On Sun, Dec 3, 2017 at 10:08 PM, Walter Nordmann wrote:
> add some more changeset-discussions on newer CS.
>
> if he/she still does not react, send a mail to DWG (d...@osmfoundation.org)
> and describe the problem. they will force the user to respect your comment
>
https://www.mail-archive.com/t
add some more changeset-discussions on newer CS.
if he/she still does not react, send a mail to DWG
(d...@osmfoundation.org) and describe the problem. they will force the
user to respect your comments.
regards
walter
Am 04.12.2017 um 04:57 schrieb Paul Johnson:
Keep an eye out on
http://www
Keep an eye out on http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Zowie%20Polie/history
It's been a few times now that I've seen this user bulk-rename wide swaths
of the map, latest victim was Amarillo, which was renamed Boy's Bathroom
Tascosa Drive In. Can't seem to find any rhyme or reason for this user's
e
W dniu 03.12.2017 o 19:31, Yves pisze:
Because the discussion can be heated by the fear of seeing something
'disappear' from the map overnight.
Well, the fear might be there, but the discussion was already here, it
was not too heated, and that was just my conclusions after the
discussion. I
I have been misunderstood! :) I am not one of Polimappers, I just stumbled
across it on the Wiki calendar. So we have 3 independent entities inventing
a similar idea.
My "challenge" is only now in development on Etherpad, time will tell if I
will ever get to finish it, maybe some other member of Po
Good idea, is it normal you get a
"Error connecting to OSM API"?
On Dec 3, 2017 5:22 PM, "Ilya Zverev" wrote:
> Wow, that is an awesome project! I envy you students for having such
> unusual OSM activities :) And thanks to you, now I know about the
> backrest=* tag. Everyone here could benefit
Wow, that is an awesome project! I envy you students for having such
unusual OSM activities :) And thanks to you, now I know about the
backrest=* tag. Everyone here could benefit from it.
Can you write a blog post about the PoliMappers' Adventures? Maybe it
could get published on blog.osm.org
Incidentally, that's what I envisioned, as well as did Polimappers [1].
Great minds think alike - all in a short period ;) But unlike me you
actually delivered, with software to support it.
I planned to have 30 or more challenges in some succession, not limited to
mapping, but also showing the OSM
Hi,
I am Ilya and I have been uploading changesets 15 days in a row. Not
because I'm so into it or somebody makes me: I've made a tool that
reminds me to do it. In a year I expect my HDYC activity chart to be
completely filled. And you can have the same too.
Introducing OSM Streak: a website
Le 3 décembre 2017 19:07:24 GMT+01:00, "Daniel Koć" a
écrit :
W dniu 03.12.2017 o 18:43, Yves pisze:
I do agree with Christoph here, tag depreciation should be discussed
outside of the scope of osm-carto.
It would be interesting for me to hear the exact reasons why do you
think that?
Becau
W dniu 03.12.2017 o 18:43, Yves pisze:
I do agree with Christoph here, tag depreciation should be discussed
outside of the scope of osm-carto.
It would be interesting for me to hear the exact reasons why do you
think that?
I would also like to know how do you think should we talk about the
I do agree with Christoph here, tag depreciation should be discussed outside of
the scope of osm-carto.
Daniel, this all thread looks like you want to promote a tagging scheme for the
primary reason you can't make it look nice on the slippy map. That's really not
helping tagging discussions!
Y
W dniu 03.12.2017 o 11:06, Christoph Hormann pisze:
As said before: *do not mix rendering and tagging discussions*.
I don't fully understand what you're suggesting (it's a long, complex
sentence), but I feel you're accusing me of something bad. Please note
that the first point about general
On Sunday 03 December 2017, Daniel Koc4� wrote:
>
> TL;DR summary: I think that for now we should render all the existing
> tags with osm-carto, but make some of them appear earlier to
> encourage smooth migration to a more precise scheme.
You are clearly out of line here - the suggestion that the
14 matches
Mail list logo
