Re: [Talk-ca] Ft. McMurry Fires

03.4095 | Cell 510.842.7523 | Skype dkunce​ > > > > > > > > On 5/9/16, 12:21 PM, "John Marshall" <rps...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >Dale, > > > >I have ask the CDN Red Cross in Ottawa several times if they would > >like the CDN OSM comm

Re: [Talk-ca] Ft. McMurry Fires

Hi Dale I'm not sure if you've been following this list previously, but there was a initiative started already within osm-canada I've created a HOT project here: http://tasks.osmcanada.ca/project/22 But right now OSM is in read only mode as there is a scheduled maintenance On May 9, 2016 12:12

Re: [Talk-ca] ftp2.cits.rncan.gc.ca

Seems to be back up for now: http://ftp2.cits.rncan.gc.ca/OSM/pub/ On Sun, May 8, 2016 at 9:43 PM, Stewart C. Russell wrote: > Looks like with all the shuffling of products, we've finally lost our > /OSM/pub folder. Oh well. > > I guess that, since all the CanVEC data is now

Re: [Talk-ca] ftp2.cits.rncan.gc.ca

If you remember what François Paquette sent on this list you wouldnt have to send the email you just sent: The CanVec data in OSM format will not be available from Thursday May 5, 1:00 p.m. to Tuesday May 10, 9:00 a.m. (Eastern Time). The maintenance period may be modified, please refer to the

Re: [Talk-ca] Fort McMurray forest fires

ry building, Ottawa certainly does. The roads and highways are also > available in CANVEC for firefighters etc. > > Cheerio John > > On 5 May 2016 at 11:45, James <james2...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I've created a task on my tasking manager for buildings in Fort McMurray. >

Re: [Talk-ca] Fort McMurray forest fires

I think we'll have to wait until the fire is put out before we get satelite imagery. What I can do is create a task on tasks.osmcanada.ca for Fort McMurray and we can trace buildings as they are not all there On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 11:28 AM, Andrew MacKinnon wrote: > As you

Re: [Talk-us] US 221 (NC) Median U-Turns

That is called a "Superstreet" [1]. NC seems to love these, as I've seen it pop up alone NC-73 recently near it's interchanges with both I-77 & I-85. -James [1] - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superstreet From: Mike N <nice...@att.

Re: [Talk-ca] Données ouvertes de Shawinigan, QC

autre probleme Ottawa a la meme clause et fait en sorte que ce n'est pas compatible On Apr 25, 2016 6:51 PM, "James" <james2...@gmail.com> wrote: > Chu pas un avocat, mais > Cette partie pourrais causer des troubles > > "Vous reconnaissez que cette licence ne vous ac

Re: [Talk-ca] Données ouvertes de Shawinigan, QC

Chu pas un avocat, mais Cette partie pourrais causer des troubles "Vous reconnaissez que cette licence ne vous accorde pas de droits d’auteur ou de propriété sur les données. Si vous diffusez ou donnez accès à ces données à un tiers, vous vous engagez à inclure une copie des présentes conditions

Re: [Talk-us] Talk-us Digest, Vol 101, Issue 10

should be good to go here. [] -James (rickmastfan67) https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/rickmastfan67 [1] - <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:area?uselang=en-US> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:area [2] - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building [3] -

Re: [Talk-us] Best way to contacting users who are taking a class, but are possibly damaging data at same time?

I noticed it via my RSS feed of Pittsburgh area changes. Wasn't too hard to put 2+2 together when the same changeset comment kept popping up today with different users. -James From: Martijn van Exel <m...@rtijn.org> Sent: Monday, April 11, 2016 6:49

[Talk-us] Best way to contacting users who are taking a class, but are possibly damaging data at same time?

s some new mappers. -James [1] - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/BradleyMann [2] - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/gdelre [3] - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/catiehamel [4] - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/glo6735 [5] - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Cortazzo [

Re: [Talk-ca] Gouvernement du Québec et Municipalités : Nouveau portail et licence ouverte

Scuse j'ai oublié le ne et le pas On Apr 6, 2016 3:33 PM, "Charles Basenga Kiyanda" < perso...@charleskiyanda.com> wrote: > Le lien fourni dit que les licenses ODC-ODbl-1.0 et CC-BY-4.0 sont > INcompatibles. Est-ce que j'ai mal lu l'information? > > Charles > > O

Re: [Talk-ca] Gouvernement du Québec et Municipalités : Nouveau portail et licence ouverte

Les licenses ODC-ODbL-1.0 et CC-BY-4.0 sont compatibles. http://clipol.org/licences/70?tab=licence_compatibility 2016-04-06 13:49 GMT-04:00 Charles Basenga Kiyanda < perso...@charleskiyanda.com>: > Ce que je comprends, toutefois, c'est que c'est la clause d'attribution > qui est problématique

Re: [Talk-us] Caliparks re-tagging paths?

?  There should be.  I think institutional engagement with OSM can bring many benefits, but has similar dangers as imports.  James On Thu, 2016-03-24 at 13:50 +0100, Frederik Ramm wrote: > Hi, > > On 03/24/2016 11:26 AM, Marc Gemis wrote: > > > > They tagged them as "social_path

Re: [Talk-ca] bus stops, post codes and rent-a-crowd

Postal codes have already been suggested a long time ago http://open.canada.ca/en/suggested-datasets/postal-code-database On Mar 16, 2016 8:22 PM, "john whelan" wrote: > ​Mojgan recently identified that data from the government of Canada’s open > data portal could be

Re: [Talk-ca] bus stops, post codes and rent-a-crowd

ce > given was every added request at the moment helps. > > Thanks John > > On 16 March 2016 at 20:26, James <james2...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Postal codes have already been suggested a long time ago >> http://open.canada.ca/en/suggested-datasets/postal-code-database &

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] ECJ confirmed 96/9/EG for printed maps

If someone could remove me from the email list that would be great. Could not find an unsub button. Many thanks James Sent from my iPhone > On 14 Mar 2016, at 15:20, Tom Lee <t...@mapbox.com> wrote: > > I think this conversation is suffering from a few confusions. >

Re: [Talk-ca] Bus stops in Ottawa

There's also the problem: how do you know that the bus stop was from an import vs user created. On Feb 28, 2016 8:48 PM, "john whelan" wrote: > I think with the clause in the uploading terms that OSM can change the > license its very difficult to import anything as it is

Re: [Talk-ca] Bus stops in Ottawa

n the area would be better suited to updating these > points. > > On Sun, Feb 28, 2016 at 5:37 PM, James <james2...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Most of the STO bus stations were manually added by myself, not sure if >> there were any added/changed after the fact >>

Re: [Talk-ca] Bus stops in Ottawa

Most of the STO bus stations were manually added by myself, not sure if there were any added/changed after the fact On Feb 28, 2016 4:02 PM, "john whelan" wrote: > So it sounds like essentially we are saying the import wasn't discussed at > least as far as what the tags

[OSRM-talk] Memory Leak?

machine.RunQuery(route_parameters, json_result); } } Not a lot to it, therefore I'm wondering if the memory leak is in the RunQuery function and if so, how can I minimise the issue. Kind Regards James ___ OSRM-talk mailing list OSRM-talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/osrm-talk

Re: [OSRM-talk] RunQuery Output

Daniel. Thank you for that, found it and it works a treat. One more question for you: would OSRM benefit speed wise if it ran on a GPU? Regards On 15-Feb-16 10:03 PM, Daniel Patterson wrote: James, There's an updated example client here: https://github.com/Project-OSRM/osrm-backend/blob

Re: [Talk-ca] Metrolinx: OSM Golden Horseshoe Address Data

If you need a HOT task manager. I am currently hosting it on tasks.osmcanada.ca. If you want to become a project manager just send me an email after you've logged in, I can set you as one. On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 1:53 PM, john whelan wrote: > The issue has come up in

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] giving credit

They said that would be fine. I am going to register a dedicated account for this and first create a list of possible imports for your review. On Saturday, November 7, 2015 5:14 AM, Simon Poole wrote: Typically we credit on

[OSM-legal-talk] Reposting

It seems that my mails are being blocked to this list. I would like to start fresh and focus on improving OSM.  So I have been reviewing potential imports/comparisons of the new jersey data.  They would like a :"Acknowledgement of the data set provider, the New Jersey  Office of Information

Re: [Talk-us] CrossCountryRoads.com

And I would be that "James Mast" that Alex mentioned. ;) -James (rickmastfan67) > Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2015 10:27:06 -0500 > From: ethnicfoodisgr...@gmail.com > To: talk-us@openstreetmap.org > Subject: Re: [Talk-us] CrossCountryRoads.com > > > Message: 1 > >

Re: [Talk-GB] Secondary, tertiary and unclassified

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 04/11/15 13:31, Andy Townsend wrote: > On 04/11/2015 12:54, James Tait wrote: >> ... I stumbled upon a changeset[1] that highlighted questions >> I already had about the tagging of roads in Mickleover. > > I'd tend to agree th

Re: [Talk-GB] Secondary, tertiary and unclassified

uld be a trunk road, and the A516 might be primary. JT [0] http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/26773899 [1] https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/25091307 - -- - ---+ James Tait, BSc|xmpp:jayte...@wyrd

Re: [Talk-ca] Cycling map vs Standard map

Any other layer apart from the standard layer takes more time to render(it's deliberately delayed) so if you have made changes recently that show up on the standard layer but not on the cycle map you might have to wait a couple days for the cycle layer to catch up (usually 2-3 days) On Tue, Nov

[Talk-us] Downgrading 'motorways' around toll plazas?

hat option is a last resort. -James [1] - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/34537712 [2] - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/34532178 [3] - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/34144759 [4] - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/34237498 [5] - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changese

[Talk-ca] CanVec+

I was just wondering if anyone knew that CanVec data is being phased out and replaced by CanVec+. I spoke with Marc LeMaire from NRCan and he said that they will not be offering .osm conversions of CanVec+ data, which means that we will have to convert the shapefiles ourselves. My question is has

Re: [Talk-us] User HomocideBaltimore adding fake / fictional / old data all over Baltimore

Not all 200 changesets are in Baltimore. He's done the same thing in Charlotte, NC. He's deleted interchanges (sometimes making them at-grade), completely deleted the northern segments of I-485, and other damaging stuff. All his changesets need to be reverted ASAP!! -James From: elliott.pl

Re: [Talk-us] Request revert on Changeset #33669446

apologize to jakeroot since the editing program is to blame there. [2] -James [1] - https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD [2] - https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/issues/908 Date: Sat, 5 Sep 2015 09:28:00 -0500 From: ba...@ursamundi.org To: rickmastfa...@hotmail.com CC: d...@osmfoundation.org

Re: [Talk-us] Request revert on Changeset #33669446

is now currently on version 23. If I was part of the DWG, I would recommend making you apologize to jakeroot before you could continue editing anything because of that. If you didn't realize Paul, you're kinda acting like NE2 right now when it comes to this. -James (rickmastfan67) From: burke

[Talk-us] Anybody had any contact with this user?

). I'd just wish he'd respond back to me on the 'changeset comment' part. :( -James ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us

Re: [Talk-us] Regent Square, PA

I'll pass along a note to a fellow Pittsburgh mapper that is from that area to see what he can do about this. -James Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2015 09:13:47 +0200 From: frede...@remote.org To: talk-us@openstreetmap.org Subject: [Talk-us] Regent Square, PA Hi, (resent from correct address

Re: [Talk-ca] Fwd: Ottawa, Canada import

I got an email back from the guy handling the Licensing. Hi James, thank-you for the email. I’m not sure I understand the compatibility grid. Is there a particular issue you are concerned about? Note: we have plans to adapt the Open Government License Canada but have not been able to do

Re: [Talk-ca] Fwd: Ottawa, Canada import

Email I got after I said I will be unable to use the data due to incompatible licensing: James, I’m going to forward this inquiry on to Robert Giggey. He is in charge of the Open Data program at the City. I must say, I am a little surprised that this interpretation is so restrictive. I

Re: [Talk-us] Arm chair mapping challenges

contact Arun Ganesh [1] [2] since he's supposedly in charge of them per their profiles about all of this. -James [1] - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mapbox#Mapbox_Data_Team [2] - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/PlaneMad From: t...@fitchdesign.com Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2015 07:27:15 -0700

[Talk-ca] Fwd: Ottawa, Canada import

Hello everyone, I was informed that before any kind of data import was to be approved by the community. Unfortunately I have imported a bit of data into openstreetmap and for this I am sorry. but I did receive approval from the city that we could import data from data.ottawa.ca/dataset. Which I

[Talk-ca] Ottawa, Canada import

Hello everyone, I was informed that before any kind of data import was to be approved by the community. Unfortunately I have imported a bit of data into openstreetmap and for this I am sorry. but I did receive approval from the city that we could import data from data.ottawa.ca/dataset. Which I

Re: [Talk-us] Tagging National Forests

as forests, they are certainly internally quite heterogenuous in terms of the landuse to the point where many areas are not actually being managed as tree growing areas. James On Mon, 2015-08-17 at 21:06 +0200, Wolfgang Zenker wrote: Assuming we keep landuse=forest for the National Forests, what

Re: [Talk-ca] Looking for competent OSM editors to improve the map on Toronto area and Toronto PATH

Check out: http://www1.toronto.ca/wps/portal/contentonly?vgnextoid=1a66e03bb8d1e310VgnVCM1071d60f89RCRD It's their open data portal which also includes the building address shapefile(not sure how accurate this is, I know Ottawa's has about 30% errors (overlapping duplicate nodes, misplaced

[Talk-us] Does anybody know if these PA maps are legal to use to get info from for OSM?

to contact him to see if he'll respond to you and maybe finally post here on [talk-us], be my guest since he's just ignoring me. -James [1] - https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/14238074 [2] - https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-us/2015-January/014157.html [3] - https

[Talk-us] Am I mapping this wrong, or should the router be fixed for this?

to come along later and add the buildings/service ways that connect to the main highway. Saves them time too. -James From: t...@fitchdesign.com Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2015 22:13:53 -0700 To: yourvillagem...@yahoo.com CC: talk-us@openstreetmap.org Subject: Re: [Talk-us] Am I mapping this wrong, or should

Re: [Talk-us] Am I mapping this wrong, or should the router be fixed for this?

/1501 -James To: talk-us@openstreetmap.org From: nice...@att.net Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2015 13:20:50 -0400 Subject: Re: [Talk-us] Am I mapping this wrong, or should the router be fixed for this? 2) There should be some cost in a routing engine for making a u-turn so as to discourage

[Talk-us] Am I mapping this wrong, or should the router be fixed for this?

simple one-node intersections as-is)? I'm very curious to see what others have to say about this to see how I'll move forward when I map in the future. Also, don't hesitate to respond at the Google Group post or the GitHub one too as I get the e-mail notifications from them as well. -James

[OSM-talk] Am I mapping this wrong, or should the router be fixed for this?

simple one-node intersections as-is)? I'm very curious to see what others have to say about this to see how I'll move forward when I map in the future. Also, don't hesitate to respond at the Google Group post or the GitHub one too as I get the e-mail notifications from them as well. -James

Re: [Talk-ca] Highway 400A

You could always add the '400A' part to the 'unsigned_ref' tag because of it being mentioned in the traffic volume documents. -James Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 07:14:52 -0700 From: berniejconn...@gmail.com To: andersontris...@hotmail.com CC: talk-ca@openstreetmap.org Subject: Re: [Talk-ca] Highway

Re: [Talk-ca] Forestry Roads

http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:highway Should be track Roads for mostly agricultural or forestry uses. To describe the quality of a track, see tracktype=*. Note: Although tracks are often rough with unpaved surfaces, this tag is not describing the quality of a road but its use.

[Talk-ca] GeoBase Import

Has anyone else had issues with the conversion script from GML to osm? I've been looking at the wiki here: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Geobase/Import_How-To and when I try to convert the data python gives me the : UnicodeDecodeError: 'ascii' codec can't decode byte 0xae in position 2:

Re: [Talk-ca] Canadian Arctic Island Naming Languages

Thanks James and John for the info. We are running our own Mapnik rendering server and I will look into the options for displaying specific languages as labels. I will also look into adding the alternate language tags with help from the Arctic Institute. Sincerely, James Badger On Jul 6

[Talk-ca] Canadian Arctic Island Naming Languages

(or names in the indigenous languages). Sincerely, James -- James Badger E.I.T. Research Associate GeoSensorWeb Lab Department of Geomatics Engineering Schulich School of Engineering University of Calgary 2500 University Drive NW Calgary, Alberta T2N 1N4 http://sensorweb.geomatics.ucalgary.ca

Re: [Talk-ca] Canadian Arctic Island Naming Languages

PM, James Parker Badger jpbad...@ucalgary.ca wrote: Hello, I am working at the University of Calgary on a project that is using OpenStreetMap data to provide a mapping service for Arctic researchers. We chose to use OpenStreetMap as we would like to encourage communities to contribute

Re: [Talk-ca] Low quality unresolvable notes

I'd say close them with a comment. Some of them are actually precise, saying like : no rtor eb. Which is more than enough data. General things like: add POIs at this location. Could be closed as the entirety of osm could be summed in a widespread note saying: Add mapping data. You can use your

Re: [Talk-ca] ON prefix

to the [talk-ca] list and talk about it. Plus I do honestly think both North American Highways and osm_validation_and_improvements are the same person. Use the same version of JOSM, and same 'source' tag on the changesets. -James From: rickmastfa...@hotmail.com To: andrew...@gmail.com; talk-ca

Re: [Talk-ca] ON prefix

If this is the 2nd time he's done it, I'd report him to the DWG. -James Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2015 10:50:06 -0400 From: andrew...@gmail.com To: talk-ca@openstreetmap.org Subject: [Talk-ca] ON prefix User:osm_validation_and_improvements made mechanical edits to add the ON prefix to Ontario

Re: [Talk-ca] Ref tags in Ontario

to the mailing list. Hopefully he'll respond back to me or post here. For all I know, he could be the same user above with a new account as he added the 'ON' back to the ref tag on the 400 [2]. He's also had QEW edits reverted 'TWICE' where he added the 'ON' to the ref tag. [3] -James [1] - https

Re: [Talk-ca] Ref tags in Ontario

they have done for all of the US state highways. [2] They base the rendering of shields off of the 'ref' tag, not relations, mainly because most states don't have all of their relations done yet either (all US highways and Interstates in all states are already done). -James [1] - https

[Talk-ca] Ref tags in Ontario

I've been noticing that a user has been adding the prefix of 'ON' to the ref tags on ways recently in Ontario. Are you starting to do that now, or is this user in error with the current tagging practices? -James

Re: [Talk-us] a plea to armchair mappers

Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2015 07:01:35 -0500 From: ba...@ursamundi.org To: talk-us@openstreetmap.org Subject: Re: [Talk-us] a plea to armchair mappers On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 9:08 PM, James Mast rickmastfa...@hotmail.com wrote: Maybe we should invite the MapBox paid mappers to join

Re: [Talk-us] a plea to armchair mappers

Maybe we should invite the MapBox paid mappers to join in this conversation? They are the major people doing this. -James Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2015 21:10:58 -0400 From: nice...@att.net To: talk-us@openstreetmap.org Subject: Re: [Talk-us] a plea to armchair mappers On 6/11/2015 12:46 PM

Re: [Talk-us] Deletion rampage by a certain user

those mass deletions. -James [1] - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/28817008 [2] - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/28817008 [3] - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/29738098 [4] - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/31293156

Re: [OSM-talk] Chain Store Cleanup

a note for them to be field checked if the building design doesn't match any of the normal designs, or is inside a gas station/WalMart and can't be verified for sure since those locations can/do change often sometimes to another brand. -James

Re: [OSM-talk] [Talk-us] PennLive.com using OSM without attribution?

It's been fixed. Thanks for handling the e-mail part Hans. -James From: hans.dekryge...@gmail.com Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2015 05:55:34 -0700 To: rickmastfa...@hotmail.com CC: talk@openstreetmap.org; talk...@openstreetmap.org Subject: Re: [Talk-us] PennLive.com using OSM without attribution? Just

Re: [Talk-us] PennLive.com using OSM without attribution?

It's been fixed. Thanks for handling the e-mail part Hans. -James From: hans.dekryge...@gmail.com Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2015 05:55:34 -0700 To: rickmastfa...@hotmail.com CC: t...@openstreetmap.org; talk-us@openstreetmap.org Subject: Re: [Talk-us] PennLive.com using OSM without attribution? Just

[Talk-us] PennLive.com using OSM without attribution?

Turnpike. My question is, is this allowed with the current license, or do they still need to have the attribution on the image (or right below it)? If somebody that is more knowledgeable in this would like to contact them about this if they are in the wrong, please, be my guest. -James

[OSM-talk] PennLive.com using OSM without attribution?

Turnpike. My question is, is this allowed with the current license, or do they still need to have the attribution on the image (or right below it)? If somebody that is more knowledgeable in this would like to contact them about this if they are in the wrong, please, be my guest. -James

Re: [OSM-talk] Query Overpass for multiple small areas

Yup, exactly, I was running many small queries in parallel. Aggregating them into one query resolved it. If the query bbox grows too big--right now looking at ~60% of the DRC, but will need to expand the query to run across all of the Congo Basin--then I'll divide into country-sized queries but

Re: [OSM-talk] Query Overpass for multiple small areas

Yeah, that all makes sense. I had spent a lot of time trying to limit the area I was searching against, and the result was a *429 Too Many Requests* error. Thanks Bryce and Roland. On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 2:42 AM, Roland Olbricht roland.olbri...@gmx.de wrote: Hi all, Was unsure what the

[OSM-talk] Query Overpass for multiple small areas

Hi all, Was unsure what the best practices for querying overpass were, and was wondering if someone could point me in a good direction. I'm trying to query Overpass for a small amount of data over many small, sparsely populated areas. Was wondering if it made more sense to run separate queries

Re: [Talk-ca] ON prefix on Ontario highways

the higher number series used to be under municipal jurisdiction, now it's provincial. Badging is still the same as before the juggle. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Alberta_provincial_highways James VE6SRV ___ Talk-ca mailing list Talk-ca

Re: [Talk-us] Pennsylvania's quadrant routes

) -James ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us

Re: [Talk-us] Pennsylvania's quadrant routes

They all already have those types of relations. And the master relation for all of them is here: Pennsylvania Turnpike Network (3075726) https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3075726 -James Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2015 04:49:59 -0600 From: ba...@ursamundi.org To: rickmastfa...@hotmail.com CC: m

Re: [Talk-us] Pennsylvania's quadrant routes

Fully agree with you there Paul. Just have to watch out for those few 'rare' exceptions to the rule I mentioned before for the future 'ref:penndot' tag where some mainline route have different 'SR' numbers in the white boxes. -James Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2015 05:15:38 -0600 From: ba

Re: [Talk-us] Pennsylvania's quadrant routes

other cases like this, but I can't recall them right now, but some of them might be split state routes where one half is the base number, and the other half another number if there is no chance of them being joined. -James [1] - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pennsylvania_Route_380 [2] - http

[Talk-us] Pennsylvania's quadrant routes

a constant tagging scheme for them. -James [1] - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_State_Routes_in_Pennsylvania [2] - http://goo.gl/maps/NdVrn [3] - https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/311525727 [4] - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allegheny_County_belt_system

Re: [Talk-us] Pennsylvania's quadrant routes

Bryan, somebody else has already added this info as a suggestion on the 'State Route Relation' page [1]. He was one of the first people I talked to about this idea, and he's a fellow Pittsburgh mapper. -James [1] - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pennsylvania/State_Route_Relations

Re: [Talk-us] Bike route relation issues

thing seems strange. That is not a separate bike route but rather an interstate highway that allows bicycles. bicycle=yes on all the component ways should be sufficient. James On Sat, 2015-01-10 at 14:08 +, Richard Fairhurst wrote: Hi all, I've encountered two problematic bike route

[Talk-us] CDP tagging

). -James [1] - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/en:Carnot-Moon,%20Pennsylvania?uselang=en-US [2] - https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/38518599 [3] - https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/189136 ___ Talk-us mailing list

Re: [OSM-talk] Major licence violation by app myTrails?

Here's the only mentions of 'OpenStreetMap' on their site: http://www.frogsparks.com/?s=openstreetmaplang=en ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Re: [Talk-ca] Postal Codes

time figuring out the line of distinction between encumbered and unencumbered information sources. James VE6SRV ___ Talk-ca mailing list Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca

Re: [Talk-GB] View roadsigns in JOSM

The signs dont seem to be very up-to-date. The newest ones I can see are from October. Is this the same for everyone? ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb

Re: [Talk-us] State highway refs (was Re: New I.D Feature)

(US-19 Truck in the North Hills of Pittsburgh is 'SR 4003'). It keeps the info together, plus IMO, works better here since they aren't 'true' unsigned highways unlike in several Western states where you can't find any reference to a US highway on an Interstate most of the time. -James [1

Re: [Talk-us] State highway refs (was Re: New I.D Feature)

on roads they maintain, it says 'SR' (even on Interstates). However, PennDOT recently posted a nice little gem on PA-28 @ Exit #6 going both directions that goes back in time and mentions the 'PA' on the sign. [3] There are at least 3 of these signs (2 going SB, at least 1 going NB). -James

Re: [Talk-us] Directional suffixes on roads: yes or no?

Brian, I think you're confused here on this subject. We're talking about roads that have stuff like 'NW' [1] in the name on street signs. Nothing about divided roads. -James [1] - http://goo.gl/maps/wB8IR From: briane...@gmail.com Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2014 11:32:54 + To: elliott.pl

[Talk-us] User randomly adding speed limits across the US

. Heck, it could even lead to bad press if somebody gets a speeding ticket and they try to blame OSM for it because of the incorrect speed limit in the database. -James [1] - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/msheerin17/history [2] - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/24355862 [3] - https

Re: [Talk-us] New I.D Feature

. This also goes for the 'network' tag (network=US:FL) for state highways relations. -James ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us

Re: [Talk-us] State highway refs (was Re: New I.D Feature)

, if you see a tag like ref=US 17;25 in either of those states on a way, go for it and fix it for the better (ref=US 17;GA 25). Just don't do anything automated without talking about it here on [talk-us] first of course. -James From: skqu...@rushpost.com To: talk-us@openstreetmap.org Date: Sun

Re: [OSM-talk] Changeset comment function

I like! Do you know if people comment on a changeset you make, will you automatically get an e-mail mentioning said comment, or will you be in the dark and have to stumble across said comment? -James ___ talk

Re: [Talk-us] multiple-value problem in ref tags

' at the same time. MapQuest developed their rendering scheme on how we were using the ref tags already. Thus, this isn't technically 'tagging for the renderer' because we were already not using a space after the ';' in the ref tags. -James [1] - https://groups.google.com/d/topic/osmand/k2Rf59wUiSE

[Talk-us] User going around adding '-' to ref tags in Michigan

some 'reverting' work already putting them back to the normal standard. [2] -James [1] - https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/8767860/history [2] - https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/17729896/history ___ Talk-us

[Talk-ca] Bing updated imagery in Windsor, Ontario

Just wanted to give you guys a heads up in anybody wanted to do a massive cleanup of the new 401 construction in that area. According to JOSM, the imagery Bing now has is about 3 months old taken between 05/31/14 and 06/15/14. So, if anybody feels like having some fun, have at it. ;) -James

Re: [OSM-talk] Detrimental to the OSM database

in the future Martijn? -James [1] - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/22050738 [2] - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/22262496 ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org

Re: [Talk-ca] [Talk-us] exit_to vs destination

the following pages: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/mvexel/diary/22419 https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/mvexel/diary/23369 -James From: marti...@telenav.com Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2014 16:58:37 -0600 To: talk...@openstreetmap.org Subject: [Talk-us] exit_to vs destination Hi all, http

Re: [Talk-us] exit_to vs destination

the following pages: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/mvexel/diary/22419 https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/mvexel/diary/23369 -James From: marti...@telenav.com Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2014 16:58:37 -0600 To: talk-us@openstreetmap.org Subject: [Talk-us] exit_to vs destination Hi all, http

Re: [Talk-us] exit_to vs destination

CC'ing in [Talk-ca] since they (at least in Ontario) don't even use the exit_to or destination tags and put everything in the 'name' tag on 'motorway_junction's. Thinking it would be a good time to see if we can get them on the same page as well. -James

Re: [OSM-talk] Upcoming openstreetmap-carto changes

I just hope that the 'tertiary_link' casing problem can be fixed soon. In some places, that looks horrible. ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Re: [OSM-talk] Upcoming openstreetmap-carto changes

I just hope that the 'tertiary_link' casing problem can be fixed soon. In some places, that looks horrible. https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues/753 -James

<    2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   >