Vào lúc 08:46 2022-09-30, Andrew Hain đã viết:
The Wikidata links haven’t gone away; they’re in the OSM data items
where they are easily machine readable and can be curated against
accidental divergences between languages. The other description
arguments could just as easily follow (there’s no
Sep 30, 2022, 18:21 by marc_m...@mailo.com:
> Le 27.09.22 à 21:48, Mateusz Konieczny via talk a écrit :
>
>> Sep 26, 2022, 13:49 by marc_m...@mailo.com:
>>
>> is it possible to have a list by country? i would be willing to go
>> through a series of images and contact one or the other person
Sep 30, 2022, 18:19 by marc_m...@mailo.com:
> you're deleting a *data*, an info (the match between tag
> and a wikidata item) on the wiki
>
Just to confirm:
are you aware that https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dtree
has matching data item
Date: Sep 30, 2022, 18:26
From: marc_m...@mailo.com
To: talk@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] remove link to Wikidata from infoboxes is a valid arg
to remove it from wiki page and data items ?
> Hello,
>
> Le 30.09.22 à 13:36, Frederik Ramm a écrit :
>
>> "Make link far less prominent"
Hello,
Le 30.09.22 à 13:36, Frederik Ramm a écrit :
"Make link far less prominent" is not the same as "delete link".
Therefore the bot activity has, in my opinion, no community backing and needs to be stopped and reverted.
Thanks for your opinion, I hope it will be a consensus
Regards,
Le 27.09.22 à 21:48, Mateusz Konieczny via talk a écrit :
Sep 26, 2022, 13:49 by marc_m...@mailo.com:
is it possible to have a list by country? i would be willing to go
through a series of images and contact one or the other person concerned
Are you interested in specific area?
Le 30.09.22 à 15:08, Mateusz Konieczny via talk a écrit :
Sep 30, 2022, 14:55 by marc_m...@mailo.com:
Le 30.09.22 à 14:42, Mateusz Konieczny via talk a écrit :
Not entirely sure what should be done differently.
if you want to vote on "hide", use an url and a title with *hide*,
The Wikidata links haven’t gone away; they’re in the OSM data items where they
are easily machine readable and can be curated against accidental divergences
between languages. The other description arguments could just as easily follow
(there’s no problem with them being listed in the wiki
On Fri, 30 Sept 2022 at 14:51, Frederik Ramm wrote:
> On 30.09.22 14:32, Andy Mabbett wrote:
> > As you are well aware, I have been strongly and consistently against
> > this asinine idea since it was first proposed; I don't have the energy
> > to repeat myself in every new forum where you
Hello,
Indeed the missing data is due to human resources, the import is still
progressing, but slowly.
ted3sco started the process and mapped most of them; I also helped and
added 2 or 3 counties worth of administrative boundaries.
The imports requires a very thorough work and we only find time
Hi,
On 30.09.22 14:32, Andy Mabbett wrote:
As you are well aware, I have been strongly and consistently against
this asinine idea since it was first proposed; I don't have the energy
to repeat myself in every new forum where you repeat it.
Just because "asinine" is a fancy word it is no less
On Fri, 30 Sept 2022 at 13:46, Mateusz Konieczny via talk
wrote:
> Sep 30, 2022, 14:32 by a...@pigsonthewing.org.uk:
>
> On Fri, 30 Sept 2022 at 13:08, Mateusz Konieczny via talk
> wrote:
>
> It was proposed on
>
Sep 30, 2022, 14:55 by marc_m...@mailo.com:
> Hello,
>
> Le 30.09.22 à 14:42, Mateusz Konieczny via talk a écrit :
>
>> Not entirely sure what should be done differently.
>>
>
> if you want to vote on "hide", use an url and a title with *hide*,
> as you did.
> but not a "it's hide but
Hello,
Le 30.09.22 à 14:42, Mateusz Konieczny via talk a écrit :
Not entirely sure what should be done differently.
if you want to vote on "hide", use an url and a title with *hide*,
as you did.
but not a "it's hide but somewhere i said that hive mean I 'll
delete it", that's unfair and imho
Sep 30, 2022, 14:32 by a...@pigsonthewing.org.uk:
> On Fri, 30 Sept 2022 at 13:08, Mateusz Konieczny via talk
> wrote:
>
>> It was proposed on
>> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Wiki#Remove_wikidata_parameters_from_infoboxes
>> and noone was against, so I have run it
>>
>
> As you
Hi,
Well the original import from many years ago actually reflected the
residential areas instead of the real boundaries. Now there is correct data.
User ted3sco added some boundaries about two years ago and apparently didn't
finish it. Probably this requires a lot of manual work. I can't
Sep 30, 2022, 14:08 by frede...@remote.org:
> Hi,
>
> On 30.09.22 13:36, Frederik Ramm wrote:
>
>> You can't have people vote on one thing and then do something else.
>>
>
> It occurs to me that this is what usually happens in politics. Still, we
> should aim to be better ;)
>
And to be
On Fri, 30 Sept 2022 at 13:08, Mateusz Konieczny via talk
wrote:
> It was proposed on
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Wiki#Remove_wikidata_parameters_from_infoboxes
> and noone was against, so I have run it
As you are well aware, I have been strongly and consistently against
this
Sep 30, 2022, 14:08 by matkoni...@tutanota.com:
> (note that bot edits on OSM Wiki are often done without any
> requests/proposals,
> and my habit of actually proposing it and waiting two weeks before running it
> is more than done in general)
>
See also
Sep 30, 2022, 13:36 by frede...@remote.org:
> "It will not lead to any data loss, but will make Wikidata link far less
> prominent."
>
> "Make link far less prominent" is not the same as "delete link".
>
This proposal had
"Remove rendering of Wikidata external links from bottom of the infobox"
Hi,
On 30.09.22 13:36, Frederik Ramm wrote:
You can't have people vote on one thing and then do something else.
It occurs to me that this is what usually happens in politics. Still, we
should aim to be better ;)
--
Frederik Ramm ## eMail frede...@remote.org ## N49°00'09" E008°23'33"
Hi,
On 30.09.22 12:59, Marc_marc wrote:
do we really want the community to waste its time remaking
a wikidata-osm out of ego not to use wikidata.org when
it describes the same concept?
I think that there is a danger of confusion here because Wikidata has
its own ideas about what a tree is
It would be better to discuss it at Wiki, but I can respond here.
> because for some tags, the item described by the tag was not the same
> as the one described by the wikidata item (in my opinion it is better
> to only delete the erroneous links instead of hiding everything)
not really
see
Hello,
a few months ago, the community unfortunately voted [|] to "remove
alphanumeric code visible in infoboxes at OSM Wiki linking to Wikidata"
because for some tags, the item described by the tag was not the same
as the one described by the wikidata item (in my opinion it is better
to only
24 matches
Mail list logo
