[OSM-talk] name:etymology:wikidata

2015-07-31 Thread Jo
Hi,

I like to create bridges between projects, so now I was looking into the
name:etymology:wikidata tag.

And I have a question about it.

Say, you have a
Rue de la Chapelle
Rue de la Station

I'd be inclined to make it point to the specific instance of chapel or
station. The other possibility would be to point to the word/concept of
chapel/railway station.

As far as I'm concerned, both have merit. There could be somebody who wants
to get all the roads named after station/chapel across languages. Or there
could be somebody who wants to be more specific and who wants to know which
streets are named after a specific 'object'.

There are also streets named Parkstraat (5km) apart. Named after Park
Abbey. So I think it makes sense to refer to Park Abbey and not the concept
(city) park in general.

Polyglot
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk


Re: [OSM-talk] name:etymology:wikidata

2015-07-31 Thread Jo
That's what is proposed here though:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Wikidata

And it keeps that particular wikidata tag nicely together with the name
when sorted alphabetically.

Jo

2015-07-31 17:01 GMT+02:00 Jochen Topf joc...@remote.org:

 On Fr, Jul 31, 2015 at 04:27:05 +0200, Jo wrote:
  I like to create bridges between projects, so now I was looking into the
  name:etymology:wikidata tag.

 Whatever you do, do not use an abomination like name:etymology:wikidata,
 because to a computer it looks like it is a name-Tag with the language
 etymology:wikidata like most of the name:something tags. It is hard
 enough
 already to make sense of OSM tags...

 Jochen
 --
 Jochen Topf  joc...@remote.org  http://www.jochentopf.com/
 +49-351-31778688

___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk


Re: [OSM-talk] name:etymology:wikidata

2015-07-31 Thread Lester Caine
On 31/07/15 16:09, Jo wrote:
 That's what is proposed here though:
 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Wikidata
 
 And it keeps that particular wikidata tag nicely together with the name
 when sorted alphabetically.

I don't see any point loading our servers down with wikidata content. If
you want the data that goes with a 'wikidata=*' entry then simply ask
wikidata for it. Same with wikipedia and other data sources. If you want
a sorted list get wikidata to provide it ...

-- 
Lester Caine - G8HFL
-
Contact - http://lsces.co.uk/wiki/?page=contact
L.S.Caine Electronic Services - http://lsces.co.uk
EnquirySolve - http://enquirysolve.com/
Model Engineers Digital Workshop - http://medw.co.uk
Rainbow Digital Media - http://rainbowdigitalmedia.co.uk

___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk


Re: [OSM-talk] name:etymology:wikidata

2015-07-31 Thread Ruben Maes
2015-07-31 17:21 GMT+02:00 Lester Caine les...@lsces.co.uk:
 On 31/07/15 16:09, Jo wrote:
 That's what is proposed here though:
 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Wikidata

 And it keeps that particular wikidata tag nicely together with the name
 when sorted alphabetically.

 I don't see any point loading our servers down with wikidata content. If
 you want the data that goes with a 'wikidata=*' entry then simply ask
 wikidata for it. Same with wikipedia and other data sources. If you want
 a sorted list get wikidata to provide it ...

He means that when you view it in JOSM, where tags are listed
alphabetically, they are nicely grouped together.

Well-written software should know that anything longer that 3
characters cannot be a language code and should ignore it if it isn't
interested. Especially when it has a colon in it.

This kind of information is interesting. Please go on Jo :)

I'd say make a reference to the actual object is named after, not just
to 'church'.

___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk


Re: [OSM-talk] name:etymology:wikidata

2015-07-31 Thread Ruben Maes
2015-07-31 17:31 GMT+02:00 Ruben Maes ru...@janmaes.com:
 I'd say make a reference to the actual object is named after, not just
 to 'church'.

Although this might not always be clear. There is a street called
Church Street near me and it has two churches. Which church is the
street named after? Some historical research has to be done there.
Perhaps it was named after the two churches, in which case there'd
have to be two references? Is there any way to do that apart from the
hated semi-colon separated list?

___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk


Re: [OSM-talk] name:etymology:wikidata

2015-07-31 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer


sent from a phone

 Am 31.07.2015 um 17:31 schrieb Ruben Maes ru...@janmaes.com:
 
 I'd say make a reference to the actual object is named after, not just
 to 'church'.


+1, if you then want all churches you can ask wikidata which of the tagged 
specific instances are churches.

cheers 
Martin 
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk


Re: [OSM-talk] name:etymology:wikidata

2015-07-31 Thread Lester Caine
On 31/07/15 16:35, Jo wrote:
 Due to the fact that our ids are not stable, the only reasonable way to
 add links between wikidata and OSM is to tag objects on our side. I
 spent some time convincing the people at wikidata about this over a year
 ago. I had thought it was obvious for OSM contributors.

Adding tags to id's in third party data sets is a no brainer. I'm only
complaining about THEN copying all that data into OSM. The link itself
should be enough, but things like what church a street is named after is
a little different ... THAT should have a researched answer if you want
a local tag, or you simply read the information in wikidata/wikipedia.

 2015-07-31 17:21 GMT+02:00 Lester Caine les...@lsces.co.uk
 mailto:les...@lsces.co.uk:
 
 On 31/07/15 16:09, Jo wrote:
  That's what is proposed here though:
  http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Wikidata
 
  And it keeps that particular wikidata tag nicely together with the name
  when sorted alphabetically.
 
 I don't see any point loading our servers down with wikidata content. If
 you want the data that goes with a 'wikidata=*' entry then simply ask
 wikidata for it. Same with wikipedia and other data sources. If you want
 a sorted list get wikidata to provide it ...

-- 
Lester Caine - G8HFL
-
Contact - http://lsces.co.uk/wiki/?page=contact
L.S.Caine Electronic Services - http://lsces.co.uk
EnquirySolve - http://enquirysolve.com/
Model Engineers Digital Workshop - http://medw.co.uk
Rainbow Digital Media - http://rainbowdigitalmedia.co.uk

___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk


Re: [OSM-talk] name:etymology:wikidata

2015-07-31 Thread Jochen Topf
On Fr, Jul 31, 2015 at 04:27:05 +0200, Jo wrote:
 I like to create bridges between projects, so now I was looking into the
 name:etymology:wikidata tag.

Whatever you do, do not use an abomination like name:etymology:wikidata,
because to a computer it looks like it is a name-Tag with the language
etymology:wikidata like most of the name:something tags. It is hard enough
already to make sense of OSM tags...

Jochen
-- 
Jochen Topf  joc...@remote.org  http://www.jochentopf.com/  +49-351-31778688

___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk


Re: [OSM-talk] name:etymology:wikidata

2015-07-31 Thread Jo
Due to the fact that our ids are not stable, the only reasonable way to add
links between wikidata and OSM is to tag objects on our side. I spent some
time convincing the people at wikidata about this over a year ago. I had
thought it was obvious for OSM contributors.

Polyglot

2015-07-31 17:21 GMT+02:00 Lester Caine les...@lsces.co.uk:

 On 31/07/15 16:09, Jo wrote:
  That's what is proposed here though:
  http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Wikidata
 
  And it keeps that particular wikidata tag nicely together with the name
  when sorted alphabetically.

 I don't see any point loading our servers down with wikidata content. If
 you want the data that goes with a 'wikidata=*' entry then simply ask
 wikidata for it. Same with wikipedia and other data sources. If you want
 a sorted list get wikidata to provide it ...

 --
 Lester Caine - G8HFL
 -
 Contact - http://lsces.co.uk/wiki/?page=contact
 L.S.Caine Electronic Services - http://lsces.co.uk
 EnquirySolve - http://enquirysolve.com/
 Model Engineers Digital Workshop - http://medw.co.uk
 Rainbow Digital Media - http://rainbowdigitalmedia.co.uk

 ___
 talk mailing list
 talk@openstreetmap.org
 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk


Re: [OSM-talk] name:etymology:wikidata

2015-07-31 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer


sent from a phone

 Am 31.07.2015 um 18:16 schrieb Lester Caine les...@lsces.co.uk:
 
 or you simply read the information in wikidata/wikipedia.


given that even the street of the seven churches around here (via delle sette 
chiese) doesn't have its own WP/Wikidata article yet (although referenced a 
lot, e.g. here: https://it.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Giro_delle_Sette_Chiese ), I 
don't think we should assume that every street will get its wikidata entry.

cheers 
Martin 
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk


Re: [OSM-talk] name:etymology:wikidata

2015-07-31 Thread Jo
Since all the streets of The Netherlands already made their way into
wikidata, I think it's reasonable to add other streets as well and indeed
it's possible/desirable to say in wikidata what was named after something
else.

Wikidata is not Wikipedia, which indeed suffers from the problem that what
I'm inclined to add there gets deleted for all sorts of reasons. It can go
into wikidata though.

What I'm wondering about though, is how to retrieve the data once again. At
the moment I added name:etymology:wikidata tags to all the streets
referring back to Leuven (a town in Belgium), making sure to add the proper
tags for people with Leuven/Louvain in their name.

At this point it's easy to create an Overpass API query to find all these
streets once again in a convenient way, which I then added to the wikipedia
pages about Leuven:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leuven#External_links

I have no idea how to go about this when the querying needs to be performed
in wikidata itself, then transfered to an Overpass query to fetch the
actual streets.

That said, I see your point about adding source references for the original
research.

Jo

2015-07-31 19:31 GMT+02:00 Lester Caine les...@lsces.co.uk:

 On 31/07/15 17:47, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
  or you simply read the information in wikidata/wikipedia.
 
  given that even the street of the seven churches around here (via delle
 sette chiese) doesn't have its own WP/Wikidata article yet (although
 referenced a lot, e.g. here:
 https://it.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Giro_delle_Sette_Chiese ), I don't think
 we should assume that every street will get its wikidata entry.

 Original research needs to be stored somewhere. I have something of an
 aversion to wikipedia simply because work we did a few years back kept
 being deleted as 'not noteworthy' or simply 'rejected'. OSM is not the
 place to document this sort of research, that is the sort of material
 that SHOULD be in wikipedia and cross referenced by wikidata especially
 where the sources need to be identified. There needs to be proper
 cooperation and it easier now to create the missing pages in wikipedia,
 which can then be linked to OSM. Keep each project to what it is good at
 and sort out procedures that direct information to the right boxes.

 --
 Lester Caine - G8HFL
 -
 Contact - http://lsces.co.uk/wiki/?page=contact
 L.S.Caine Electronic Services - http://lsces.co.uk
 EnquirySolve - http://enquirysolve.com/
 Model Engineers Digital Workshop - http://medw.co.uk
 Rainbow Digital Media - http://rainbowdigitalmedia.co.uk

 ___
 talk mailing list
 talk@openstreetmap.org
 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk


Re: [OSM-talk] name:etymology:wikidata

2015-07-31 Thread Sarah Hoffmann
On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 05:31:48PM +0200, Ruben Maes wrote:
 2015-07-31 17:21 GMT+02:00 Lester Caine les...@lsces.co.uk:
  On 31/07/15 16:09, Jo wrote:
  That's what is proposed here though:
  http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Wikidata
 
  And it keeps that particular wikidata tag nicely together with the name
  when sorted alphabetically.
 
  I don't see any point loading our servers down with wikidata content. If
  you want the data that goes with a 'wikidata=*' entry then simply ask
  wikidata for it. Same with wikipedia and other data sources. If you want
  a sorted list get wikidata to provide it ...
 
 He means that when you view it in JOSM, where tags are listed
 alphabetically, they are nicely grouped together.
 
 Well-written software should know that anything longer that 3
 characters cannot be a language code and should ignore it if it isn't
 interested. Especially when it has a colon in it.

If only it was that easy. Just a few examples from the name
tags most used:

name:ko_rm
name:ja_rm
name:sr-Latn
name:right
name:left

The rule that name:* is some form of name for the object at hand
has worked reasoably well so far for software like search engines
that somehow try to capture all names.

___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk


Re: [OSM-talk] name:etymology:wikidata

2015-07-31 Thread Lester Caine
On 31/07/15 17:47, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
 or you simply read the information in wikidata/wikipedia.
 
 given that even the street of the seven churches around here (via delle 
 sette chiese) doesn't have its own WP/Wikidata article yet (although 
 referenced a lot, e.g. here: 
 https://it.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Giro_delle_Sette_Chiese ), I don't think we 
 should assume that every street will get its wikidata entry.

Original research needs to be stored somewhere. I have something of an
aversion to wikipedia simply because work we did a few years back kept
being deleted as 'not noteworthy' or simply 'rejected'. OSM is not the
place to document this sort of research, that is the sort of material
that SHOULD be in wikipedia and cross referenced by wikidata especially
where the sources need to be identified. There needs to be proper
cooperation and it easier now to create the missing pages in wikipedia,
which can then be linked to OSM. Keep each project to what it is good at
and sort out procedures that direct information to the right boxes.

-- 
Lester Caine - G8HFL
-
Contact - http://lsces.co.uk/wiki/?page=contact
L.S.Caine Electronic Services - http://lsces.co.uk
EnquirySolve - http://enquirysolve.com/
Model Engineers Digital Workshop - http://medw.co.uk
Rainbow Digital Media - http://rainbowdigitalmedia.co.uk

___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk