Carsten
Verzonden: Thursday, September 25, 2008 7:51 PM
Aan: talk@openstreetmap.org
Onderwerp: Re: [OSM-talk] clean gpx tracks
On Thursday 25 September 2008 18:53:00 Andy Robinson (blackadder-lists)
wrote:
It is not intended to protect OSM against infringement at all. It's
there
as a statement
On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 02:35:49PM +0200, Lambert Carsten wrote:
Maybe someone can point me to some editor with which I can easily clean up
the
tracks without clearing out the time stamps (personally I don't have a
problem uploading that info).
I use viking
On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 5:35 AM, Lambert Carsten [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I tried to upload a couple of gpx tracks that I had cleaned up with Josm.
They
were refused with a message that seems to suggest thy are missing time
stamps
(possibly missing altitude).
Why does openstreetmap
Lambert Carsten [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is also a privacy advantage not uploading the unnecessary time
stamps. I am sure there are many that hesitate to upload tracks for
privacy reasons.
A while ago I wrote a small shell script which did the following things:
- It removes trackpoints
Lambert Carsten wrote:
This decision needs more thought. Although I personally don't have a privacy
issue here there are clearly those that do
Just don't set your track as public - then the timestamps won't be exposed.
cheers
Richard
___
talk
On Thursday 25 September 2008 17:21:59 Richard Fairhurst wrote:
Lambert Carsten wrote:
This decision needs more thought. Although I personally don't have a
privacy issue here there are clearly those that do
Just don't set your track as public - then the timestamps won't be exposed.
I am
On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 8:45 AM, Lambert Carsten [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday 25 September 2008 17:21:59 Richard Fairhurst wrote:
Lambert Carsten wrote:
This decision needs more thought. Although I personally don't have a
privacy issue here there are clearly those that do
On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 5:01 PM, Karl Newman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The GPX tracks are intended to show the basis for the ways and other data
that is in the database, so I think one motivation for timestamps hearkens
back to a desire to show your work to defend the source of OSM data
Lambert Carsten wrote:
Sent: 25 September 2008 5:36 PM
To: talk@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] clean gpx tracks
On Thursday 25 September 2008 18:01:36 Karl wrote:
The GPX tracks are intended to show the basis for the ways and other data
that is in the database, so I think one
On Thursday 25 September 2008 18:53:00 Andy Robinson (blackadder-lists) wrote:
It is not intended to protect OSM against infringement at all. It's there
as a statement about the ethos of the project that you don't upload data
from copyright sources. Of course we all know it's possible to
10 matches
Mail list logo
