> In the absence of other proposals, even splitting it among the other two
> would be a much better use, in my opinion.
Chrm. iD gets the pile of money and the MAIN OpenStreetMap editor -
JOSM - gets NOTHING?
Or does this show that iD is so broken/unwanted that nobody wants to
work on it
I agree.
Skyler Hawthorne skrev: (2 augusti 2020 19:30:09 CEST)
>In the absence of other proposals, even splitting it among the other
>two would be a much better use, in my opinion.
>
>--
>Skyler
>
>
>On Sun, Aug 2, 2020, at 13:27, Rory McCann wrote:
>> On 02.08.20 01:03, Skyler Hawthorne wrote:
In the absence of other proposals, even splitting it among the other two would
be a much better use, in my opinion.
--
Skyler
On Sun, Aug 2, 2020, at 13:27, Rory McCann wrote:
> On 02.08.20 01:03, Skyler Hawthorne wrote:
> > Sorry if this sounds harsh, but I think using any funds at all to
>
On 02.08.20 01:03, Skyler Hawthorne wrote:
Sorry if this sounds harsh, but I think using any funds at all to
continue support for a tool that 1% of editors use would be wasteful.
Flash is, for all intents and purposes, a dead technology. This money is
better spent on other uses.
What would
4 matches
Mail list logo
