On 11/19/2012 09:10 PM, Michael Krämer wrote:
Hi,
using OSM inspector's coastline view I came across a rather large
missing segement of the coastline. It turned out that a new user has
accidentially deleted it. He agreed to revert the change and I
volunteered to take care of it.
As it turns out
I like my eTrex 20 but it hasn't been error free. Most of the time it
provides good tracks. However at times it is off more than what I expect.
(the tracks to and from the same location should be close. At times they
differ more than 10m.) I have lost one long hike. It recorded just the last
half,
2012/11/19 Michael Krämer :
> So I tried to only undelete the way for the coastline using the "undelete"
> plugin. Trying to do so gives an error on upload as the way references
> deleted nodes. Sounds reasonable but doesn't really help.
Had a similar problem, this is the ticket:
https://josm.ope
Has anyone compared the etrex20 to the gpsmap 60Csx regarding
positional accuracy? Recently got strange problems on my 60Csx (can
turn it on, but when turned off it won't switch on again unless I
remove the batteries for a second, and I suspect it also continues to
consume electricity while "turned
Mikael
The original changeset affected both coastline and administrative boundaries.
We see that 92 ways were modified in the last changeset. From this changeset,
the better and less damaging solution is probably to identify and undelete ways
one by one with the Undelete Plugin in
JOSM.
Pierr
Do you have .osm extracts for the area? A slice from an old regional
extract (or a planet for that matter) would give you the old data.
What area is this?
Cheers,
-Jaakko
On Nov 19, 2012 3:11 PM, "Michael Krämer" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> using OSM inspector's coastline view I came across a rather large
Michael
Looking at ways in the changesets, I found that they were undeleted. It seems
that Changeset 13937676 by user zors1843 already reverted all of this.
Pierre
>
> De : Michael Krämer
>À : talk@openstreetmap.org
>Envoyé le : Lundi 19 novembre 2012 15h1
Hi,
using OSM inspector's coastline view I came across a rather large
missing segement of the coastline. It turned out that a new user has
accidentially deleted it. He agreed to revert the change and I
volunteered to take care of it.
As it turns out the changeset (13910261) included more cha
On Nov 19, 2012 7:32 PM, "Tim Waters" wrote:
>
> The supplied cable is a small one, about 1ft long, if that helps.
Same here, I have a 20 and it only mounts with the supplied cable which is
about 15cm.
Kevin
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
Hello,
I have a new etrex20 also.
On 18 November 2012 03:02, Banick, Robert wrote:
> Hi Sebastian,
>
> It certainly sounds like your USB Controller is dead, but here's a thought:
> Garmins can be finicky about the cables they're used with. Are you using the
> USB cable that came with the Etrex 2
In prep for this year's pan latin american Desarrollando America Latina
hackathon Vitor George from @mapaslivres and myself will host OSM webcasts in
Spanish and Portuguese:
http://mapbox.com/blog/talleres-mapeo-desarrollando-america-latina/
If you know of communities or individuals who would
It's a bit different in a number of ways. I would summarize the difference
(based on checking both out some time ago, things may have changed) by
saying that:
* Field Papers gives you space to write on
* Walking Papers allows smoother printing of multi page prints (2x2, 4x4).
Field papers seem to u
On 19 November 2012 16:41, hbogner wrote:
> On 19.11.2012. 15:31, Sébastien Pierrel wrote:
>
>> Hi list,
>>
>> I've just noticed that the walking-papers website is down. Are the
>> admins/maintainers aware of this? How to get in touch with them?
>>
>>
> Try http://fieldpapers.org/
> It's new wers
On 19.11.2012. 15:31, Sébastien Pierrel wrote:
Hi list,
I've just noticed that the walking-papers website is down. Are the
admins/maintainers aware of this? How to get in touch with them?
--
Cheers,
/Seb.
Try http://fieldpapers.org/
It's new wersion of walking papers.
_
Hi list,
I've just noticed that the walking-papers website is down. Are the
admins/maintainers aware of this? How to get in touch with them?
--
Cheers,
/Seb.
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
I always read that paragraph as something transitional. But apparently
transition doesn't happen over 1,5 years, maybe 15 years is more realistic.
Although I'd expect another proposal would have emerged and possibly
approved by then... Hopefully one that allows for route relations to be
composed of
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 11:04 AM, Martin Koppenhöfer
> Reading the comments on platform for bus stops in this thread it didn't look
> as if "converting" will ever be the way to go (if this implies deleting
> highway=bus_stop tags).
Remember this wiki content:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/P
In that case I don't see the usefulness of adding public_transport=platform
to the stops and I'll simply ignore that part of the wiki page from now on.
Status quo rules, but that's all right.
Cheers,
Polyglot
2012/11/19 Martin Koppenhöfer
>
>
> Am 19/nov/2012 um 00:16 schrieb Jo :
>
> > When,
Am 19/nov/2012 um 00:16 schrieb Jo :
> When, some distant day in the future, public_transport=platform is taken into
> account and rendered, I'll start converting them when I touch them to change
> other tags, which is what I thought I could start doing now, since it's been
> 1,5 years since
19 matches
Mail list logo
