I think CloudMade's Mapzen flash editor is intending to do just this,
and other specific purpose mapping scenarios:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mapzen
On 3 Nov 2009, at 00:10, Ian Dees wrote:
Has anyone attempted to write a turn restriction editor? I suppose
it would be best suited
Ian Dees wrote:
Has anyone attempted to write a turn restriction editor? I suppose it
would be best suited as a JOSM plugin, but I suppose it would also work
as a web app or something via OAuth.
It would be nice to show a GUI where intersecting ways are shown up
close with an editor to
Has anyone attempted to write a turn restriction editor? I suppose it would
be best suited as a JOSM plugin, but I suppose it would also work as a web
app or something via OAuth.
It would be nice to show a GUI where intersecting ways are shown up close
with an editor to describe the lanes, where
Hi,
I have one question for turn restrictions gurus :)
Have you used http://keepright.ipax.at site for error checking? I got
a message that turn restriction has no type tag.
I have used wiki for getting to know how to use turn restrictions, and
there the examples given on the page:
Valent Turkovic wrote:
I have used wiki for getting to know how to use turn restrictions, and
there the examples given on the page:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:restriction
type tag is not used.
The type tag is listed in the tags section on that page.
The examples were added
On Tue, 26 May 2009 08:44:54 +0300, Maarten Deen md...@xs4all.nl wrote:
I've searched the wiki and I have used the tag myself, but there seems
to be
no documentation for restriction= ?
How do you tag a restriction on a crossing between a major and a minor
road
where the major road is
Cartinus wrote:
On Tuesday 26 May 2009 07:44:54 Maarten Deen wrote:
I've searched the wiki and I have used the tag myself, but there seems to
be no documentation for restriction= ?
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:restriction
Thanks, I knew it was somewhere, but the wiki search
Maarten Deen wrote:
I've searched the wiki and I have used the tag myself, but there seems to be
no documentation for restriction= ?
This is, in fact, documented.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:restriction
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
2009/5/26 Maarten Deen md...@xs4all.nl:
Cartinus wrote:
On Tuesday 26 May 2009 07:44:54 Maarten Deen wrote:
I've searched the wiki and I have used the tag myself, but there seems to
be no documentation for restriction= ?
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:restriction
Thanks, I
What is your problem with having way sections between each intersection
instead of one long way?
The AND data in the Netherlands has ways that go only from intersection
to intersection, we already split the ways at bridges, tunnels, maxspeed
changes, name changes etc. Apparently the method of
What is your problem with having way sections between each
intersection
instead of one long way?
I don't have a problem with splitting ways, as that is what I've
always done to add the relevant tags to the relevant section. But I
can understand that there is a bit of an issue with doing such a
On Fri, 24 Apr 2009 10:01:20 +0100, Ed Loach e...@loach.me.uk wrote:
What is your problem with having way sections between each
intersection
instead of one long way?
I don't have a problem with splitting ways, as that is what I've
always done to add the relevant tags to the relevant
On Fri, 24 Apr 2009 12:01:20 +0300, Ed Loach e...@loach.me.uk wrote:
What is your problem with having way sections between each
intersection
instead of one long way?
I don't have a problem with splitting ways, as that is what I've
always done to add the relevant tags to the relevant
Ed Loach wrote:
I don't know how
routing engines work out when one way at a junction has priority
over another (or whether they even bother - I guess the best
available at present is to compare names and/or refs).
Why do we need to know which way has priority? Yes it is nice to know
some
On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 10:13 AM, kaerast kaer...@qvox.org wrote:
Why do we need to know which way has priority? Yes it is nice to know
some times, but no other maps show this and it just isn't necessary. It
tends to be slower roads which you need to give way on, and these are
already given
I don't see a clear explanation as to why there is ambiguity if you
don't do turn restrictions at the end of ways on the wiki. There is
some stuff in the talk page
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Relation:restriction
Anyone care to provide an explanation?
The reason I ask is
On Thu, 23 Apr 2009 21:34:05 +0300, SteveC st...@asklater.com wrote:
I don't see a clear explanation as to why there is ambiguity if you
don't do turn restrictions at the end of ways on the wiki. There is
some stuff in the talk page
On 23 Apr 2009, at 12:17, Teemu Koskinen wrote:
On Thu, 23 Apr 2009 21:34:05 +0300, SteveC st...@asklater.com wrote:
I don't see a clear explanation as to why there is ambiguity if you
don't do turn restrictions at the end of ways on the wiki. There is
some stuff in the talk page
On Thu, 23 Apr 2009 22:25:36 +0300, SteveC st...@asklater.com wrote:
On 23 Apr 2009, at 12:17, Teemu Koskinen wrote:
On Thu, 23 Apr 2009 21:34:05 +0300, SteveC st...@asklater.com wrote:
I don't see a clear explanation as to why there is ambiguity if you
don't do turn restrictions at the
SteveC wrote:
On 23 Apr 2009, at 12:17, Teemu Koskinen wrote:
If both from and to ways continue after the via point and neither is
one-way, there's two possible ways to interpret it: the restriction
could apply when coming from either of the ends of the from-way.
This of course doesn't
On 23 Apr 2009, at 12:32, Teemu Koskinen wrote:
On Thu, 23 Apr 2009 22:25:36 +0300, SteveC st...@asklater.com wrote:
On 23 Apr 2009, at 12:17, Teemu Koskinen wrote:
On Thu, 23 Apr 2009 21:34:05 +0300, SteveC st...@asklater.com
wrote:
I don't see a clear explanation as to why there is
On 23 Apr 2009, at 12:34, Tobias Knerr wrote:
SteveC wrote:
On 23 Apr 2009, at 12:17, Teemu Koskinen wrote:
If both from and to ways continue after the via point and neither is
one-way, there's two possible ways to interpret it: the restriction
could apply when coming from either of the
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 14:45, David Lynch djly...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 14:25, SteveC st...@asklater.com wrote:
If both from and to ways continue after the via point and neither is
one-way, there's two possible ways to interpret it: the restriction
could apply when
2009/4/23 SteveC st...@asklater.com:
On 23 Apr 2009, at 12:32, Teemu Koskinen wrote:
On Thu, 23 Apr 2009 22:25:36 +0300, SteveC st...@asklater.com wrote:
On 23 Apr 2009, at 12:17, Teemu Koskinen wrote:
On Thu, 23 Apr 2009 21:34:05 +0300, SteveC st...@asklater.com
wrote:
I don't see a
SteveC schrieb:
Ok so in that case... why don't we make best practice to split your way
A in to two directions, rather than hundreds of little ways?
You mean something like that
^A1 |A2
| |
| |
| | B
---*-*--
| |
| |
| v
with
If one were to refer to nodes on the two ways instead of the way itself,
it would remove the ambiguity wouldn't it? Albeit more complicated for
the consumer to work out, in that it would have to decide which way the
two nodes were on.
|A
*a
|
c| b
On Thu, 23 Apr 2009 21:56:09 +0200, andrzej zaborowski balr...@gmail.com
wrote:
2009/4/23 SteveC st...@asklater.com:
On 23 Apr 2009, at 12:32, Teemu Koskinen wrote:
On Thu, 23 Apr 2009 22:25:36 +0300, SteveC st...@asklater.com wrote:
On 23 Apr 2009, at 12:17, Teemu Koskinen wrote:
On
2009/4/23 Aun Johnsen (via Webmail) skipp...@gimnechiske.org:
On Thu, 23 Apr 2009 21:56:09 +0200, andrzej zaborowski balr...@gmail.com
wrote:
Or something like this is common:
B C
\ |
\ |
\|
|
|
A
where the straight line is considered a turn even though it's
David Earl schrieb:
If one were to refer to nodes on the two ways instead of the way itself,
it would remove the ambiguity wouldn't it?
There was a proposal that suggested exactly that, xrestriction:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php?title=Relation:xrestriction
Hasn't been used a lot.
On 23 Apr 2009, at 22:56, andrzej zaborowski wrote:
2009/4/23 SteveC st...@asklater.com:
On 23 Apr 2009, at 12:32, Teemu Koskinen wrote:
On Thu, 23 Apr 2009 22:25:36 +0300, SteveC st...@asklater.com
wrote:
On 23 Apr 2009, at 12:17, Teemu Koskinen wrote:
On Thu, 23 Apr 2009 21:34:05
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 9:16 PM, David Earl da...@frankieandshadow.com wrote:
If one were to refer to nodes on the two ways instead of the way itself,
it would remove the ambiguity wouldn't it? Albeit more complicated for
the consumer to work out, in that it would have to decide which way the
What is the opposite of a turn restriction? I can't find it and no one
answers on IRC.
Turning left is forbidden everywhere in my country on two way roads when
there is no specific traffic light for it, and I assume it's the same in many
other countries. Without a turning left allowed
Matias D'Ambrosio wrote:
Sent: 22 October 2008 8:21 PM
To: talk@openstreetmap.org
Subject: [OSM-talk] Turn restrictions vs allowances?
What is the opposite of a turn restriction? I can't find it and no one
answers on IRC.
Turning left is forbidden everywhere in my country on two way roads when
On Wednesday 22 October 2008 18:06:10 you wrote:
Matias D'Ambrosio wrote:
Sent: 22 October 2008 8:21 PM
To: talk@openstreetmap.org
Subject: [OSM-talk] Turn restrictions vs allowances?
What is the opposite of a turn restriction? I can't find it and no one
answers on IRC.
Turning left
) [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Matias D'Ambrosio wrote:
Sent: 22 October 2008 8:21 PM
To: talk@openstreetmap.org
Subject: [OSM-talk] Turn restrictions vs allowances?
What is the opposite of a turn restriction? I can't find it and no one
answers on IRC.
Turning left is forbidden everywhere in my country
I've create an proposal for turn restrictions. It's at
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Relation:xrestriction
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk
On Sun, Jun 29, 2008 at 12:55 PM, Nic Roets [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've create an proposal for turn restrictions. It's at
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Relation:xrestriction
I do not see how
Relation:restriction does not allow mappers to unambiguously
specify any of the 16
Ways NS and EW cross at X. Tell me how to encode all these combinations :
1. I travel North in NS and turn left at X
2. I travel North in NS and turn right at X
3. I travel North in NS straight through X
4. I travel North in NS and make a U-turn at X
Now replace 'North' with 'South' and you have 8
Hi,
I've create an proposal for turn restrictions. It's at
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Relation:xrestriction
I see no problem in splitting a way at an intersection where it
is part of a turn restriction, thus nicely solving all ambiguity.
Bye
Frederik
--
Frederik Ramm ##
I'm not saying you're wrong, but I hope you at least see a few small problems :
1. Mappers may not think about coming from the other side and forget
to split. (unless the validator flags it).
2. The more split ways we have, the more difficult it is to keep all
the tags up to date (esp outside
40 matches
Mail list logo
