Re: [OSM-talk] Google Maps - OSM comparison

2008-12-13 Thread OJ W
There seems to be a problem with Douglas (Isle of Man) - in that comparison site it's showing Douglas in South Africa: http://lamp2.fhstp.ac.at/~lbz/beispiele/ws2008/capitals/index.php?start=61 the Isle of Man one looks much better in OSM than the african one:

Re: [OSM-talk] Google Maps - OSM comparison

2008-12-13 Thread OJ W
Using this place as the capital of UK is probably misleading too: https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/East_London,_Eastern_Cape On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 5:27 PM, OJ W ojwli...@googlemail.com wrote: There seems to be a problem with Douglas (Isle of Man) - in that comparison site

Re: [OSM-talk] Google Maps - OSM comparison

2008-12-05 Thread Edward Johnson
At CloudMade we have been doing a lot of research and comparison into the quality and completeness of the map but more focussing on Europe and the USA. So it is very interesting to see this and see just how far ahead we seem to be in less developed areas. I would be very interested in looking

Re: [OSM-talk] Google Maps - OSM comparison

2008-12-03 Thread Gervase Markham
David Earl wrote: There's have to be some indication that's what was wanted IMO. I'm pretty sure Google Maps does this by default. Also, though I'm sure it is possible, and I could use optimizations of various kinds, ordering by great circle distance (which you'd need to do for this) is

Re: [OSM-talk] Google Maps - OSM comparison

2008-11-30 Thread Gervase Markham
David Earl wrote: However, if we start applying similar techniques to state captials or other hierarchies, a search inferred from a loose syntax will not be enough and I need to provide a more formal way for mechanical clients to constrain their searches. As it stands city is ambiguous - it

Re: [OSM-talk] Google Maps - OSM comparison

2008-11-30 Thread David Earl
On 30/11/2008 13:09, Gervase Markham wrote: David Earl wrote: However, if we start applying similar techniques to state captials or other hierarchies, a search inferred from a loose syntax will not be enough and I need to provide a more formal way for mechanical clients to constrain their

Re: [OSM-talk] Google Maps - OSM comparison

2008-11-28 Thread Dave Stubbs
2008/11/28 Bernhard Zwischenbrugger [EMAIL PROTECTED]: hi and New Delhi is not shown at all There were some bugs with spaces, commas,... (urlencode) They are fixed now. There are still some problems. The capitals come from this list

Re: [OSM-talk] Google Maps - OSM comparison

2008-11-28 Thread David Earl
On 28/11/2008 12:02, Bernhard Zwischenbrugger wrote: hi and New Delhi is not shown at all There were some bugs with spaces, commas,... (urlencode) They are fixed now. There are still some problems. The capitals come from this list

Re: [OSM-talk] Google Maps - OSM comparison

2008-11-28 Thread Lars Kruse
Hi, I made a comparison Google Maps - OSM for all capitals. http://lamp2.fhstp.ac.at/~lbz/beispiele/ws2008/capitals/index.php I am amazed. That's a great thing for getting a feeling for the worldwide progress of OSM ... Some cities like Havanna have wrong coordinates. No idea why the

Re: [OSM-talk] Google Maps - OSM comparison

2008-11-28 Thread Adam Schreiber
On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 7:25 AM, David Earl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: London - missing (found an other London) Washington, D.C. - not found The comma is a bit of syntax for namefinder. Also state abbreviations (OK, DC's it's not a state exactly, but it has the same role here) are not stored

Re: [OSM-talk] Google Maps - OSM comparison

2008-11-28 Thread Bernhard Zwischenbrugger
hi and New Delhi is not shown at all There were some bugs with spaces, commas,... (urlencode) They are fixed now. There are still some problems. The capitals come from this list http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_national_capitals The name of the city is given to namefinder. The first

Re: [OSM-talk] Google Maps - OSM comparison

2008-11-28 Thread Kenneth Gonsalves
On Friday 28 November 2008 03:48:22 pm Hakan Tandogan wrote: It shows how OSM is especially good in areas that are commercially not really interesting. uniformly good everywhere there are mappers - so only in the 'important' areas we need to catch up - rest of the world we are way ahead

Re: [OSM-talk] Google Maps - OSM comparison

2008-11-28 Thread Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2008/11/28 Bernhard Zwischenbrugger [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hi all I made a comparison Google Maps - OSM for all capitals. http://lamp2.fhstp.ac.at/~lbz/beispiele/ws2008/capitals/index.php Note that this does not include Google Mapmaker so Google has better data for some of these lying around.

Re: [OSM-talk] Google Maps - OSM comparison

2008-11-28 Thread Bernhard Zwischenbrugger
Hi When I did this capital comparison I searched for o A relation that contains all capitals (didn't find) o Then I wanted to use osmxapi - but that was down o Then I tried to search for microformats for geolocations in Wikipedia but there are only a few cities with microformats o namefinder

Re: [OSM-talk] Google Maps - OSM comparison

2008-11-28 Thread Vikas Yadav
Hi all, Im surveying Gurgaon and New Delhi. I'd like to add that Google Maps is drawing based on satellite images of the roads. Here, we are having massive road shiftings, fly over consturctions and new roads or deletions. The latest google earth images are still more than a year old. While, in

Re: [OSM-talk] Google Maps - OSM comparison

2008-11-28 Thread ビカス ヤダワ (v ikas yadav)
Hi all, Im surveying Gurgaon and New Delhi. I'd like to add that Google Maps is drawing based on satellite images of the roads. Here, we are having massive road shiftings, fly over consturctions and new roads or deletions. The latest google earth images are still more than a year old. While, in