Yes, Maperitive would be ideal. Although the SVG export is not yet done,
quality (ie large) bitmaps can be done with a scale command to smooth
out pixellation.
http://maperitive.net/
Join the Google group and we'll help you out! :-)
You might also like to have a look at Maposmatic
...@openstreetmap.org [mailto:talk-boun...@openstreetmap.org]
On Behalf Of Gervase Markham
Sent: 06 June 2010 15:45
To: talk@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Custom rendering of a small map
On 06/06/10 13:52, Seventy 7 wrote:
Yes, Maperitive would be ideal. Although the SVG export is not yet done
Ævar wrote:
You'll probably like this one better, it takes the concept of insert
neat stuff here even further, just add imagination:
http://v.nix.is/~avar/insert-neater-stuff-here.png
Lol! Reminds me of a Dilbert cartoon The Technology Demo. Dilbert, the nerdy
engineer, is presenting
mailto:o...@raggedred.net wrote:
Seventy 7 wrote:
Can someone tell us what's happening with the latest release of
OS data please? When streetview came out there were quite a few
emails about tiles being rendered for tracing etc but this time
it's all been very quiet
I agree and I raised exactly the same question here
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=4141
I changed one of the loops to see if it would work but it was promptly changed
back again.
However, I still think that route=ncn is right.
Perhaps we should vote?
Steve
Can someone tell us what's happening with the latest release of OS data please?
When streetview came out there were quite a few emails about tiles being
rendered for tracing etc but this time it's all been very quiet!
I presume someone somewhere is doing the vector data, but what about the
The buildings have been tagged as both building=yes and landuse=residential and
I think this will be confusing the renderer - landuse is used for areas and the
buildings (and everything else) sit on top.
So tag the general area as landuse=residential (a few ways to do this) and just
tag the
blatant lieYeah, me too. I was just about to do that!
/blatant lie
Fantastic!
- Original Message -
From: Graham Jones
To: TimSC
Cc: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] building shapes from OS Street View
Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2010 22:32:40 +0100
Hi Tim,That is
What odd choices OS have made in releasing this data! I've not had a good look
until now, so I've only just realised that they've had all these layers and
decided which to release and which to remove.
So they've removed paths but kept their names, removed parks but kept the water
and wooded
... but there's a feeling that if we just dive in straight away and start
tracing/importing willy-nilly we'll just shoot ourselves in the foot.
Yes, but Tim only mentioned tracing, not importing.
The Wiki is clearly out of date. It says that We are still assessing the open
data releases but
I was going to say something like Double quick time?? We've been waiting over
28 hours!! ;-), but actually I know that as soon as these layers become
available then editing will consume my life!
So, no rush ;-)
S
- Original Message -
From: Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net
What's happening with the imports at the moment, are they progressing?
North Yorkshire would be useful for me, well York and the area north as far as
Thirsk anyway (~ 25 miles).
Regards,
Steve
- Original Message -
From: Christoph Böhme christ...@b3e.net
To: Tom Chance
So mtb:scale=5 would be a vertical cliff?
Have you seen the video that plays in the Blacks outdoor shops?? Yes would be
the answer! Incredible.
--
___
Surf the Web in a faster, safer and easier way:
Download Opera 9 at http://www.opera.com
grin :D
Any clues or teasers as to what this might contain?
- Original Message -
From: Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net
To: talk@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] JOSM will move to Java6
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2010 02:23:00 -0800 (PST)
Frederik Ramm wrote:
If you
14 matches
Mail list logo