Re: [Talk-us] [Imports] Import WestCOG building footprints in south-west Connecticut

2020-08-29 Diskussionsfäden joe.sapletal
I was going to look at the buildings too. I’ve used a tool in ArcGIS to correct some pretty awful buildings, but I couldn’t download them either.If there is no hurry, I’d check in again with the contact on Monday. It would be nice to have the buildings with addresses on them. Joe

Re: [Talk-us] Mapping rail trails

2019-06-24 Diskussionsfäden joe.sapletal
https://gisdata.mn.gov/dataset/us-mn-state-metrogis-trans-metro-colabtiv-trails-bike Someone could go nuts with this data from MN. Joe -Original Message- From: Kevin Kenny Sent: Monday, June 24, 2019 11:15 AM To: Richard Fairhurst Cc: talk-us Subject: Re: [Talk-us] Mapping rail

Re: [Talk-us] Use without Attribution

2017-06-12 Diskussionsfäden joe.sapletal
If you close the All Layers window it appears in the lower right, just like on the other implementations on their site. Is this what you are looking for? Joe From: Brian May Sent: Monday, June 12, 2017 9:38 AM To: talk-us@openstreetmap.org Cc: hans.dekryge...@gmail.com Subject: Re: [Talk-us]

Re: [Talk-us] [Imports] Fort Worth, Texas import

2017-05-27 Diskussionsfäden joe.sapletal
Andrew, Looks good to me and a great follow up to the Dallas project. I would suggest contacting the project lead for project 95, they appear to work at mapbox. I contacted the mapbox user that created a digitizing project that overlapped my import project and they changed the status on the

Re: [Talk-us] Dakota County, MN Building Import

2017-04-06 Diskussionsfäden joe.sapletal
On that page, it states Dakota County encourages public use of this GIS data. “The County Board of Commissioners adopted a policy of free and open GIS data, in collaboration with the other six metropolitan counties in the Twin Cities. More information on this initiative is available from

Re: [Talk-us] Dakota County, MN Building Import

2017-04-06 Diskussionsfäden joe.sapletal
Free and Open. Dakota County encourages the use of its published data and supports it being added to OSM. They are aware of the project and do not object. Joe From: Rory McCann Sent: Thursday, April 6, 2017 3:49 AM To: talk-us@openstreetmap.org Cc: impo...@openstreetmap.org Subject: Re:

[Talk-us] Dakota County, MN Building Import

2017-04-05 Diskussionsfäden joe.sapletal
This project is now on the US Tasking Server. http://tasks.openstreetmap.us/project/88 Import page on the wiki - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Minnesota/DakotaCounty/Buildings_Import Thanks in advance to all that participate. Joe ___ Talk-us

[Talk-us] Dakota County, MN Building and Address Import

2017-03-15 Diskussionsfäden joe.sapletal
Ok, I’m back and ready to proceed. I’ve created a pretty decent dataset from the Dakota County buildings, address points and parcel data. Project page https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Minnesota/DakotaCounty/Buildings_Import GitHub repository with sample

[Talk-us] Dakota County, MN Data

2017-02-22 Diskussionsfäden joe.sapletal
If anyone is interested, there are some datasets available to update streets, county parks and municipal boundaries in Dakota County, MN. (my employer) This is the same data we give to Esri for their basemaps. I’ve posted links and more information on my blog -

[Talk-us] Dakota County, MN Building Import - chunking

2016-10-01 Diskussionsfäden joe.sapletal
So I’m back at it now that I have some time to get this building import going again. I have a pretty good process for assembling the data to create buildings with addresses. The buildings dataset has about 165,000 building polygons, many of which will have some sort of attributes before I