Thanks Andrew,
I've reached out to the user on a changeset, and will hopefully have a
good conversation about it.
In the meantime, I've found about 30-50 intersections with these
duplicate ways and lanes. Would it be useful to add notes, or fix me
tags to those intersections? I'm wary about
Thanks Andrew, that was my last understanding as well. In particular,
modeling right hand turns as separate, curved ways when there is no
separate roadway.
Here are of changesets which introduce the types of issues I mentioned.
They mostly seem to be around dual carriageways.
Hi,
I'm relatively new, but I wanted to bring something g to your attention.
I came across a couple of intersections that seemed overly complicated;
they had lots of turn lanes drawn and were very messy. I created an
account, learned the standards for intersections and tried my best to
fix
On 29/08/18 21:21, Jubal Harpster wrote:
Rosneath Castle Caravan Park
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/92291906
https://goo.gl/maps/5zn1EEXwYER2
https://binged.it/2BCrYOr
OSM has the name on the actual caravan park, which sounds more likely:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/114942183
On 18/09/17 at 12:53pm, Philip Barnes wrote:
>There was a talk by 'the only licensed drone pilot in Scotland' at SOTM
>Scotland a couple of years ago.
>
>I missed the outdoor demo as I went to the NLS map library.
Yes Paul has a eBee senseFly -
On 30/08/17 at 10:28am, Tom Hughes wrote:
> On 30/08/17 10:26, Tom Hughes wrote:
>
> > As best I can tell from wikipedia the new bridge is the M90 and under
> > motorway conditions with the old bridge presumably expected to carry
> > non-motorway traffic as the A9000.
>
> So from
On 04/08/17 at 09:20am, SK53 wrote:
>Around here (Nottingham) we generally put something like demolished:
>building=* on the old way. Particular ly useful if you have several active
>mappers not all knowing about recent demolitions.
This is exactly what we try and do in Edinburgh. An
On 28/05/17 at 11:54am, David Woolley wrote:
> On 28/05/17 10:24, Frederik Ramm wrote:
> > "The two Museum symbols at NU 00023 52563 and NT 99988 52538 are no
> > longer relevant as the museums closed several years ago and the area is
> > now private housing."
> >
> > I'll leave it to you to
On 20/09/16 at 11:28am, Donald wrote:
>If a building or road is removed, and nothing has replaced it, then i
>think it is good to have some sort of lifestyle prefix like
>demolished:building or removed:road, especially as they are usually still
>visible from aerial images.
>
>
On 10/05/16 at 08:59pm, Eric Grosso wrote:
> I removed the NCN names associated to the roads/paths in Edinburgh (at
> least until the City By-pass) modified this week-end and I also re-added
> the railway=abandoned parts as it was before tintin2873's edits --
> changeset #39226002.
>
> I
Dag-ge-dag,
Wat bezig zijnde met verbeteren van fouten volgens keep_right!, komt
nogal vaak de melding: This highway intersects the cycleway/footpath
#xyz but there is no junction node. Meestal komt dat omdat er een
fietspad naast de hoofdweg getekend is, en de knooppunten met zijwegen
niet
I've been working on improving the Barrie, Ontario area, and I'm
trying to figure out what is going on with/what to do about Lake
Simcoe.
There are multiple CanVec-imported ways that together make up a fairly
detailed, accurate representation of the lake. A single low-detail way
[1] is
On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 4:33 PM, Frank Steggink stegg...@steggink.org wrote:
The Canvec version is clearly better, so the lowres version can be deleted.
Ok, I've deleted the low-res version, including nodes that weren't
part of anything else. Thanks for the help.
13 matches
Mail list logo
