On Sun, Sep 27, 2009 at 1:38 AM, Dave F. dave...@madasafish.com wrote:
I'm repeatedly told don't tag for the renderers
OK, let me even it out a bit and give you some guidance:
Tagging for the renderer is OK
Tagging for the renderer is OK
Tagging for the renderer is OK
Tagging for the renderer
Hi,
I suppose I'm the culprit for the todo=continue and todo=junction
tags, since I've used them internally for some time and then added them
to GroundTruth hiking rules once I developed GroundTruth.
These tags are not primarily rendering-oriented, they are just pointers
(for me and anyone
ed...@billiau.net wrote:
You see, this is where I get /really /confused
I see no reference to 'todo' or 'continue' in the general OSM wiki.
In the Groundtruth wiki page they're highlighted red, saying there there
no reference page.
I'm repeatedly told don't tag for the renderers
Yet it
2009/9/28 Dave F. dave...@madasafish.com:
The database on its own is useless. It needs to be represented in some
manner such as a visual map. To tag randomly ie 'tag whatever you want
let the renderers sort it out' seems illogical counter productive.
It's more of a case of converting the
John Smith wrote:
2009/9/28 Dave F. dave...@madasafish.com:
The database on its own is useless. It needs to be represented in some
manner such as a visual map. To tag randomly ie 'tag whatever you want
let the renderers sort it out' seems illogical counter productive.
It's more
2009/9/28 Dave F. dave...@madasafish.com:
I'm not saying we should bend over backwards in our tagging to ensure it
will immediately render in all the different rendering flavours, but to
tag without /any/ consideration for multitude of uses OSM could be used
for is, I think, lazy, selfish
John Smith wrote:
2009/9/28 Dave F. dave...@madasafish.com:
I'm not saying we should bend over backwards in our tagging to ensure it
will immediately render in all the different rendering flavours, but to
tag without /any/ consideration for multitude of uses OSM could be used
for is, I
2009/9/26 David Paleino d.pale...@gmail.com:
k...@vielevisels wrote:
Hi,
many people tag ways, which are incomplete and show just the beginning,
with the note (or FIXME) = stub. In the wiki, the tag noexit=no is
intended for this. I think it would be helpful have one way to tag this
and to
k...@vielevisels wrote:
Hi,
many people tag ways, which are incomplete and show just the beginning,
with the note (or FIXME) = stub. In the wiki, the tag noexit=no is
intended for this. I think it would be helpful have one way to tag this
and to render both (dead-ends and incomplete ways),
k...@vielevisels wrote:
Hi,
many people tag ways, which are incomplete and show just the
beginning, with the note (or FIXME) = stub. In the wiki, the tag
noexit=no is intended for this. I think it would be helpful have one
way to tag this and to render both (dead-ends and incomplete ways), to
Hi,
many people tag ways, which are incomplete and show just the beginning, with
the note (or FIXME) = stub. In the wiki, the tag noexit=no is intended for this.
I think it would be helpful have one way to tag this and to render both
(dead-ends and incomplete ways), to show where work has to be
k...@vielevisels wrote:
Hi,
many people tag ways, which are incomplete and show just the
beginning, with the note (or FIXME) = stub. In the wiki, the tag
noexit=no is intended for this.
I think it would be helpful have one way to tag this and to render
both (dead-ends and incomplete
On 26/09/2009 15:00, k...@vielevisels wrote:
Hi,
many people tag ways, which are incomplete and show just the beginning,
with the note (or FIXME) = stub. In the wiki, the tag noexit=no is
intended for this.
I think it would be helpful have one way to tag this and to render both
(dead-ends
David Earl wrote:
On 26/09/2009 15:00, k...@vielevisels wrote:
Hi,
many people tag ways, which are incomplete and show just the beginning,
with the note (or FIXME) = stub. In the wiki, the tag noexit=no is
intended for this.
I think it would be helpful have one way to tag this and to
On 26/09/2009 18:20, Dave F. wrote:
David Earl wrote:
On 26/09/2009 15:00, k...@vielevisels wrote:
Hi,
many people tag ways, which are incomplete and show just the
beginning, with the note (or FIXME) = stub. In the wiki, the tag
noexit=no is intended for this.
I think it would be
But as I said, I'd much rather have a specific, rendered, more to do
here tag for stubs that is removed when the way is extended.
not a good idea for the normal map. have you ever seen any other commercial
map with hey look this map is incomplete BS info?
sure it makes sense to get this info
On 26/09/2009 19:09, Apollinaris Schoell wrote:
But as I said, I'd much rather have a specific, rendered, more to do
here tag for stubs that is removed when the way is extended.
not a good idea for the normal map. have you ever seen any other
commercial map with hey look this map is
On Saturday 26 September 2009 20:09:34 Apollinaris Schoell wrote:
There are GroundTruth styles
(http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/GroundTruth_Hiking_Map#IconTodoJunction)
with support for tags todo=continue and todo=junction
In this sample
On Sat, Sep 26, 2009 at 11:15 AM, David Earl da...@frankieandshadow.comwrote:
On 26/09/2009 19:09, Apollinaris Schoell wrote:
But as I said, I'd much rather have a specific, rendered, more to do
here tag for stubs that is removed when the way is extended.
not a good idea for the normal
You see, this is where I get /really /confused
I see no reference to 'todo' or 'continue' in the general OSM wiki.
In the Groundtruth wiki page they're highlighted red, saying there there
no reference page.
I'm repeatedly told don't tag for the renderers
Yet it appears in this case the
On Sat, Sep 26, 2009 at 5:38 PM, Dave F. dave...@madasafish.com wrote:
You see, this is where I get /really /confused
I see no reference to 'todo' or 'continue' in the general OSM wiki.
In the Groundtruth wiki page they're highlighted red, saying there there
no reference page.
If you think
21 matches
Mail list logo
