Martin, thank you. As mentioned, I am working on that internal deadline.
The draft is currently under review.
How was your Saturday morning? Mine was writing and reviewing these drafts
on Crimea and other topics. I warmly remind you that consensus building
does take time. We are very much making
Am Mo., 28. Jan. 2019 um 18:33 Uhr schrieb Heather Leson <
heat...@osmfoundation.org>:
> Dear Martin and Colleagues,
>
> Since December, the Board has attempted to draft a public response. We are
> still discussing. I provided an update in the board meeting of January 17,
> 2019 -
Am Mo., 7. Jan. 2019 um 21:23 Uhr schrieb Heather Leson <
heat...@osmfoundation.org>:
> Hi Andrew, thank you for your note. The OSMF Board was offline for the
> holiday season. We will be conferring on this topic and respond within the
> week.
>
> Thank you for your understanding
>
> Heather
>
Will the board be following up with additional information as promised?
--
Andrew
From: Martijn van Exel
Sent: 10 December 2018 16:55:42
To: OSM Talk; OSMF Talk
Cc: OSMF Board
Subject: [Osmf-talk] Board decision on Crimea complaint
Hi all,
On November 17, the
"When in doubt, also consider the "on the ground rule": map the world as it
can be observed by someone physically there."
source: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/How_We_Map
- no further comment -
## Manfred Reiter - mobile -
## please excuse typos and brevity
Am Mo., 10. Dez. 2018, 11:58
Yeah it will be interesting to see what the board has to say about this in
more detail. I think on the whole I'm glad the decision has gone this way. In
my mind the case of Crimea has hung in the balance with very strong arguments
in favour of both approaches.
I have great respect for the way
On 2018-12-11 11:41, Frederik Ramm wrote:
Hi,
On 11.12.2018 11:16, Andrew Hain wrote:
A question both to the current board and the candidates: Do you
support
normal levels of Board transparency on this issue?
Just as a "data point" in this discussion: There are people out there
who are
Hi Frederik,
Can there be a transparency on death treats too?
On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 1:42 PM Frederik Ramm wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 11.12.2018 11:16, Andrew Hain wrote:
> > A question both to the current board and the candidates: Do you support
> > normal levels of Board transparency on this
Hi,
On 11.12.2018 11:16, Andrew Hain wrote:
> A question both to the current board and the candidates: Do you support
> normal levels of Board transparency on this issue?
Just as a "data point" in this discussion: There are people out there
who are happy to issue death threats to anyone who is
A question both to the current board and the candidates: Do you support normal
levels of Board transparency on this issue?
--
Andrew
From: Martijn van Exel
Sent: 10 December 2018 16:55:42
To: OSM Talk; OSMF Talk
Cc: OSMF Board
Subject: [Osmf-talk] Board decision
10 matches
Mail list logo
