Re: [OSM-talk] [Tagging] emergency=*

2010-08-02 Thread Eugene Alvin Villar
No one seems to have mentioned that any OSM API update could potentially break thousands of applications yet we still update it if needed. For example, the change to API 0.5 broke every tool, renderer or app that still assumed segments exist. (Then again, for this example, it was easier to change

Re: [OSM-talk] [Tagging] emergency=*

2010-08-02 Thread SomeoneElse
Ross Scanlon wrote: Total time 6 minutes Hundreds of hours, yeah right. So you've also updated every user of mkgmap who uses a customised style file too? That should add a few to the 20 or so (or whatever number were mentioned before). Each change is of the same order as the one that

Re: [OSM-talk] [Tagging] emergency=*

2010-08-02 Thread John Smith
On 3 August 2010 05:51, SomeoneElse li...@mail.atownsend.org.uk wrote: We've seen recently how people responding to disasters have used OSM data on handheld devices - someone right now could quite possibly be using such a map to try and deal with, say, the floods in Pakistan. If that map is

Re: [OSM-talk] [Tagging] emergency=*

2010-08-01 Thread Ulf Lamping
Am 31.07.2010 14:00, schrieb Peteris Krisjanis: 2010/7/31 Ulf Lampingulf.lamp...@googlemail.com: 4) Change it in every map renderer / router / other software that is out there - hundreds (or already even thousands?) of applications Really hunderds and thousands? I think it is more in tens

Re: [OSM-talk] [Tagging] emergency=*

2010-08-01 Thread Ross Scanlon
On Sun, 01 Aug 2010 16:08:10 +0200 Ulf Lamping ulf.lamp...@googlemail.com wrote: Am 31.07.2010 14:00, schrieb Peteris Krisjanis: 2010/7/31 Ulf Lampingulf.lamp...@googlemail.com: 4) Change it in every map renderer / router / other software that is out there - hundreds (or already even

Re: [OSM-talk] [Tagging] emergency=*

2010-08-01 Thread Peteris Krisjanis
2010/8/1 Ulf Lamping ulf.lamp...@googlemail.com: ... I know all costs, I have doubts about that. Ok, maybe I'm wrong (that's why I won't even try to change things without consensus), but return to root of all this - do you agree that we keep amenity=fire_hydrant and do nothing about it or we

Re: [OSM-talk] [Tagging] emergency=*

2010-08-01 Thread John Smith
On 2 August 2010 00:47, Peteris Krisjanis pec...@gmail.com wrote: Ok, maybe I'm wrong (that's why I won't even try to change things without consensus), but return to root of all this - do you agree that we keep amenity=fire_hydrant and do nothing about it or we try to introduce emergency=* at

Re: [OSM-talk] [Tagging] emergency=*

2010-08-01 Thread Ulf Lamping
Am 01.08.2010 16:40, schrieb Ross Scanlon: On Sun, 01 Aug 2010 16:08:10 +0200 Ulf Lampingulf.lamp...@googlemail.com wrote: Am 31.07.2010 14:00, schrieb Peteris Krisjanis: 2010/7/31 Ulf Lampingulf.lamp...@googlemail.com: Please remember, that it's not done to change only the software (e.g.

Re: [OSM-talk] [Tagging] emergency=*

2010-08-01 Thread Peteris Krisjanis
2010/8/1 Ulf Lamping ulf.lamp...@googlemail.com: Am 01.08.2010 16:40, schrieb Ross Scanlon: On Sun, 01 Aug 2010 16:08:10 +0200 Ulf Lampingulf.lamp...@googlemail.com  wrote: Am 31.07.2010 14:00, schrieb Peteris Krisjanis: 2010/7/31 Ulf Lampingulf.lamp...@googlemail.com: Please remember,

Re: [OSM-talk] [Tagging] emergency=*

2010-07-31 Thread Kevin Peat
Both the police and ambulance service spend a lot of their time on non-emergency items as do hospitals, doctors, etc. If you want to write an app that lists the police under an emergencies menu/button then go ahead but you don't need to change the OSM data to do it. Kevin On 30 July 2010

Re: [OSM-talk] [Tagging] emergency=*

2010-07-31 Thread Peteris Krisjanis
2010/7/31 Kevin Peat ke...@kevinpeat.com: Both the police and ambulance service spend a lot of their time on non-emergency items as do hospitals, doctors, etc.  If you want to write an app that lists the police under an emergencies menu/button then go ahead but you don't need to change the OSM

Re: [OSM-talk] [Tagging] emergency=*

2010-07-31 Thread Ulf Lamping
Am 31.07.2010 11:19, schrieb Peteris Krisjanis: If that can be solved introducing meaningful new name spaces like emergency, which could give easy way to filter emergency items, why not? What is cost of this? 1) Changing it in wiki - one day tops 2) Changing it in db - mass convertation, doable

Re: [OSM-talk] [Tagging] emergency=*

2010-07-31 Thread Brian Quinion
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 4:26 PM, Ross Scanlon i...@4x4falcon.com wrote: Total time 6 minutes Hundreds of hours, yeah right. What you have given is an absolute minimum time for someone who already understands to actually edit the files. You've skipped research, testing and deployment. The

Re: [OSM-talk] [Tagging] emergency=*

2010-07-31 Thread Peteris Krisjanis
2010/7/31 Ulf Lamping ulf.lamp...@googlemail.com: Am 31.07.2010 11:19, schrieb Peteris Krisjanis: If that can be solved introducing meaningful new name spaces like emergency, which could give easy way to filter emergency items, why not? What is cost of this? 1) Changing it in wiki - one day

Re: [OSM-talk] [Tagging] emergency=*

2010-07-31 Thread Cartinus
On Saturday 31 July 2010 14:00:40 Peteris Krisjanis wrote: Teaching each and every mapper out there that the tag has changed and they should no longer use the old one (not every mapper uses presets). And they never never never read wiki, or follow OSM news? Actually if this thread was not

Re: [OSM-talk] [Tagging] emergency=*

2010-07-31 Thread Ross Scanlon
Work out why it doesn't appear (5 min - your patch is actually very slightly wrong btw, can you spot your mistake?) Spotted my friday afternoon coding did you. Glad to see someones on the ball!! However the above is just for fun - lets replace my original statement with 'a lot of time' and

Re: [OSM-talk] [Tagging] emergency=*

2010-07-31 Thread John Smith
On 31 July 2010 22:47, Ross Scanlon i...@4x4falcon.com wrote: Sounds sensible to me, I'm busy tracing new nearmap imagery. With extremely useful changeset comments? :) ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org

Re: [OSM-talk] [Tagging] emergency=*

2010-07-31 Thread Liz
On Sat, 31 Jul 2010, Cartinus wrote: And nobody puts all Key: and Tag: pages in his wiki watchlist. Use one of the feeds (eg RSS) and it is easy. ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Re: [OSM-talk] [Tagging] emergency=*

2010-07-30 Thread Jacek Konieczny
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 11:42:50AM +1000, Ross Scanlon wrote: The renderer does not require any change, the only changes required are moving the amenity=police icon to be the emergency=police_station icon (which is a 30 second job) and creating an appropriate emergency parent icon (and there's

Re: [OSM-talk] [Tagging] emergency=*

2010-07-30 Thread John Smith
On 30 July 2010 16:51, Jacek Konieczny jaj...@jajcus.net wrote: Provided the program is maintained. People may use programs not maintained any more or they may be not able to upgrade or they wouldn't know they need to upgrade. Things will just stop working for them, without a notice. Is this

Re: [OSM-talk] [Tagging] emergency=*

2010-07-30 Thread Ross Scanlon
On Fri, 30 Jul 2010 17:06:14 +1000 John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote: On 30 July 2010 16:51, Jacek Konieczny jaj...@jajcus.net wrote: Provided the program is maintained. People may use programs not maintained any more or they may be not able to upgrade or they wouldn't know they

Re: [OSM-talk] [Tagging] emergency=*

2010-07-30 Thread Mike N.
I don't understand this argument. Doesn't every tag change anywhere break every editor/renderer/search/data user whether or not you think it is correct? John has just as much right to go change all the amenity= tags to something more specific as you do to keep them the same. Data consumers

Re: [OSM-talk] [Tagging] emergency=*

2010-07-30 Thread John Smith
On 30 July 2010 21:15, Mike N. nice...@att.net wrote: Every Smartphone OSM data consumer I've looked at has been unusable because of tagging interpretation. Compared to OSM, data consumers seem to be very inflexible and unaware of any but the most rigid tag schemes that haven't changed in

Re: [OSM-talk] [Tagging] emergency=*

2010-07-30 Thread Brian Quinion
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 2:42 AM, Ross Scanlon i...@4x4falcon.com wrote: Better yet - just don't change it.  This sort of change just isn't worth the pain and hundreds of developer hours that could be better spent on moving the project forward.  Yes - this sort of change might make the tag

Re: [OSM-talk] [Tagging] emergency=*

2010-07-30 Thread Mike N.
I thought most smart phone apps would mostly view map tiles, either OSM or Cloudmade? There are several apps now for the iPhone which also search POIs. Some examples: -JOSM allows tagging whether banks include an ATM - I select this when the ATM is attached to the building or inside

Re: [OSM-talk] [Tagging] emergency=*

2010-07-30 Thread Ross Scanlon
Well done. Pretty much none of the others do. I look forward to your patches :) Heres the patch for the default.style for osm2pgsql node,way emergency text nocache,polygon Wasn't worth a diff patch as it's only one line. (30 seconds) Mapnik for instance has manual rules -

Re: [OSM-talk] [Tagging] emergency=*

2010-07-30 Thread Frederik Ramm
Hi, Ross Scanlon wrote: Filter[emergency] = 'police_station'/Filter What does a police station have to do with emergencies? Are you going to tag the UN headquarters next because they run international disaster relief? Bye Frederik ___ talk

Re: [OSM-talk] [Tagging] emergency=*

2010-07-30 Thread Kevin Peat
Where the same thing is being tagged in different ways then by all means spend your energy trying to unify them as that ulitmately benefits all data consumers and reduces scope for mapper confusion. In the case of hospital or fire_station though I don't see the point of these changes. In these

Re: [OSM-talk] [Tagging] emergency=*

2010-07-30 Thread Richard Weait
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 8:40 AM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote: Just to drag things back on topic, so far most claims seem to be vague and generalised, however the original proposal about shifting police and fire into an emergency category doesn't seem to have many/any of the draw

Re: [OSM-talk] [Tagging] emergency=*

2010-07-30 Thread Emilie Laffray
On 30 July 2010 16:26, Ross Scanlon i...@4x4falcon.com wrote: Total time 6 minutes Hundreds of hours, yeah right. The program I've been talking about uses osm2pgsql and mapnik so I'm well aware of them. If your smart you could probably add the emergency data without having to totally

Re: [OSM-talk] [Tagging] emergency=*

2010-07-30 Thread Ian Dees
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 11:05 AM, Emilie Laffray emilie.laff...@gmail.comwrote: While I follow this mailing list, I am pretty sure that many people working in the OSM ecosystem is not following the change that fast. It means that every one doing an app needs to do some significant work to

Re: [OSM-talk] [Tagging] emergency=*

2010-07-30 Thread Emilie Laffray
On 30 July 2010 17:14, Ian Dees ian.d...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 11:05 AM, Emilie Laffray emilie.laff...@gmail.com wrote: While I follow this mailing list, I am pretty sure that many people working in the OSM ecosystem is not following the change that fast. It means that

Re: [OSM-talk] [Tagging] emergency=*

2010-07-30 Thread Ian Dees
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 12:30 PM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.comwrote: How is the OpenStreetMap community to distinguish these edits from vandalism, and you from a vandal? Considering I didn't make any of the changes you are accusing me of I fail to see the problem. You did...

Re: [OSM-talk] [Tagging] emergency=*

2010-07-30 Thread Frederik Ramm
John, John Smith wrote: why can't there be better tools to summarise or model changes One of my points in the other discussion what that writing proper changeset comments also means showing respect to the rest of the community. Showing respect, interacting with humans, is something that no

Re: [OSM-talk] [Tagging] emergency=*

2010-07-30 Thread John Smith
On 31 July 2010 03:43, Chris Hill o...@raggedred.net wrote: Here's an example of a change you claim you haven't made: No, I claimed to have made those, as I pointed out to you in a previous reply, what exactly was so important about these locations that no one could be bothered to spend 2

Re: [OSM-talk] [Tagging] emergency=*

2010-07-30 Thread Chris Hill
John Smith wrote: On 31 July 2010 02:05, Emilie Laffray emilie.laff...@gmail.com wrote: While I follow this mailing list, I am pretty sure that many people working in the OSM ecosystem is not following the change that fast. It means that What change, I have made a suggestion and was

Re: [OSM-talk] [Tagging] emergency=*

2010-07-30 Thread John Smith
On 31 July 2010 03:34, Ian Dees ian.d...@gmail.com wrote: It appears that you have indeed made lots of changes in the database before discussing on the list: e.g. http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/node/771625043/history Hmmm thought I fixed that by reverting that changeset... I'll fix it now

Re: [OSM-talk] [Tagging] emergency=*

2010-07-30 Thread Ian Dees
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 12:25 PM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.comwrote: On 31 July 2010 02:05, Emilie Laffray emilie.laff...@gmail.com wrote: While I follow this mailing list, I am pretty sure that many people working in the OSM ecosystem is not following the change that fast. It means

Re: [OSM-talk] [Tagging] emergency=*

2010-07-30 Thread John Smith
On 31 July 2010 02:05, Emilie Laffray emilie.laff...@gmail.com wrote: While I follow this mailing list, I am pretty sure that many people working in the OSM ecosystem is not following the change that fast. It means that What change, I have made a suggestion and was after comments, so far some

Re: [OSM-talk] [Tagging] emergency=*

2010-07-30 Thread John Smith
On 31 July 2010 02:03, Richard Weait rich...@weait.com wrote: John Smith, your method stinks. What stinks specifically, you even seem to agree in your next paragraph. You seem to believe that your preferred tag of emergency=fire_station, etc is better. Rather than adding your preferred tags

Re: [OSM-talk] [Tagging] emergency=*

2010-07-30 Thread John Smith
On 31 July 2010 03:48, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote: One of my points in the other discussion what that writing proper changeset comments also means showing respect to the rest of the community. Showing respect, interacting with humans, is something that no piece of software can do

Re: [OSM-talk] [Tagging] emergency=*

2010-07-30 Thread Richard Weait
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 1:30 PM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote: On 31 July 2010 02:03, Richard Weait rich...@weait.com wrote: John Smith, your method stinks. What stinks specifically, you even seem to agree in your next paragraph. You seem to believe that your preferred tag of

Re: [OSM-talk] [Tagging] emergency=*

2010-07-30 Thread John Smith
On 31 July 2010 04:17, Richard Weait rich...@weait.com wrote: You are contradicting yourself, John Smith. You replaced amenity=ambulance_station with your emergency=ambulance_station. This is unnecessary and inappropriate without wide community support. Since no one bothered to document this

Re: [OSM-talk] [Tagging] emergency=*

2010-07-30 Thread Liz
On Sat, 31 Jul 2010, Frederik Ramm wrote: Hi, Ross Scanlon wrote: Filter[emergency] = 'police_station'/Filter What does a police station have to do with emergencies? Are you going to tag the UN headquarters next because they run international disaster relief? Bye Frederik Well

Re: [OSM-talk] [Tagging] emergency=*

2010-07-30 Thread Ross Scanlon
On Fri, 30 Jul 2010 17:05:19 +0100 Emilie Laffray emilie.laff...@gmail.com wrote: On 30 July 2010 16:26, Ross Scanlon i...@4x4falcon.com wrote: Total time 6 minutes Hundreds of hours, yeah right. The program I've been talking about uses osm2pgsql and mapnik so I'm well aware of

Re: [OSM-talk] [Tagging] emergency=*

2010-07-30 Thread Jon Stockill
Ross Scanlon wrote: Then show why and where they don't make sense rather than carrying on about possible broken apps. Easy: amenity=hospital emergency=yes when replaced with emergency=hospital results in lost data. Jon ___ talk mailing list

Re: [OSM-talk] [Tagging] emergency=*

2010-07-29 Thread Chris Hill
John Smith wrote: On 29 July 2010 20:21, Ross Scanlon i...@4x4falcon.com wrote: 1st October 2010 Gives time to get the rendering resolved. Does anyone have a problem, or see any problems, shifting the following tags into the emergency=* tag space? amenity=police -

Re: [OSM-talk] [Tagging] emergency=*

2010-07-29 Thread John Smith
On 30 July 2010 02:59, Chris Hill o...@raggedred.net wrote: Firstly, not all hospitals are emergency hospitals, so I think that is a bad idea. Point taken... Secondly John, you seem to have unilaterally decided to make this change, and actually implemented some of it in the course of an

Re: [OSM-talk] [Tagging] emergency=*

2010-07-29 Thread Chris Hill
John Smith wrote: On 30 July 2010 02:59, Chris Hill o...@raggedred.net wrote: Firstly, not all hospitals are emergency hospitals, so I think that is a bad idea. Point taken... Secondly John, you seem to have unilaterally decided to make this change, and actually implemented some

Re: [OSM-talk] [Tagging] emergency=*

2010-07-29 Thread John Smith
On 30 July 2010 03:35, Chris Hill o...@raggedred.net wrote: You have already changed amenity=ambulance_station to emergency=ambulance_station, which was not listed above, so you have already started to make these worldwide changes. It wasn't documented at all on the wiki, at all, so if it was

Re: [OSM-talk] [Tagging] emergency=*

2010-07-29 Thread Brian Quinion
Discussing this for a day on the Tagging list is not enough for you to make this change. How much time should it take? I didn't really set a dead line but was trying to get comments on the idea... A change that breaks every editor / renderer / search data user ? 6 months minimum before you

Re: [OSM-talk] [Tagging] emergency=*

2010-07-29 Thread Ian Dees
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 1:00 PM, Brian Quinion openstreet...@brian.quinion.co.uk wrote: Discussing this for a day on the Tagging list is not enough for you to make this change. How much time should it take? I didn't really set a dead line but was trying to get comments on the idea...

Re: [OSM-talk] [Tagging] emergency=*

2010-07-29 Thread John Smith
On 30 July 2010 04:09, Ian Dees ian.d...@gmail.com wrote: I don't understand this argument. Doesn't every tag change anywhere break every editor/renderer/search/data user whether or not you think it is correct? It's slightly amusing how it comes up every now and then about what to do about

Re: [OSM-talk] [Tagging] emergency=*

2010-07-29 Thread Brian Quinion
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 7:09 PM, Ian Dees ian.d...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 1:00 PM, Brian Quinion openstreet...@brian.quinion.co.uk wrote: Discussing this for a day on the Tagging list is not enough for you to make this change. How much time should it take? I didn't

Re: [OSM-talk] [Tagging] emergency=*

2010-07-29 Thread Toby Murray
If there IS a change for medical stuff, I would personally rather see the medical=* proposal be used. http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Medical Hospitals could be medical=hospital and emergency=yes/no to take care of the is this an emergency hospital concern. Then I guess a

Re: [OSM-talk] [Tagging] emergency=*

2010-07-29 Thread John Smith
On 30 July 2010 04:54, Toby Murray toby.mur...@gmail.com wrote: If there IS a change for medical stuff, I would personally rather see the medical=* proposal be used. At this stage it'd be nice to sort out the emergency=* issue before trying to tackle anything else :) I agree with Chris that it

Re: [OSM-talk] [Tagging] emergency=*

2010-07-29 Thread Ross Scanlon
Better yet - just don't change it. This sort of change just isn't worth the pain and hundreds of developer hours that could be better spent on moving the project forward. Yes - this sort of change might make the tag heirachy prettier - but not enough to justify the work. Garbage. It's not