[OSM-talk] Future Group

2014-11-17 Thread Andy Mabbett
After SotM in Birmingham, I was invited to join the OSM Future Group:

   http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Future
   (page includes a list of members, and a timetable.)

and agreed to do so (Indeed, I paid a subscription solely in order to
be eligible to do so).

That group has not met nor communicated since then.

Should we presume the group is defunct, and mark the age accordingly?

-- 
Andy Mabbett
@pigsonthewing
http://pigsonthewing.org.uk

___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk


Re: [OSM-talk] Future Group

2014-11-17 Thread marekskleciak
Dear Andy,

I join to the future working group. 
I´m sad about this stagnation.
I invite you to the next telco after 27.nov.2014

Skype iD: marekOSMPolska 

Best,
Marek



Dnia 17 listopada 2014 20:11 Andy Mabbett a...@pigsonthewing.org.uk 
napisał(a):

 After SotM in Birmingham, I was invited to join the OSM Future Group: 
 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Future(page includes a list of 
 members, and a timetable.)  and agreed to do so (Indeed, I paid a 
 subscription solely in order to be eligible to do so).  That group has not 
 met nor communicated since then.  Should we presume the group is defunct, 
 and mark the age accordingly?  --  Andy Mabbett @pigsonthewing 
 http://pigsonthewing.org.uk  
 ___ talk mailing list 
 talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk 

___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk


Re: [OSM-talk] Future Group

2014-11-17 Thread Johan C
You're right on that Andy, as it was I that asked you to join the FG, I
very much liked the contact with other FG members, the creation of the
SWOT, the interview and the SOTM workshop on dreams for 2020:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Future/Dreams#Attendants_of_workshop_.27Road_map_to_the_future.27.2C_SOTM_Birmingham.2C_7_September_2013

There were enough people involved in the FG. Main challenge was keeping the
fire burning. So it's good to see new enthousiasm coming in. I can't recall
if I invited you on the Hangout at March 2nd this year. If not: excuses for
that. I'm however sure I included you in the invitation mail which I send a
few weeks before that Hangout, see below. Result of that meeting (no notes
available) was that the participants wanted to go on (I also said yes
although I was a bit reluctant) and that Dermot would take care of some
procedures to turn FG into the FWG. Since then -till now- it has become
very silent.

Invitation mail of February 2014 below:



Hi everyone

on Sunday 2 March 2014 21:00 Amsterdam time (20:00 London, 12:00 Seattle)
I'll invite you to a Hangout on the future of the future group.

There has been inactivity lately within the Future Group. Therefore I see
the following options for the Future Group:
1. quit because of the inactivity
2. go on as as FG or as a FWG, but only with the people who show interest
in proceeding

If we go on, maybe we should be focussing more on practical issues such as
our major weaknesses. Like the one I've been involved in for the last four
months: address and building imports.

One other practical thing I'm thinking about, if we go on, is increasing
cooperation between OSM and professional parties like Telenav.

A third practical one is thinking about the way (smartphone?) editors could
become friendly enough to newcomers, especially when the data density in
OSM rises (for example beacuse of imports or because of micromapping).

See you on the 2nd of March!

Cheers, Johan






2014-11-17 20:49 GMT+01:00 marekskleciak mareksklec...@o2.pl:

 Dear Andy,

 I join to the future working group.
 I´m sad about this stagnation.
 I invite you to the next telco after 27.nov.2014

 Skype iD: marekOSMPolska

 Best,
 Marek



 Dnia 17 listopada 2014 20:11 Andy Mabbett a...@pigsonthewing.org.uk
 napisał(a):

  After SotM in Birmingham, I was invited to join the OSM Future Group:
 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Future(page includes a list
 of members, and a timetable.)  and agreed to do so (Indeed, I paid a
 subscription solely in order to be eligible to do so).  That group has
 not met nor communicated since then.  Should we presume the group is
 defunct, and mark the age accordingly?  --  Andy Mabbett
 @pigsonthewing http://pigsonthewing.org.uk 
 ___ talk mailing list
 talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

 ___
 talk mailing list
 talk@openstreetmap.org
 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk