Hi Marc,
On Sat, Aug 10, 2019 at 7:36 PM marc marc wrote:
> could you share a link that shows that it is the local community that
> solicited facebook as the wiki page claims and not facebook that invents
> a collaboration to "whashing" their wishs ? given the frequent issues
> (about both the q
Hi Frederik,
On Sat, Aug 10, 2019 at 5:55 PM Frederik Ramm wrote:
> do I understand correctly that you and your local partners aim to
> recruit new mappers to OSM, who will not learn the "old fashioned"
> workflow of tracing stuff from imagery by hand, but be mainly taught to
> work with pre-pro
Hi Martin,
For another perspective, imagine someone making a world map with 85%
OpenStreetMap data and 15% XY inc. data, if someone looks on a part of
this map which is fed by these 15% XY data, you would not want to have
it incorrectly attributed to OpenStreetMap (although we are generally
t
Hi,
We had a tight schedule for this survey, because we want to be able to
present something by the next SotM. That explains why some questions aren't
exactly worded perfectly. It would have been better to get more people
involved and do more testing. But that inevitably slows things down. We did
sent from a phone
On 10. Aug 2019, at 11:27, Nuno Caldeira wrote:
>> can't they use more than one data source?
>> Yes, i do agree. Sounds like a good argument to remove the 50% of the
>> guideline.
>>
> Yes, i do agree. Sounds like a good argument to remove the 50% of the
> guideline.
>
Oh right that sounds fair...not.
Same applies to this https://janaodaparaabastecer.vost.pt/ theres Mapbox
logo, there's VOST logo, then under "i" crap load of sources...oh yeh
that's OSM for sure, i know my edits well. clearly the 50% rule needs to
be removed from the guidance as users are us
Hello,
> The community of OSM mappers in the Philippines
could you share a link that shows that it is the local community that
solicited facebook as the wiki page claims and not facebook that invents
a collaboration to "whashing" their wishs ? given the frequent issues
(about both the quality
On Sat, 10 Aug 2019 at 17:27, Joseph Eisenberg
wrote:
> It's even hard to recommend apps like Maps.me when they don't
> attribute Openstreetmap, instead putting their own logo in the lower
> right corner.
>
> If people don't know that OSM is the source of the data in a map, they
> won't know how
On 09.08.19 16:35, Frederik Ramm wrote:
> I wonder if we could perhaps get rid of the "Contributors" mention
> altogether.
This idea makes a lot of sense. Especially as both the guideline draft
and the current FAQ already allow this "if space is limited":
> Because OpenStreetMap is its contributo
Eugene,
do I understand correctly that you and your local partners aim to
recruit new mappers to OSM, who will not learn the "old fashioned"
workflow of tracing stuff from imagery by hand, but be mainly taught to
work with pre-processed Facebook road data?
How will you ensure that your partners g
So maybe it is an unauthorized use of Mapbox. Anyone can sign up free.
You should report it to Mapbox.
Nah, they stop replying me, they must have me on blacklist. Which goes a
bit against their values "*Be respectful and humble.* To everyone —
always." https://www.mapbox.com/about/values/
Kathleen Lu wrote:
> "reasonably calculated" means "reasonable." What does reasonable mean?
> Well a court would look at what other people in the industry do. Do others
> in the industry list attribution, especially to multiple data sources,
> after
> a click (or many clicks)? Yes, all the time.
I'm just an individual mapper who would like more people to be aware
of Openstreetmap. I'm not a professional cartographer, nor do I have
any ties to any map providers.
My concern right now is that most of my friends and family are
completely unaware of the existence of Openstreetmap, even though
13 matches
Mail list logo
