Re: [OSM-talk] [Osmf-talk] ODBL vote (was Re: Enough is enough: disinfecting OSM from poisonous people)

2010-08-12 Thread Richard Fairhurst
[Apologies for continuing cross-post, please follow-up to OSM legal-talk.] Sam Vekemans wrote: So my question is weather or not, at a later date, I can change my choice (based on new information which would want me to change my mind).? As a general point, if you declare that something is

Re: [OSM-talk] [Osmf-talk] ODBL vote (was Re: Enough is enough: disinfecting OSM from poisonous people)

2010-08-12 Thread Sam Vekemans
Thread closed: On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 3:50 AM, Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net wrote: [Apologies for continuing cross-post, please follow-up to OSM legal-talk.] Sam Vekemans wrote: So my question is weather or not, at a later date,  I can change my choice (based on new information

Re: [OSM-talk] [Osmf-talk] ODBL vote (was Re: Enough is enough: disinfecting OSM from poisonous people)

2010-08-12 Thread MP
In the specific case of the OSM database, if you wanted to start doing this, you would probably need to establish a per-object licensing flag. This would require significant code changes and I assume you're not volunteering to do that. We can assume that user won't change his/her mind too

Re: [OSM-talk] [Osmf-talk] ODBL vote (was Re: Enough is enough: disinfecting OSM from poisonous people)

2010-08-12 Thread John Smith
On 12 August 2010 21:06, Sam Vekemans acrosscanadatra...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks, I have 2 accounts and can easily make the preference clear in my user profile description. Will there be a process to transfer ownership of a changeset between accounts if data is submitted under the wrong

Re: [OSM-talk] [Osmf-talk] ODBL vote (was Re: Enough is enough: disinfecting OSM from poisonous people)

2010-08-12 Thread John Smith
On 12 August 2010 21:52, MP singular...@gmail.com wrote: In the specific case of the OSM database, if you wanted to start doing this, you would probably need to establish a per-object licensing flag. This would require significant code changes and I assume you're not volunteering to do that.