Re: [OSM-talk] Viewing pre-redaction OSM tiles?

2016-07-15 Thread Matthijs Melissen
On 14 July 2016 at 21:16, Pierre Béland wrote: > Michal, you might have seen my OSMCompare slider map where I use the FOSM > layer for comparison. > > http://pierzen.dev.openstreetmap.org/hot/leaflet/OSM-Compare-before-after.html#10/27.9083/85.5286 Nice work, inspired on this

Re: [OSM-talk] Viewing pre-redaction OSM tiles?

2016-07-15 Thread moltonel 3x Combo
On 15/07/2016, Rory McCann wrote: > On 14/07/16 20:49, Michał Brzozowski wrote: >> I would swear I saw a page doing exactly that (with a comparison slider). >> The reason is I suspect that some website uses old cc-by-sa OSM data >> (due to its nature, with their own updates)

Re: [OSM-talk] Viewing pre-redaction OSM tiles?

2016-07-15 Thread Rory McCann
On 14/07/16 20:49, Michał Brzozowski wrote: > I would swear I saw a page doing exactly that (with a comparison slider). > The reason is I suspect that some website uses old cc-by-sa OSM data > (due to its nature, with their own updates) without attribution nor > with modified map data released.

Re: [OSM-talk] Viewing pre-redaction OSM tiles?

2016-07-14 Thread Nicolás Alvarez
The 2007 tiles on mvexel's map come from http://schaal.dyndns.org/osm/ which doesn't seem to be working. -- Nicolás 2016-07-15 0:17 GMT-03:00 Marc Gemis : > Do you mean Martijn van Excel's "Now and Then" ? > https://mvexel.github.io/thenandnow/#10/52.2644/5.2899 > It does

Re: [OSM-talk] Viewing pre-redaction OSM tiles?

2016-07-14 Thread Marc Gemis
Do you mean Martijn van Excel's "Now and Then" ? https://mvexel.github.io/thenandnow/#10/52.2644/5.2899 It does has a slider, but it compares 2007 with now. regards m On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 9:42 PM, Michał Brzozowski wrote: > I am not. I just don't want to say "guilty"

Re: [OSM-talk] Viewing pre-redaction OSM tiles?

2016-07-14 Thread Michał Brzozowski
I am not. I just don't want to say "guilty" prematurely. It's a system for traffic information (public-facing site) and traffic control built by some neighboring cities. Michał On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 9:27 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > > 2016-07-14 21:11 GMT+02:00

Re: [OSM-talk] Viewing pre-redaction OSM tiles?

2016-07-14 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
2016-07-14 21:11 GMT+02:00 Michał Brzozowski : > No. They render maps on their own and also FOSM data seem not to be > *just* before the redaction (am I right? There are no changes I made > in May 2012) > maybe you are talking about Apple maps? They use both, pre-redaction

Re: [OSM-talk] Viewing pre-redaction OSM tiles?

2016-07-14 Thread Pierre Béland
ore-after.html#10/27.9083/85.5286   Pierre De : Andy Townsend <ajt1...@gmail.com> À : talk@openstreetmap.org Envoyé le : jeudi 14 juillet 2016 14h59 Objet : Re: [OSM-talk] Viewing pre-redaction OSM tiles? On 14/07/2016 19:49, Michał Brzozowski wrote: > I would swear I saw a page d

Re: [OSM-talk] Viewing pre-redaction OSM tiles?

2016-07-14 Thread Michał Brzozowski
No. They render maps on their own and also FOSM data seem not to be *just* before the redaction (am I right? There are no changes I made in May 2012) Michał On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 8:59 PM, Andy Townsend wrote: > On 14/07/2016 19:49, Michał Brzozowski wrote: >> >> I would

Re: [OSM-talk] Viewing pre-redaction OSM tiles?

2016-07-14 Thread Andy Townsend
On 14/07/2016 19:49, Michał Brzozowski wrote: I would swear I saw a page doing exactly that (with a comparison slider). The reason is I suspect that some website uses old cc-by-sa OSM data (due to its nature, with their own updates) without attribution nor with modified map data released.

Re: [OSM-talk] Viewing pre-redaction OSM tiles?

2016-07-14 Thread Nicolás Alvarez
2016-07-14 15:49 GMT-03:00 Michał Brzozowski : > Hi. > I would swear I saw a page doing exactly that (with a comparison slider). > The reason is I suspect that some website uses old cc-by-sa OSM data > (due to its nature, with their own updates) without attribution nor > with

[OSM-talk] Viewing pre-redaction OSM tiles?

2016-07-14 Thread Michał Brzozowski
Hi. I would swear I saw a page doing exactly that (with a comparison slider). The reason is I suspect that some website uses old cc-by-sa OSM data (due to its nature, with their own updates) without attribution nor with modified map data released. Michał