All the OSM 'leaderboard' sites I've seen are based on quantity.
OSM needs more quality mappers.
There's a page which tabled the number of changesets created by
individual contributors per day/week/month. I believe this led to a few
anal retentives quickly creating one changeset for every
Out of topic content. There is discussions about being more welcoming on this
list, along with being open to other communications channels. Even with that in
mind, I must admit I hadn't logged in or subscribed to slack to check on the
discussion while the topic may be of interest.
By any means,
+1
I'm sorry if I sound a little paranoid, but somone with an email address
of little.banana.peel and calling him TheAdventurer64 and asking people
to read something for which they have to log in to with a google account
does not give the feel for a solid foundation for a discussion.
Would you mind describing the proposed system here, in a concise form?
On Sat, Oct 17, 2020 at 7:36 PM TheAdventurer64 <
little.banana.p...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> A user and I were talking about implementing a system for better mapping,
> as described here:
>
Hello everyone,
A user and I were talking about implementing a system for better mapping,
as described here:
https://osmus.slack.com/archives/C029HV951/p1602968516431900
This addition would have many benefits, including:
* More mapping. We have tons of new mappers each day, as well as a great
5 matches
Mail list logo
