Re: [OSM-talk] Is OSM Anti-Fascist? (was: Cease use of OpenStreetMap/Antifa logo)

2020-02-16 Thread dcapillae
Frederik Ramm wrote
> I agree that OSM should remain un-political where possible, just so that
> political squabbles do not interfere with mapping.

That's right. I think we'd do well to stop this discussion. There's no point
in talking in political terms about what we do. 

I already have some bad experience with mappers who make such
interpretations and use the map to reflect their desires or political
ideologies. Those of us who don't participate in that diabolical game always
lose out, because of these people and those who keep silent by allowing them
to act like this. This is what happens when we mix politics with "what we
do" here. 

The map would be a better place without all of them (and this forum will be
a nicer place to visit if we don't talk politics).

Greetings from Spain.

Regards,
Daniel



--
Sent from: http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/General-Discussion-f5171242.html

___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk


Re: [OSM-talk] Is OSM Anti-Fascist? (was: Cease use of OpenStreetMap/Antifa logo)

2020-02-14 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
Am Do., 13. Feb. 2020 um 14:28 Uhr schrieb Frederik Ramm <
frede...@remote.org>:

> where governments propose or make laws that would
> make it harder for us to map, I think we should oppose that in a
> structured way, as an organisation - provided we have the time and
> energy for that.




+1, I agree, but ultimately this means we would act politically (as an
organization).

Cheers
Martin
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk


Re: [OSM-talk] Is OSM Anti-Fascist? (was: Cease use of OpenStreetMap/Antifa logo)

2020-02-13 Thread Frederik Ramm
Hi,

I agree that OSM should remain un-political where possible, just so that
political squabbles do not interfere with mapping.

At one "Local Chapters Congress" at one of the recent SotM conferences,
I remember someone from an African country saying that they already
faced difficulties setting up an OSM organisation in that country
because other people believed OSM was something subversive that would
threaten established powers and values.

And what we do is of course subversive when viewed from an authoritarian
perspective (what, everyone to make their own maps that are not
government-sanctioned, how dare you). I agree with Florian that OSM is
deeply anti-Fascist in what it does, but that is as far as it goes: The
things we do go against authoritarianism, against Fascism - we as a
group or we as and organisation do not, and we do not endorse political
organisations, be they pro or anti Fascist. Our official position should
be that we are apolitical, even if our activities might not be!

On the other hand, where governments propose or make laws that would
make it harder for us to map, I think we should oppose that in a
structured way, as an organisation - provided we have the time and
energy for that.

Bye
Frederik

-- 
Frederik Ramm  ##  eMail frede...@remote.org  ##  N49°00'09" E008°23'33"



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk