On 2016-04-12 16:29, Martijn van Exel wrote:
> I am not so concerned with rendering - that's not what we map for.
I think it would sound better if you said that rendering is one of the
many things we map for. OSM is not WOM (write-only memory).
//colin
Well, while the use of the data on the 'airport related web sites' may or
may not be valid to use, going around deleting private ones seems somewhat
counter-intuitive - why not simply mark them as private, if that
knowledge/data is open? If they do get rendered, I'm sure there are
precedents for
Hi all,
Thanks for the feedback. I understand that the existence of an small airfield
can be hard to verify from imagery - but I am also wondering what the value of
this unverified and stale data is to OSM. If they were mapper surveyed nodes to
begin with I would perhaps feel the need to be
3 matches
Mail list logo
