Re: [OSM-talk] Licence compatibility (was Adding wikidata tags to the remaining objects with only wikipedia tag)

2017-10-03 Thread Yuri Astrakhan
Thanks Richard. Understood about coordinates. I suspect that most of the Wikidata+OSM value is not related to Wikipedia's geolocations, but rather multilingual names, object classifications, links to multiple Wikipedia languages, and an ability to query connected graph data. To my knowledge,

Re: [OSM-talk] Licence compatibility (was Adding wikidata tags to the remaining objects with only wikipedia tag)

2017-10-03 Thread Richard Fairhurst
Yuri Astrakhan wrote: > Also, what about the location where data is combined? E.g. if wikidata > is in public domain, and US courts agree with that statement, anyone > in the US can combine it with OSM data? What about UK? In any > case, i suspect nothing we decide has any merit until the

Re: [OSM-talk] Licence compatibility (was Adding wikidata tags to the remaining objects with only wikipedia tag)

2017-10-02 Thread Yuri Astrakhan
Interesting question, especially considering that all other external data sources have much more restrictive license - e.g. mapilary id or any url/website tag (which is technically also an ID into another data source)... Also, what about the location where data is combined? E.g. if wikidata is in

[OSM-talk] Licence compatibility (was Adding wikidata tags to the remaining objects with only wikipedia tag)

2017-10-02 Thread Andy Townsend
On 02/10/2017 02:56, Paul Norman wrote: On 10/1/2017 5:39 PM, Yuri Astrakhan wrote: Lastly, if the coordinates are different, you may not copy it from OSM to Wikidata because of the difference in the license. Just for clarity and anyone reading the archives later, copying from Wikidata to