On 6 March 2017 5:41:01 PM GMT+01:00, Andy Townsend wrote:
>On 06/03/2017 07:32, Werner Poppele wrote:
>
> I'd also suggest that
>whatever it is in JOSM that's recommending this be changed so as not
>to. A couple of times in the past I've suggested that JOSM's rules be
> On 07 Mar 2017, at 09:44, molto...@gmail.com wrote:
> FWIW I've alway ignored JOSM's "Bing" -> "bing" warning and would be glad to
> see it removed, or reversed and downgraded to notice.
>
> While we do have a "standard values should be lowercase" best-practice in
> OSM, I don't think this
On 6 March 2017 5:41:01 PM GMT+01:00, Andy Townsend wrote:
>1) If JOSM is really recommending that you change "source=Bing" to
>"source=bing" or vice versa then I'd suggest that you ignore it. With
>both "Bing" and "bing" it's pretty obvious what the source is and not
On 06/03/2017 07:32, Werner Poppele wrote:
before uploading data to OSM, JOSM showed an error / warning message
about the "suspect" writing of "Bing". That was the reason for
changing "Bing" to "bing".
Hi Werner,
I'm guessing that the context of this message is changeset discussion
Good morning,
before uploading data to OSM, JOSM showed an error / warning message
about the "suspect" writing of "Bing". That was the reason for changing
"Bing" to "bing".
WernerP
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
5 matches
Mail list logo