. So the problem seems not to be the coastli
On Fri, 25 Feb 2011 18:35:41 -, David Groom wrote:
> David
>
> the way you refer to was last edited on 1 Feb 2011, [..]
You probably haven't read my whole message :)
The last changes are just added nodes, there is no change in the shape of the
coastline. The last changes in shape happened in
- Original Message -
From: "David Paleino"
To:
Sent: Friday, February 25, 2011 5:57 PM
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Coastline updates
David
the way you refer to was last edited on 1 Feb 2011, I would not necessarily
expect to see the results of those changes reflected yet in the coast
Is there any reason to still have the NPE layer accessible from the editors.
It was useful in the pre-OS/Bing days but seems like a liability now?
Kevin
On 25 February 2011 17:47, Ed Loach wrote:
> > > I have edited coastlines in Cornwall last summer and they are
> still
> > not
> > > updated
On Fri, 25 Feb 2011 17:39:46 -, David Groom wrote:
> > I have edited coastlines in Cornwall last summer and they are still not
> > updated on the main map. (Easy to see because the border and coastline
> > share the same location in the data but show up differently on the map.)
>
> Can you ga
> > I have edited coastlines in Cornwall last summer and they are
still
> not
> > updated on the main map. (Easy to see because the border and
> coastline
> > share the same location in the data but show up differently on
the
> map.)
> >
>
> Can you gave an example location?
I had a quick look ar
- Original Message -
From: "Jochen Topf"
To: "OSM Talk"
Sent: Friday, February 25, 2011 4:03 PM
Subject: [OSM-talk] Coastline updates
Hi!
I have edited coastlines in Cornwall last summer and they are still not
updated on the main map. (Easy to see because the border and coastlin
- Original Message -
From: "Jochen Topf"
To: "OSM Talk"
Sent: Friday, February 25, 2011 4:03 PM
Subject: [OSM-talk] Coastline updates
Hi!
I have edited coastlines in Cornwall last summer and they are still not
updated on the main map. (Easy to see because the border and coastlin
2011/2/25 Dan Putler :
> Yep, OSM data that needs attribution. The blog entry indicates that OSM is
> the data source, so the attribution there is correct. While this is off
> topic, I will say that I was really impressed by the ESRI JS toolkit (liked
> the scale bar), and how snappy the response i
2011/2/25 Zhijie Shen :
> On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 1:16 AM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
> wrote:
>> display them as an overlay. We cannot (AFAIK) import those coordinates
>> into OSM because we believe that they were mainly created from
>> Googlemaps hence constitute a derived database [1].
> Yes, I agree
Hi!
I have edited coastlines in Cornwall last summer and they are still not
updated on the main map. (Easy to see because the border and coastline
share the same location in the data but show up differently on the map.)
The coastline error checker says:
Last update of coastline errors: Wed Apr 14
Hello, whoots can only be used with WMS servers which support EPSG:900913
(spherical mercator) I think?
The PNOA server does not support it
Here is a full request:
http://www.idee.es/wms/PNOA/PNOA?REQUEST=GetMap&SERVICE=WMS&VERSION=1.1.1&LAYERS=pnoa&SRS=EPSG:4326&BBOX=-2.9364084238270007,43.262
21 matches
Mail list logo
