Hendrik T. Voelker wrote:
So we have to come up with a way to contain alternating versions with time or
other kind of restrictions. This would also allow construction sites to be
mapped.
---8---
timecapsule
frame from=1.1.2009 till=5.1.2009
node ... /
way ... /
relation
Hi guys.
Peter Miller wrote:
This raises the whole question around temporary maps - ie for 50 weeks of
the year this is empty desert and for 2 weeks it looks like this.
Another example is Glastonbury Festival which for 50 weeks looks like
a farm and for 2 weeks is the second largest
Guys,
after we now had a longer discussion I guess several things are clear:
We agree that as a first step a code of conduct concerning mass changes is
a very good idea and maybe Frederik can draft one and add it to the wiki as a
proposal.
Following that most agree that a code of
Gert Gremmen wrote:
The serverscript (see below) could create a web page with the
temporary accountname as a URL, summarizing all the submitted data,
for consulting by anyone finding a questionable dataelement.
Guys, think about one of the most fundamental design principles for robust
code:
Gert Gremmen wrote:
I want to insist however, on the
website form approach, to oblige
fast-thinking fast-acting bot writers to
express at least what they intend to do somewhere.
Yes, sure. But not for every run of the bot.
And you can add a description to the batch
One could go as far as
Nick Barnes wrote:
'Hamm Strasse' - see link above). One of the guys there commented that
after he spent some time mapping an area called 'Batley Carr', some
numbskull thought it would be a good idea to correct all the
misspellings of 'car' and changed every single reference.
First of all
Am 18.09.2008 um 00:40 Uhr schrieb Cartinus:
seem to use k='type' v='something' to indicate what kind of relation it
is.
Nonetheless I think that it's redundant, as the existence of a group tag
should make it clear that this is a group :) Streets, houses, what ever do
The type tag is
Am 16.09.2008 um 22:30 Uhr schrieb Erik Lundin:
All established relations
seem to use k='type' v='something' to indicate what kind of relation it
is.
Yes, I have seen that. Because of that I had include the question. Nonetheless
I think that it's redundant, as the existence of a group tag
Am 16.09.2008 um 22:46 Uhr schrieb leblatt:
But if I try to convert from kml to gpx with GPSBabel, I get a
trackfilter-init: Found track point without time! error, and no conversion
occurs.
Well, maybe it would be enough to add timestamps to the KML file (by
hand/script) and then try to
Am 13.09.2008 um 19:17 Uhr schrieb Hendrik T Voelker:
just a short question:
How do I describe a group of islands, like e.g. the Ertenholmen (consists of
about 13 islands, islets, and archipelago in the Baltic Sea.
I would expect to use the relation for that
It seems there is not yet
= "006792";
google_color_text = "00";
//-->
[OSM-talk] Question: How to describe groups of islands.
Hendrik T Voelker
Re: [OSM-talk] Question: How to describe groups of islands.
Erik Lundin
Re: [OSM-talk] Question: How to describe groups of islands.
Nic Roet
e_color_url = "006792";
google_color_text = "00";
//-->
[OSM-talk] Question: How to describe groups of islands.
Hendrik T Voelker
Re: [OSM-talk] Question: How to describe groups of islands.
Erik Lundin
Re: [OSM-talk] Question: How to describe groups of islands.
Nic R
e_color_url = "006792";
google_color_text = "00";
//-->
[OSM-talk] Question: How to describe groups of islands.
Hendrik T Voelker
Re: [OSM-talk] Question: How to describe groups of islands.
Erik Lundin
Re: [OSM-talk] Question: How to describe groups of islands.
Nic Ro
13 matches
Mail list logo
