On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 9:57 AM, Jonathan Bennett
wrote:
>
> Actually I think you've misunderstood:
>
> You've said these are Junk Tags, and I think everyone has agreed with
> you on that. However people have also pointed out that they are probably
> attached to Junk Data.
How about if I summari
The weekly round-up of OSM news, issue # 239, is now available online in
English, giving as always a summary of all things happening in the
openstreetmap world: http://www.weeklyosm.eu
Enjoy!
--
## Manfred Reiter - -
## www.weeklyOSM.eu
___
talk mailin
fixme=yes is an interesting one socially. It's a bit like tiger:reviewed=no
If there's an obvious problem, I might feel confident to fix the issue and
clear the tag out. But for most nodes I might be unsure what's wrong, or
not be confident I know 100% about the object. Thus the fixme=yes sits
th
On 25/02/2015, Jonathan Bennett wrote:
> On 25/02/2015 17:23, Bryce Nesbitt wrote:
>> Hold on, you may have misunderstood.
>
> Actually I think you've misunderstood:
Being the thread starter, I doubt that Bryce has misunderstood the
point of the thread.
> You've said these are Junk Tags, and I
On 25/02/2015 17:23, Bryce Nesbitt wrote:
> Hold on, you may have misunderstood.
Actually I think you've misunderstood:
You've said these are Junk Tags, and I think everyone has agreed with
you on that. However people have also pointed out that they are probably
attached to Junk Data.
This means
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 1:10 AM, SomeoneElse wrote:
> On 25/02/2015 05:00, Bryce Nesbitt wrote:
>
>> Any fixme in wide use I'm not interested in deleting.
>>
>
> I'd strongly oppose the mechanical deletion of "low volume" fixme values.
> Mappers local to me often use individually worded fixmes de
In the case of Nashville TN, where I live, a mass removal of Tiger data
would erase most of the map.
--
John F. Eldredge -- j...@jfeldredge.com
"Darkness cannot drive out darkness; only light can do that. Hate cannot
drive out hate; only love can do that." Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.
On Feb
On 25/02/2015, sly (sylvain letuffe) wrote:
>> But mass-removing that import's fixmes
>
> I meant : "mass-removing the import's objects"
Ah well, that's more drastic and a bit off-topic ? But yeah, I'm sure
nobody will mind the mass-removal of, say, Tiger data in the US, which
happens to be the o
brycenesbitt wrote
> It's also possible to turn some of those like
> "could_be_dunes_or_beach" into notes, rather than FIXME.
-1
Don't push dust under another carpet
-
--
sly, contact direct : sylvain /a\ letuffe o r g
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Sletuffe
--
View this message
> But mass-removing that import's fixmes
I meant : "mass-removing the import's objects"
--
sly, direct contact : sylv...@letuffe.org
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Sletuffe
-
--
sly, contact direct : sylvain /a\ letuffe o r g
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Sletuffe
--
On 25/02/2015, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> 2015-02-25 11:07 GMT+01:00 moltonel 3x Combo :
>> * fixme=yes
>> Provides no information
>
> -1, it indicates a certain overaverage probability of some (not further
> specified) problem
It can also indicate a tagging error (as in "adding this fixme wa
On 25/02/2015, sly (sylvain letuffe) wrote:
> On mercredi 25 février 2015, you wrote:
>> +1, in any case it seems more likely that the problems gets fixed with a
>> fixme tag than without.
>
> -1
> I do think this is is only true in a short term view.
> Push that reasoning to the extrem, should we
On 25/02/2015, sly (sylvain letuffe) wrote:
> I do also agree with Frederic, imports of external data not conflated added
> with some "fixme=please fix my bad import by surveying it on the ground"
> should be remove alltogether. Good integration should be done at import time
> and should'nt rely o
On 25/02/2015 07:01, Frederik Ramm wrote:
+1 to all that.
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
On mercredi 25 février 2015, you wrote:
> +1, in any case it seems more likely that the problems gets fixed with a
> fixme tag than without.
-1
I do think this is is only true in a short term view.
Push that reasoning to the extrem, should we add fixme=* tags for every QA
tool report, people will
2015-02-25 11:07 GMT+01:00 moltonel 3x Combo :
> > How will removing any "fixme" tag make the actual _data_ in OSM better?
> > It'll just make it harder for people editing it to determine what is
> > good data and what isn't.
>
> +1
>
I'm willing to believe that a particular fixme value is useles
I agree with Tordanik that automated addition of fixme=* tags to previously
existing objects (just like set better denotation on natural=tree) is
counter productive, and not only displays warning on JOSM, but make my days
on the ground worst as my osmand is showing non human asked corrections.
(Bet
To me, fixme tags always come with the implied 'I don't know, it needs
surveying from a more knowledgeable local mapper' so I don't think a
widespread mechanical edit will help.
As others have said: What's the problem with these tags? As they're not
harming the database. How will deleting them
On 25/02/2015, SomeoneElse wrote:
> On 25/02/2015 05:00, Bryce Nesbitt wrote:
>> Get rid:
>> fixme=check/adjust␣position␣and/or␣merge␣with␣existing␣stop␣if␣exists
>> fixme=type_of_palm
>> fixme=imported_to_be_checked
>> FIXME=stream␣attribute␣data␣missing
>>
>> Keep:
>> fixme=continue
>> fixme=pos
Unsure how that will resolve any of the problems.
On 25/02/2015 05:02, Bryce Nesbitt wrote:
It's also possible to turn some of those like
"could_be_dunes_or_beach" into notes, rather than FIXME.
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lis
On 25/02/2015 07:01, Frederik Ramm wrote:
I think in many cases the proper action to perform on an object with
a FIXME tag that has "a low chance of ever getting addressed" is deletion.
+1
Though just as blind mechanical imports should not be done, so blind
mechanical deletes should also
On 25/02/2015 05:00, Bryce Nesbitt wrote:
Any fixme in wide use I'm not interested in deleting.
I'd strongly oppose the mechanical deletion of "low volume" fixme
values. Mappers local to me often use individually worded fixmes
describing something that needs investigation. By definition the
On 25.02.2015 02:58, Bryce Nesbitt wrote:
> It is apparent that a number of imports have left tens of thousands of
> fixme notes that have a low chance of ever getting addressed. Pick your
> favorite from the lists above: set␣better␣denotation is my mine.
That's from a mechanical edit that should
23 matches
Mail list logo
