[xquery-talk] OT: Suggestion for new OSS SCC site / tool for xmlsh ? SourceForge has gone to the dark side.

2013-11-25 Thread David Lee
I am so annoyed by this thread and the associated links which seem to clear the FUD http://www.gluster.org/2013/08/how-far-the-once-mighty-sourceforge-has-fallen/ Basically SourceForge has been bought by Dice and now is encouraging users to use their Malware infected (well Encouraged

Re: [xquery-talk] [xml-dev] OT: Suggestion for new OSS SCC site / tool for xmlsh ? SourceForge has gone to the dark side.

2013-11-25 Thread Michael Sokolov
On 11/25/2013 09:23 AM, David Lee wrote: I am so annoyed by this thread and the associated links which seem to clear the FUD http://www.gluster.org/2013/08/how-far-the-once-mighty-sourceforge-has-fallen/ ... Do I need (want to?) learn git ? and move to github ? My Git experience so far has

Re: [xquery-talk] OT: Suggestion for new OSS SCC site / tool for xmlsh ? SourceForge has gone to the dark side.

2013-11-25 Thread Adam Retter
Hi David, I have been upset by the decline of SourceForge for several years now. Even before this installer junk, it seemed to me that each consecutive website re-design that they forced on us was worse and slower than the previous. The final straw for me was that their new Subversion web browser

Re: [xquery-talk] [xml-dev] OT: Suggestion for new OSS SCC site / tool for xmlsh ? SourceForge has gone to the dark side.

2013-11-25 Thread John Snelson
Github's pretty good - I used this to become familiar with Git (your life will get better ;-)): http://ftp.newartisans.com/pub/git.from.bottom.up.pdf The main issue I have is it's lack of release management support. And yes, unlike HTML 5 I do believe having release checkpoints benefits

Re: [xquery-talk] [xml-dev] OT: Suggestion for new OSS SCC site / tool for xmlsh ? SourceForge has gone to the dark side.

2013-11-25 Thread Adam Retter
Actually I like that GitHub just expects 'tags' and 'milestones' because this is all that you need to integrate with your release management tools. I think here the 'less if more' approach is brilliant. We use several systems together for our release management but ultimately its all Maven at the

Re: [xquery-talk] [xml-dev] OT: Suggestion for new OSS SCC site / tool for xmlsh ? SourceForge has gone to the dark side.

2013-11-25 Thread James Fuller
On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 3:53 PM, John Snelson john.snel...@marklogic.comwrote: Github's pretty good - I used this to become familiar with Git (your life will get better ;-)): http://ftp.newartisans.com/pub/git.from.bottom.up.pdf The main issue I have is it's lack of release management

Re: [xquery-talk] [xml-dev] OT: Suggestion for new OSS SCC site / tool for xmlsh ? SourceForge has gone to the dark side.

2013-11-25 Thread Liam R E Quin
On Mon, 2013-11-25 at 14:23 +, David Lee wrote: Basically SourceForge has been bought [...] Suggestions welcome ... The near-universal answer is github. Do I need (want to?) learn git ? and move to github ? Probably. It seems to be winning out as the replacement. The GIMP image