On 27-Oct-17 04:51 PM, Oleksiy Muzalyev wrote:
On 27.10.17 00:49, Dave F wrote:
[...]
I think you'd be hard pressed to find any area of trees which hasn't
been managed in one way or another by humans; especially in the
Western world. [...]
There is a theory nowadays that woods should be left
On 27.10.17 00:49, Dave F wrote:
[...]
I think you'd be hard pressed to find any area of trees which hasn't
been managed in one way or another by humans; especially in the
Western world. [...]
There is a theory nowadays that woods should be left alone to natural
cycles which may last hundred
(Split to a separate thread)
The woods/forest problem is one of the worst tagging cock-ups in OSM.
It's bad enough when alternate values are used to differentiate what is
actually the same object, but in this case it's also the key!
I think you'd be hard pressed to find any area of trees whic
Started a new thread as it's gone of subject.
DaveF.
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
W dniu 26.10.2017 o 23:36, Warin pisze:
While natural=wood renders, I also tag them as landcover=trees as that
is more truthful of what is there.
So these tree areas get two tags from me until such time as landcover
is rendered then I will remove the natural tag.
If you mean standard tile laye
On 27-Oct-17 12:00 AM, Joseph Reeves wrote:
A problem i find is with landuse=forest. Formally, those are zones
that are used for growing trees. But practically in OSM, that tag
is used for any land that is covered with trees. So formally,
landuse=forest shouldn't overlap with ot
On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 12:50:40PM +0300, Tomas Straupis wrote:
> Hello
>
> For a long time I wanted to hear opinion on the topic of topology rules.
>
> By "topology rules" here I mean just simple rules such as:
> * polygon X should not overlap polygon Y
> * polygon X should always be abo
A problem i find is with landuse=forest. Formally, those are zones that are
used for growing trees. But practically in OSM, that tag is used for any
land that is covered with trees. So formally, landuse=forest shouldn't
overlap with other zones, but practically, until a new tag
(landcover=trees) is
I like the idea of formalizing OSM topology!
An example: power lines should share nodes with nothing except power
towers, portals and buildings (substation buildings).
A problem i find is with landuse=forest. Formally, those are zones that are
used for growing trees. But practically in OSM, that
9 matches
Mail list logo