Re: [Talk-it] Novità sulle piazze

Il giorno 4 gennaio 2017 14:55, Martin Koppenhoefer ha scritto: > > 2017-01-04 12:20 GMT+01:00 Cascafico Giovanni : > >> +1 >> Una piazza é descritta a sufficienza con highway pedestrian/living >> Street, area yes >> > > > come fai quando c'è un

Re: [talk-au] Local Government Areas without Councils

I agree that since the area is commonly known and and referred to as "Unincorporated Area of Far West NSW" so should be mapped in OSM and with that name. The other name tags In my opinion this area should be tagged as admin_level=6 since it acts and feels like other Shires, Councils, etc. Even if

Re: [Talk-us] First new 2016 NAIP imagery is now online (Massachusetts & Tennessee)

On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 9:05 PM, Mike N wrote: > On 1/4/2017 9:58 PM, James Mast wrote: > >> So, hopefully some more new imagery that we can use to update highway >> projects will be showing up soon >> > > I haven't been able to use NAIP WMS links since the USGS scaled back on

Re: [Talk-us] First new 2016 NAIP imagery is now online (Massachusetts & Tennessee)

Kentucky also has 2016 NAIP imagery available through the state's GIS office: http://kyraster.ky.gov/arcgis/rest/services/ImageServices/Ky_NAIP_2016_2FT/ImageServer http://kyraster.ky.gov/arcgis/rest/services/ImageServices/Ky_NAIP_2016_60cm_WGS84WM/ImageServer

Re: [Talk-us] First new 2016 NAIP imagery is now online (Massachusetts & Tennessee)

I tested out the new 2016 TN link in JOSM before I sent the original email and it worked perfectly fine for me. From: Mike N Sent: Wednesday, January 4, 2017 10:05:13 PM To: talk-us@openstreetmap.org Subject: Re: [Talk-us] First new 2016 NAIP

Re: [Talk-us] First new 2016 NAIP imagery is now online (Massachusetts & Tennessee)

On 1/4/2017 9:58 PM, James Mast wrote: So, hopefully some more new imagery that we can use to update highway projects will be showing up soon I haven't been able to use NAIP WMS links since the USGS scaled back on their online services. Do they work for you? Mike

[Talk-us] First new 2016 NAIP imagery is now online (Massachusetts & Tennessee)

https://gis.apfo.usda.gov/arcgis/rest/services/NAIP Folder: NAIP gis.apfo.usda.gov ArcGIS REST Services Directory Login: Home > services > NAIP: Help | API Reference: JSON | SOAP Just happened to check out the link (which I do every once in

Re: [talk-au] Local Government Areas without Councils

On 03-Jan-17 04:15 PM, Andrew Davidson wrote: On 3/1/17 13:24, Warin wrote: Near as I can figure .. your joking. No I'm being serious. Your proposal is to use level 6 to map the entity "that performs the function of a 'local government authority'". In the case of the western part of NSW

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Création suppression d'intercommunalité

les EPCI peuvent être à cheval sur plusieurs départements et même régions. Pour l'Ain par exemple (c'est mon département), il y a 3 intercommunalités qui sont à cheval sur plusieurs départements avec 3 département différents. Pour les 3 il n'y a pas grand chose dans l’Ain (2 fois 1 commune et une

Wochennotiz Nr. 337 27.12.2016–02.01.2017

Hallo, die Wochennotiz Nr. 337 mit vielen wichtigen Neuigkeiten aus der OpenStreetMap Welt ist da: http://blog.openstreetmap.de/blog/2017/01/wochennotiz-nr-337/ Viel Spaß beim Lesen! ___ Talk-de mailing list Talk-de@openstreetmap.org

Wochennotiz Nr. 337 27.12.2016–02.01.2017

Hallo, die Wochennotiz Nr. 337 mit vielen wichtigen Neuigkeiten aus der OpenStreetMap Welt ist da: http://blog.openstreetmap.de/blog/2017/01/wochennotiz-nr-337/ Viel Spaß beim Lesen! ___ Talk-at mailing list Talk-at@openstreetmap.org

Re: [OSM-talk] Wikipedia/Wikidata admins cleanup

Hi, On 01/04/2017 11:24 PM, Mikel Maron wrote: > Ok I hear you. Let me walk this back a step. Not the same standard, but > a standard beyond now that gives some visibility to the process. I know > there is a process of monitoring, analysis, communication and action > followed by the DWG. Let's

Re: [Talk-br] Mapeamento adequado de Estações de Trem

@naoliv, ihhh que eu to confundindo as coisas. hahahaha. Isso que é o bom do trabalho colaborativo, um corrige/ajuda o outro. Muito legal e útil isto sobre "Lifecycle prefix". Eu fiquei na dúvida em, sabendo-se as tags do texto a seguir, se é necessário o uso de railway:historic=station e

Re: [Talk-it] A proposito di qualità degli edit

2017-01-04 22:31 GMT+01:00 Marco_T : > pierluigi de rosa wrote >> Grazie a tutti della disponibilità e mi dispiace per il disguido > > Pierluigi, > assolutamente non devi dispiacerti per il disguido, anzi, il semplice fatto > che hai fatto conoscere OSM è encomiabile.

Re: [Talk-br] Sobre addr:interpolation - possibilidades

@Papibaquígrafo, 1. A questão é que existem muitos SN (sem número) cadastrados entre casas que já tem número. E as linhas ajudam a tapar este buraco, interpolando numerações intermediárias que possam existir. Do meu ponto de vista todo o material é provisório, pois na maioria dos casos o ponto

Re: [OSM-talk] Wikipedia/Wikidata admins cleanup

blockquote, div.yahoo_quoted { margin-left: 0 !important; border-left:1px #715FFA solid !important; padding-left:1ex !important; background-color:white !important; } Ok I hear you. Let me walk this back a step. Not the same standard, but a standard beyond now that gives some visibility to

Re: [Talk-de] Bitte Vorträge einreichen für die FOSSGIS-Konferenz

Jetzt habe ich es doch noch geschafft mir was für eine Einreichung zusammenzureimen. ;) Heuer wollte mir nicht so recht was einfallen. Michael Am 2017-01-01 um 21:09 schrieb Peter Barth: > Hallo, > > und da wir jetzt ein neues Jahr haben bumpe ich den Thread nochmal und > erinnere daran, dass

Re: [OSM-talk] Wikipedia/Wikidata admins cleanup

Mikel Maron wrote: > Reverts should be held to the same standard as imports (outside > of obviously urgent problems). Where a revert of an import (or other automated edit) is done by DWG because an import did not follow the rules, reverting that import just goes back to the status quo ante.

Re: [OSM-talk] Wikipedia/Wikidata admins cleanup

On Wednesday 04 January 2017, Mikel Maron wrote: > Reverts should be held to the same standard as imports (outside of > obviously urgent problems). Definitely not - if the only way to counteract an undiscussed mechanical edit that goes against the community principles is to have a discussed

Re: [OSM-talk] Wikipedia/Wikidata admins cleanup

I disagree with this. A revert is putting right the wrong of an undiscussed mechanical edit or automated import. *All* undiscussed imports should be reverted. That will be part of the enforcement of the mechanical edit guidelines. If we want high quality data (and I certainly do) we must

Re: [Talk-it] Mappa dei ripetitori radioamatoriali (su openstreetmap)

Umap può importare csv ed altro e permette la visualizzazione su diversi stili di OSM, inclusi quelli con curve di livello. Ciò aiuta l'aggiustamento delle posizioni. Una volta impostato il file, al clic sul singolo nodo (rappresento da una puntina) puoi far in modo che ti esca un popup con i

Re: [OSM-talk] Wikipedia/Wikidata admins cleanup

On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 9:41 PM, Rob Nickerson wrote: > > All, > > May I remind, that whilst we have no mechanism to *properly* vote on the adoption of new tags, we also have no mechanism to *properly* vote on whether a mechanical edit can go ahead or not, including mass

Re: [Talk-it] A proposito di qualità degli edit

pierluigi de rosa wrote > Grazie a tutti della disponibilità e mi dispiace per il disguido Pierluigi, assolutamente non devi dispiacerti per il disguido, anzi, il semplice fatto che hai fatto conoscere OSM è encomiabile. Per il resto sono daccordo con gli altri: gli errori/imprecisioni un po'

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Création suppression d'intercommunalité

La commune dans laquelle je vis, a fait partie pendant une période, d'une comcom du département voisin. Je ne sais pas si c'est toujours possible, mais ça pourrait être une réponse à ton problème. Le 04/01/2017 à 22:08, Francescu GAROBY a écrit : Bonsoir, J'ai un nouvel EPCI à cheval entre le

Re: [Talk-it] Parco Nazionale dell'Appennino Lucano

2016-12-28 9:58 GMT+01:00 Martin Koppenhoefer : > > aggiungerei in questo caso, come sempre nei casi analoghi, un relativo > commento al changeset, così l'informazione rimane legato alla mappa e al > edit, ed è visibile a livello internazionale (non solo in talk-it, anche

Re: [OSM-talk] Wikipedia/Wikidata admins cleanup

On 04/01/2017 21:01, Andy Mabbett wrote: On 4 January 2017 at 19:49, Frederik Ramm wrote: we can afford to wait until someone who actually knows the area they are working in has the time to add Wikidata tags. As has been made clear in other discussions in which you have

Re: [OSM-talk] Wikipedia/Wikidata admins cleanup

Reverts should be held to the same standard as imports (outside of obviously urgent problems). That means a well documented and visible plan, community discussion. Rob's comment shows that it is not possible for someone eyeing a revert to judge this from a quick look at the data or discussion

Re: [OSM-talk] Wikipedia/Wikidata admins cleanup

Are your continuous claims of FUD more FUD? Or is me questioning this more FUD of FUD of FUD? You see this can go on towards infinity. Am 2017-01-04 um 22:01 schrieb Andy Mabbett: > On 4 January 2017 at 19:49, Frederik Ramm wrote: > >> there's quite a few people in OSM who

Re: [Talk-it] A proposito di qualità degli edit

2017-01-04 21:52 GMT+01:00 Marcello : > > Per concludere vorrei riportare una mia impressione, non so se condivisa > anche dagli altri, mi sembra che chi inizia a mappare usando JOSM introduce > errori grossolani più raramente rispetto a chi utilizza gli editors online. > I vari

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Création suppression d'intercommunalité

Bonsoir, J'ai un nouvel EPCI à cheval entre le Calvados et l'Eure, sauf que je ne vois pas de changement récent de la frontière de ces 2 départements, qui engloberait (d'un coté ou de l'autre) la totalité des communes dudit EPCI. Normal ? Pour info, il s'agit de l'EPCI "Communauté de communes de

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Circonscriptions électorales...

Tout à fait. il n'y a plus de lien entre cantons et circonscriptions législatives (depuis longtemps, même avant la réforme des cantons quand ils étaient encore des subdivisions des arrondissements départementaux). Pour les deux types de circonscriptions électorales (cantons départementaux et

Re: [OSM-talk] Wikipedia/Wikidata admins cleanup

On 4 January 2017 at 20:41, Rob Nickerson wrote: > Please don't revert the ones near me. We spent considerable time with a > contributor (not Yuri but someone else) to ensure that my local community > were happy with the proposed edit before it was completed. This is

Re: [OSM-talk] Wikipedia/Wikidata admins cleanup

On 4 January 2017 at 19:49, Frederik Ramm wrote: > there's quite a few people in OSM who think that > low-quality Wikidata tags are better than no Wikidata tags at all Are there? Or is this more FUD? > we can afford to wait until someone who actually knows the area they

Re: [Talk-GB] OS products (WAS:Quarterly task)

For water courses etc. this will make little difference (other than types of changes best checked against aerial imagery as mentioned by Andy & Phil). A tiled layer of this data would either require setting stuff up with mod_tile or a brute force render of multiple layers taking up masses &

Re: [Talk-it] A proposito di qualità degli edit

On 04/01/2017 17:30, pierluigi de rosa wrote: > Gentile Marcello, > mi chiamo Pierluigi De Rosa e sono un utente storico di OSM ma molto > poco attivo. Pierluigi, io ho conosciuto OSM solo nel 2013, quando scoprii che uno dei primi mapping party fu a Perugia mi rammaricai molto perché abitavo a

Re: [Talk-GB] OS products (WAS:Quarterly task)

My understanding is that OS Street View is no longer updated. Would anyone be able to make a raster layer of the new OS products so that they can more easily be added to JOSM (for tracing)? Rob On 4 Jan 2017 8:15 p.m., "SK53" wrote: > Download and read in shapefiles

Re: [OSM-talk] Wikipedia/Wikidata admins cleanup

Frederik, Please don't revert the ones near me. We spent considerable time with a contributor (not Yuri but someone else) to ensure that my local community were happy with the proposed edit before it was completed. All, May I remind, that whilst we have no mechanism to *properly* vote on the

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Création suppression d'intercommunalité

Le 04/01/2017 à 20:32, Jérôme Amagat a écrit : Le chef lieu c'est la ville où est le siège. c'est comme ça pour les communes, départements, régions... Ok, sauf qu'une comcom n'a que très peu en commun avec les communes, département, etc.. et qu'une intercommunalité n'a pas de chef-lieu. Indiqué

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Fusion de communes au 1er Janvier...

Sur les codes postaux, josm n'aime pas les addr:postcode=* sur les chef lieu de commune est-ce qu'il ne faudrait pas les enlevé des place=* et les avoir que sur les relations des communes. Pareil pour la population qui est sur le place et sur la relation, là pas de problème avec josm mais le

Re: [Talk-GB] OS products (WAS:Quarterly task)

On Wed, 2017-01-04 at 19:57 +, Rob Nickerson wrote: > >BTW: > >https://www.ordnancesurvey.co.uk/opendatadownload/products.html > > > > >OS Open Map - Local (has several water layers) and OS Open Rivers were > >updated 10/2016 > > How do I view these in JOSM? Thanks :-) > > > > > > >

Re: [Talk-GB] OS products (WAS:Quarterly task)

Download and read in shapefiles (probably best to chop up first with ogr2ogr unless you have gazillions of Gbytes of memory). You may need the OpenData plugin for this. Like a lot of OS products these are probably a mix of not detailed enough or too detailed (banks of narrow streams), which is

Re: [Talk-br] Mapeamento adequado de Estações de Trem

Arlindo, Bom saber! É o tipo de coisa que acontece com frequência em "exércitos de um homem só". Abraços! Em qua, 4 de jan de 2017 às 17:51, Arlindo Pereira < arlindosaraivapere...@gmail.com> escreveu: > Vítor, > > sou o que o pessoal chama de "railfan", fazendo parte inclusive de uma >

[Talk-GB] OS products (WAS:Quarterly task)

>BTW:>https://www.ordnancesurvey.co.uk/opendatadownload/products.html > > >OS Open Map - Local (has several water layers) and OS Open Rivers were >updated 10/2016 How do I view these in JOSM? Thanks :-) *Rob*

Re: [OSM-talk] Wikipedia/Wikidata admins cleanup

> This all conversation confort my (un-educated, I confess) idea of the > uselessness of cross referencing the Wikipedia ecosystem with OSM with OSM > tags. > > Automated addition of wikidata id to OSM objects seems worthy, so why not > doing it on the fly instead of writing it to the database?

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Circonscriptions électorales...

J'ai regarder des arrêtés préfectoraux pour les communes nouvelle et les intercommunalité et j'ai jamais rien vu sur des redécoupages de circonscriptions électorales, les arrondissement départementaux sont parfois modifié mais c'est tout. il me semble que normalement les circonscriptions sont basé

Re: [Talk-br] Mapeamento adequado de Estações de Trem

Vítor, sou o que o pessoal chama de "railfan", fazendo parte inclusive de uma associação chamada Trilhos do Rio. Já identificamos diversos erros no Estações Ferroviárias, e o autor do site não se mostra muito solícito para realizar as correções necessárias. Por conta disto, tenha o site como um

Re: [OSM-talk] Wikipedia/Wikidata admins cleanup

Hi, On 01/04/2017 07:25 PM, nebulon42 wrote: > I would revert it then. > Violations of the automated edits policy should not be tolerated. Some automated Wikidata additions have been reverted by me in the past, mainly where they came from an algorithm that used proximity (and not existing

Re: [OSM-talk] Wikipedia/Wikidata admins cleanup

On 04.01.2017 20:04, Yves wrote: This all conversation confort my (un-educated, I confess) idea of the uselessness of cross referencing the Wikipedia ecosystem with OSM with OSM tags. Automated addition of wikidata id to OSM objects seems worthy, so why not doing it on the fly instead of

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Création suppression d'intercommunalité

Le chef lieu c'est la ville où est le siège. c'est comme ça pour les communes, départements, régions... Dans les arrêtés préfectoraux que j'ai vu, ça parle de siège à une adresse précise ou de siège dans une ville. Pour l'admin_centre (déjà je considère que c'est pour le chef lieu comme ce qui est

Re: [Talk-br] Mapeamento adequado de Estações de Trem

Oi Vítor muito interessante, obrigado por compartilhar este link abraço Gerald 2017-01-04 16:45 GMT-02:00 Vítor Rodrigo Dias : > Uma boa fonte de dados para verificar o estado atual de estações é o site > http://www.estacoesferroviarias.com.br/. Poderíamos entrar em

Re: [OSM-talk] Wikipedia/Wikidata admins cleanup

This all conversation confort my (un-educated, I confess) idea of the uselessness of cross referencing the Wikipedia ecosystem with OSM with OSM tags. Automated addition of wikidata id to OSM objects seems worthy, so why not doing it on the fly instead of writing it to the database? Next

Re: [Talk-GB] Quarterly task

I'd also be happy with water (even though I'm still slogging through FHRS data) One thing which needs agreement is the tagging of areas of water, especially the waterway banks: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Water_details This is appears to be the accepted method

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Création suppression d'intercommunalité

Ce "chef-lieu" est dans les statuts qui indiquent la commune accueillant le siège de la comcom. Pour les anciennes comcom plus petites c'était directement dans la mairie, mais les actuelles comcom sont beaucoup plus grandes et ont créé des hôtels communautaires/hôtel d'agglomération. Ce figure

Re: [OSM-talk] Wikipedia/Wikidata admins cleanup

On 04.01.2017 19:52, Christoph Hormann wrote: It is not the check that needs to be manual, it is the edit. In other words: finding errors can often be automatized to a high degree with good reliability - just look at the OSM Inspector coastline and area views which are very useful for the

Re: [OSM-talk] Wikipedia/Wikidata admins cleanup

On Wednesday 04 January 2017, Oleksiy Muzalyev wrote: > > Well - in OSM use of and reliance on this expensive resource is the > > core of the whole project and we use automated edits only when they > > are deemed desirable by the expensive humans on a per case basis. > > I agree with this idea

Re: [Talk-es] Importaciones - continuación del debate de la reunión virtual-

El 04/01/17 a las 16:28, yo paseopor escribió: Pues ya que estamos...si se pudiera incluir un enlace a la vía (y no solo la ID) en los errores de Oneway, serviría de mucha ayuda, tal y como ya pasa en los errores de Roundabout...que nos hemos "petao" por cierto :P Salut i Rotondes yopaseopor

[Talk-br] CNEFE no OpenAddresses

A quem interessar possa, há uma proposta de inclusão dos endereços do CNEFE no OpenAddresses, um projeto relacionado mas independente do OSM. O OpenAddresses não requer nenhuma edição manual, portanto esta inclusão é bem mais fácil e rápida do que aquilo que vem sendo discutido aqui. O local

Re: [Talk-br] Mapeamento adequado de Estações de Trem

Uma boa fonte de dados para verificar o estado atual de estações é o site http://www.estacoesferroviarias.com.br/. Poderíamos entrar em contato com o autor do site para verificar a possibilidade de uso como fonte de consulta. Em qua, 4 de jan de 2017 às 15:35, Nelson A. de Oliveira

Re: [OSM-talk] Wikipedia/Wikidata admins cleanup

I would revert it then. Violations of the automated edits policy should not be tolerated. Michael Am 2017-01-04 um 19:17 schrieb Philip Barnes: > On Wed, 2017-01-04 at 18:16 +0200, Tomas Straupis wrote: >> There was a flow of undiscussed automated wikidata additions in >> Lithuania with

Re: [OSM-talk] Wikipedia/Wikidata admins cleanup

On 04.01.2017 18:05, Christoph Hormann wrote: Well - in OSM use of and reliance on this expensive resource is the core of the whole project and we use automated edits only when they are deemed desirable by the expensive humans on a per case basis. I agree with this idea completely. At the same

Re: [OSM-talk] Wikipedia/Wikidata admins cleanup

On Wed, 2017-01-04 at 18:16 +0200, Tomas Straupis wrote: > There was a flow of undiscussed automated wikidata additions in > Lithuania with problems. I asked for discussion before automated > changes. I was given a promise that a discussion will follow. But > there was no discussion. And automated

Re: [Talk-es] TF-1 en Tenerife

Ya sabeis lo que opino sobre las categorías...si no cumplen condiciones...no las cumplen.Y exijamos que las cumplan si es lo que deseamos.Menos rescates de vías inútiles y deficitarias, más inversión. Para refrescarlo https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Normalizaci%C3%B3n_f%C3%ADsica Salut i

Re: [OSM-talk] Wikipedia/Wikidata admins cleanup

On Wednesday 04 January 2017, AJ Ashton wrote: > > "The ID of the Wikidata item about the feature" > > > > suggests a one-to-one relationship and having the same wikidata ID > > on more than one feature would always be an error but taginfo tells > > us that there are more than 22000 wikidata

Re: [Talk-GB] Quarterly task

On Wed, 2017-01-04 at 17:05 +, Christian Ledermann wrote: > BTW: > https://www.ordnancesurvey.co.uk/opendatadownload/products.html > > OS Open Map - Local (has several water layers) and OS Open Rivers > were > updated 10/2016 > It certainly a useful project. I often come across npe streams,

Re: [Talk-br] Mapeamento adequado de Estações de Trem

2017-01-04 2:11 GMT-02:00 santamariense : > 2. Se não existe mais a estrutura (prédio) onde funcionava a estação, > usa-se a tag abandoned:railway=station No abandoned o prédio ainda existe, mas em estado de muita má conversação (um prédio que ficou exposto ao tempo e ficou

Re: [Talk-es] TF-1 en Tenerife

Ese tramo y los que no cumplan con las características de autovia autopista debe ser trunk Ricardo Sanz Moreno > El 4 ene 2017, a las 17:51, Cruz Enrique Borges Hernández > escribió: > > Hasta donde yo me acuerdo de la teórica autopista son las carreteras > con vias

Re: [OSM-talk] Wikipedia/Wikidata admins cleanup

On Wed, Jan 4, 2017, at 08:22, Christoph Hormann wrote: > "The ID of the Wikidata item about the feature" > > suggests a one-to-one relationship and having the same wikidata ID on > more than one feature would always be an error but taginfo tells us > that there are more than 22000 wikidata

Re: [OSM-talk] Wikipedia/Wikidata admins cleanup

On 04/01/2017 16:43, Yuri Astrakhan wrote: * I think MapRoulette is actually the tool we should use to fix these issues. Hell no. Let's consider that when MapRoulette users have fixed all problems with the TIGER data in the USA - a task that it is far better suited to. MapRoulette's great

Re: [OSM-talk] Wikipedia/Wikidata admins cleanup

On 04/01/2017 16:05, Andy Mabbett wrote: Third time of asking: would you accept a single random bad tag/changeset on OSM as evidence that "tags in OSM are already of low quality"? What's that got to do with the price of fish? To be clear, this isn't one single changeset. It's just

Re: [OSM-talk] Wikipedia/Wikidata admins cleanup

On Wednesday 04 January 2017, Yuri Astrakhan wrote: > [...] > Humans are a VERY > expensive resource, lets use it only when necessary. Well - in OSM use of and reliance on this expensive resource is the core of the whole project and we use automated edits only when they are deemed desirable by

Re: [OSM-talk] Wikipedia/Wikidata admins cleanup

I'm now trying to clean up the wikidata / wikipedia tags on administrative boundaries in Belgium. One of the problems seems that nyuriks automatically (?) added wikidata tags [1] without making sure the wikipedia tags were placed correctly in OSM. And now that same person asks to help him clean

Re: [Talk-GB] Quarterly task

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/UK_2017_Q1_Project:_Water It might be that someone finds a really good water project that could be spun up into a quarterly project in the future. I started noting some of the ideas https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/UK_quarterly_project_ideas so that they

Re: [OSM-talk] Wikipedia/Wikidata admins cleanup

Like many conversations about Wikidata tagging, I think this one suffers from varying levels of stringency -- and perhaps letting the perfect become the enemy of the good. At the risk of stating the obvious, it is often the case that Wikidata's conceptual model of places does not exactly match

Re: [Talk-es] TF-1 en Tenerife

Hasta donde yo me acuerdo de la teórica autopista son las carreteras con vias separadas y sin pasos al mismo nivel (sin necesidad de dos vías por sentido). Ahora mismo no estoy seguro del primer punto, pero si es así, efectivamente esa carretera no es una autopista. El día 4 de enero de 2017,

Re: [OSM-talk] Wikipedia/Wikidata admins cleanup

* I think MapRoulette is actually the tool we should use to fix these issues. I am not yet sure how to build an OT query that gets relations for the challenge, but this approach should automate the whole process. Any ideas? https://github.com/maproulette/maproulette2/issues/259 * Wikidata tags

Re: [Talk-it] Grafo strade ANAS

2017-01-04 12:18 GMT+01:00 Federico Cortese : > A proposito di name delle statali, secondo voi è corretto inserire il > ref nel name o andrebbe messo solo nel ref, come si fa di solito con > tutti gli altri oggetti? > Esempio: "Strada Statale 16 Adriatica" oppure "Strada

Re: [Talk-it] A proposito di qualità degli edit

Gentile Marcello, mi chiamo Pierluigi De Rosa e sono un utente storico di OSM ma molto poco attivo. Da circa tre anni tengo il corso di GIS presso l'Università di Perugia e lo faccio con strumenti Open. In particolare uso QGIS ma non solo (anche gdal, geopaparazzi, GRASS, spatialite gui, ecc...).

[Talk-es] TF-1 en Tenerife

¿Alguien de Canarias por aquí? He pasado unos días de vacaciones en Tenerife y me he movido bastante con Osmand. Aunque no he hecho mucho por mapear (estaba de vacaciones y esas cosas) sí me ha llamado la atención que la TF-1 tiene un tramo, en torno al Túnel del Bicho, que está marcado como

Re: [Talk-GB] Quarterly task

Perhaps also worth trying to get the flow direction right. http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=water can be helpful here. -- Cheers, John On 04-Jan-17 15:22, Andy Townsend wrote: On 03/01/2017 22:34, Rob Nickerson wrote: Water sounds good. ... and to me too - in fact it's what I've been

Re: [Talk-it] Scraping dati?

ok, carico il mio shape su josm e vedo cosa esce, di sicuro non sono taggate come craft=winery perchè da overpass non risulta nulla. grazie L From: Simone Sent: Wednesday, January 4, 2017 4:13 PM To: openstreetmap list - italiano;

Re: [Talk-it] Scraping dati?

Si, stasera provo a mettre giù un'email di richiesta da spedire. From: Maurizio Napolitano Sent: Wednesday, January 4, 2017 4:11 PM To: openstreetmap list - italiano Subject: Re: [Talk-it] Scraping dati? 2017-01-04 17:00 GMT+01:00 Luca

Re: [OSM-talk] Wikipedia/Wikidata admins cleanup

There was a flow of undiscussed automated wikidata additions in Lithuania with problems. I asked for discussion before automated changes. I was given a promise that a discussion will follow. But there was no discussion. And automated changes resumed. I see it as violation of automated edit rules

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Création suppression d'intercommunalité

Merci pour cette page. Je la mettrai à jour rapidement. Pour l'instant, j'ai fait Loire-Atlantique, Vendée, Maine-et-Loire. Ce dernier était corsé... Il me reste la Mayenne et la Sarthe. Au passage, je rencontre beaucoup de comcom avec comme admin_center, un node place. Ca ne me parait pas

Re: [Talk-it] Scraping dati?

Il 04 gennaio 2017 17:00:54 CET, Luca Moiana ha scritto: >ok, come fai a verificare le coordinate? > > >Io le ho ricavate da un tag data-lat e data-lng contenuto nella pagine Ci sono buone possibilità che siano coordinate google maps, dal link da te fornito, ogni

Re: [OSM-talk] Wikipedia/Wikidata admins cleanup

On Wednesday 04 January 2017, Andy Mabbett wrote: > > > > Then you'd need to change the tag definition on the wiki to reflect > > that (and to explain what these circumstances are). > > You - and thus I - were talking about "Wikidata values", now you're > talking about a single tag. Which is it,

Re: [Talk-it] Scraping dati?

2017-01-04 17:00 GMT+01:00 Luca Moiana : > > ok, come fai a verificare le coordinate? > Io le ho ricavate da un tag data-lat e data-lng contenuto nella pagine Solitamente lo fai inserendo gli indirizzi o i nomi dei locali su Google Maps Ho preso questo indirizzo

Re: [OSM-talk] Wikipedia/Wikidata admins cleanup

On 4 January 2017 at 15:55, Andy Townsend wrote: > On 04/01/2017 15:36, Andy Mabbett wrote: >> Please quantify that; against the total number of Wikidata tags. > 214 changes in that changeset; at first glance 82 civil parishes in there > likely to be in error if they have the

Re: [Talk-it] Grafo strade ANAS

Il giorno mer, 04/01/2017 alle 12.18 +0100, Federico Cortese ha scritto: > > A proposito di name delle statali, secondo voi è corretto inserire il > ref nel name o andrebbe messo solo nel ref, come si fa di solito con > tutti gli altri oggetti? > Esempio: "Strada Statale 16 Adriatica" oppure

Re: [OSM-talk] Wikipedia/Wikidata admins cleanup

On 04/01/17 16:45, Andy Mabbett wrote: > And where is the link I requested? https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/wikidata#values Go to page 429. That shows that the first ~22,000 wikidata values have 2+ occurrences. There are hundreds with 10+ values the number of actual duplicates is much

Re: [Talk-it] Scraping dati?

ok, come fai a verificare le coordinate? Io le ho ricavate da un tag data-lat e data-lng contenuto nella pagine grazie From: Maurizio Napolitano Sent: Wednesday, January 4, 2017 3:57 PM To: openstreetmap list - italiano Subject: Re:

Re: [Talk-it] Scraping dati?

Io contatterei le persone del consorzio Inoltre, sei certo che le coordinate dei punti non siano calcolate usando il geocoder di google? 2017-01-04 16:53 GMT+01:00 Luca Moiana : > Ciao, > > > è la prima volta che mi capita, > > per un progetto ho dovuto fare lo scraping

Re: [OSM-talk] Wikipedia/Wikidata admins cleanup

On 04/01/2017 15:36, Andy Mabbett wrote: Please quantify that; against the total number of Wikidata tags. 214 changes in that changeset; at first glance 82 civil parishes in there likely to be in error if they have the "Dunham on Trent" problem - about 38%.

Re: [OSM-talk] Wikipedia/Wikidata admins cleanup

On 4 January 2017 at 15:38, Christoph Hormann wrote: > On Wednesday 04 January 2017, Andy Mabbett wrote: >> There are circumstances where it is legitimate for a >> Wikidata value to be used more than once. > > Then you'd need to change the tag definition on the wiki to

[Talk-it] Scraping dati?

Ciao, è la prima volta che mi capita, per un progetto ho dovuto fare lo scraping dei dati del Consorzio del Franciacorta [1] e ora mi trovo con un file geografico con tutte le informazioni. Vi chiedo: 1 è legale fare l'import su OSM ? 2 se si, quale strumento è il più adatto a caricarli?

Re: [OSM-talk] Wikipedia/Wikidata admins cleanup

On Wednesday 04 January 2017, Andy Mabbett wrote: > There are circumstances where it is legitimate for a > Wikidata value to be used more than once. Then you'd need to change the tag definition on the wiki to reflect that (and to explain what these circumstances are). -- Christoph Hormann

Re: [OSM-talk] Wikipedia/Wikidata admins cleanup

On 4 January 2017 at 15:24, Andy Townsend wrote: > On 04/01/2017 15:08, Andy Mabbett wrote: >> >> On 4 January 2017 at 13:09, Andy Townsend wrote: >> >>> Do my comments on http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/43749373 count >>> as >>> "evidence" or

Re: [Talk-cz] WeeklyOSM CZ 335

Viz mapu světelného znečištění: http://svetelneznecisteni.cz/mapovani-tmy/ To je to samé, ale naopak. :-) -- Mikoláš Štrajt / Severák / http://severak.svita.cz/ -- Původní zpráva -- Od: Jan Macura Komu: OpenStreetMap Czech Republic

Re: [Talk-it] Mappa dei ripetitori radioamatoriali (su openstreetmap)

Ciao Giovanni, Il giorno 4 gennaio 2017 12:26, Cascafico Giovanni ha scritto: > Il 04/gen/2017 08:28, "Fabrizio Carrai" ha > scritto: > > > > Pongo un domanda a tutti: sarebbe corretto importare/usare le coordinate > QTH dei ponti radio anche se

Re: [Talk-es] Importaciones - continuación del debate de la reunión virtual-

Pues ya que estamos...si se pudiera incluir un enlace a la vía (y no solo la ID) en los errores de Oneway, serviría de mucha ayuda, tal y como ya pasa en los errores de Roundabout...que nos hemos "petao" por cierto :P Salut i Rotondes yopaseopor ___

Re: [OSM-talk] Wikipedia/Wikidata admins cleanup

On 04/01/2017 15:08, Andy Mabbett wrote: On 4 January 2017 at 13:09, Andy Townsend wrote: Do my comments on http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/43749373 count as "evidence" or "anecdotes" in your book? It is evidence that /one/ tag is wrong. To quote from the

  1   2   >