Re: [OSM-talk] Everything is a tertiary road

[Ben Discoe]

Stephan,

I can see you are correct that user "4719341" created thousands of
roads which are incorrectly tagged tertiary.  Looking at the aerial,
almost all of them should be correctly tagged "unclassified" or
"track"; very few are actual tertiaries.  They did this across almost
the entire Magway Region
(https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5996479/)

Of course the best thing would be to try to contact the user and get
them to fix their own tags (and of course, any future roads that they
make).  If that does not prove possible or they are unwilling, then a
possible answer to "how can this be repaired", is:

1. Load the whole Magway region into JOSM.
2. Find their work using a search (type:way user:4719341
highway:tertiary) (I did this, and found around 17,000 results)
3. Mass-change those ways to unclassified.
4. In a subsequent manual pass, correct the tagging to track (perhaps
30% of their work) and actual tertiary (perhaps 2%).

That way, only a minority of the roads would have to be manually
changed, because unclassified is correct for the majority.
Naturally, we should wait to hear from the user first.

-Ben

___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Re: [OSM-talk] Unify Mapping and wiki accounts? -- WAS: Vote cheating?

[Nicolás Alvarez]

El 18 mar. 2018, a la(s) 20:50, François Lacombe  
escribió:

> 
> 2018-03-19 0:38 GMT+01:00 Michael Kugelmann :
>>> Am 18.03.2018 um 20:45 schrieb Richard:
>>> fundamental decission - maybe osm and osm-wiki accounts should be the same?
>> This had been independent in the very old history. And now you have 
>> conflicts => will not work w/o huge effort...
>> There had been requests like this 5 years ago or so w/o success. Not because 
>> nobody wanted to implement but because it was not possible.
> 
> This is a great idea.
> 
> Can you sum up what are the technical issues which make it not possible 
> please ?

Suppose user 'John' currently has a wiki account called 'JohnW'. That's 
currently possible, since the accounts are independent. What do you do if you 
unify the accounts? Does OSM user John get a new wiki account called John? What 
if that wiki account already exists? Or does he have to manually connect the 
OSM and Wiki accounts?

What if an OSM user called JohnW also exists (but never used the wiki yet), 
what wiki account do you create for him if the name JohnW is already taken on 
the wiki?

Users can rename OSM accounts. What happens if a user has accounts on both OSM 
and the wiki, with the same name, but changes his user name to "Javiersanp"? 
That name isn't taken in OSM, but it's taken in the wiki. Does the rename get 
rejected?

There are different OSM users "nicolas" and "Nicolas". Wiki usernames always 
have a uppercase first letter, so if accounts get unified, those two different 
OSM users can't get different wiki accounts. There is a similar problem with 
the wiki considering " " (space) and "_" (underscore) equivalent, while OSM 
doesn't.


I would love it if wiki accounts and OSM accounts were unified, but that would 
need to be done since the start. Now it seems too hard to do it; too many 
conflicts with existing accounts.

-- 
Nicolás___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

[talk-au] Tathra Fires

[Nick Hocking]

I'll map all the houses in Tathra tonight unless someone else beats me to
it.
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au

Re: [Talk-us] Help fight advertising

[Jordan Brod]

I went looking for any information printed in guidelines or code of conduct
about advertising in the attributes of a feature and I couldn't find where
it is approved/prohibited or even mentioned.  Does anybody know where the
rule against this is?

On Mar 18, 2018 6:42 PM, "Shawn K. Quinn"  wrote:

> On 03/01/2018 04:44 PM, Frederik Ramm wrote:
> > there have also been situations where a local mapper had diligently
> > copied a business's sales slogan into the description tag and was
> > then upset to see this removed.
>
> If they are upset about it, tough turkey, it doesn't belong there.
>
> > As more and more SEO firms start dumping their stuff onto OSM (and
> > here I am not talking about those who actually talk to us and listen,
> > but those who don't care), this is becoming a fight that needs to be
> > fought by the community as a whole.
>
> My approach this morning was different. I did an Overpass query for a
> huge chunk of Texas (west of San Antonio, then going east including
> Austin, Houston, and most suburbs, going to somewhere east of Beaumont)
> for anything with a description tag. I then saved the layer from JOSM
> and edited each occurrence of the description tag by hand (which also
> made it easier to do things like just change "description" to "name"). I
> made a few other related edits and submitted as changeset 57284276.
> Generally speaking, I purged anything that looked like it was trying to
> sell me on the business, including ad-copy-like descriptions of local
> libraries. I also deleted any description=* that was duplicative of the
> content of name=* or which added no useful information, and added
> appropriate tags where description=* had been used by a sloppy/lazy
> mapper to say things like "bowling alley" or to include opening hours.
>
> By the time I had gotten around to doing this, I had completely
> forgotten about the CSV export, though I was able to go through the
> entire chunk I had exported with my text editor in the span of a
> half-hour or so (I did a search for "description" and just kept hitting
> "next match" when ready to move on).
>
> My Java programming skills are nearly non-existent, but it is tempting
> to (re-)learn enough to write a plugin to automate the process from
> within JOSM, perhaps naming it something like "AdTerminator".
>
> --
> Shawn K. Quinn 
> http://www.rantroulette.com
> http://www.skqrecordquest.com
>
> ___
> Talk-us mailing list
> Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
>
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us

Re: [OSM-talk] Unify Mapping and wiki accounts? -- WAS: Vote cheating?

[François Lacombe]

2018-03-19 0:38 GMT+01:00 Michael Kugelmann :

> Am 18.03.2018 um 20:45 schrieb Richard:
>
>> fundamental decission - maybe osm and osm-wiki accounts should be the
>> same?
>>
> This had been independent in the very old history. And now you have
> conflicts => will not work w/o huge effort...
> There had been requests like this 5 years ago or so w/o success. Not
> because nobody wanted to implement but because it was not possible.
>

This is a great idea.

Can you sum up what are the technical issues which make it not possible
please ?

François
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Re: [Talk-us] Help fight advertising

[Shawn K. Quinn]

On 03/01/2018 04:44 PM, Frederik Ramm wrote:
> there have also been situations where a local mapper had diligently
> copied a business's sales slogan into the description tag and was
> then upset to see this removed.

If they are upset about it, tough turkey, it doesn't belong there.

> As more and more SEO firms start dumping their stuff onto OSM (and
> here I am not talking about those who actually talk to us and listen,
> but those who don't care), this is becoming a fight that needs to be
> fought by the community as a whole.

My approach this morning was different. I did an Overpass query for a
huge chunk of Texas (west of San Antonio, then going east including
Austin, Houston, and most suburbs, going to somewhere east of Beaumont)
for anything with a description tag. I then saved the layer from JOSM
and edited each occurrence of the description tag by hand (which also
made it easier to do things like just change "description" to "name"). I
made a few other related edits and submitted as changeset 57284276.
Generally speaking, I purged anything that looked like it was trying to
sell me on the business, including ad-copy-like descriptions of local
libraries. I also deleted any description=* that was duplicative of the
content of name=* or which added no useful information, and added
appropriate tags where description=* had been used by a sloppy/lazy
mapper to say things like "bowling alley" or to include opening hours.

By the time I had gotten around to doing this, I had completely
forgotten about the CSV export, though I was able to go through the
entire chunk I had exported with my text editor in the span of a
half-hour or so (I did a search for "description" and just kept hitting
"next match" when ready to move on).

My Java programming skills are nearly non-existent, but it is tempting
to (re-)learn enough to write a plugin to automate the process from
within JOSM, perhaps naming it something like "AdTerminator".

-- 
Shawn K. Quinn 
http://www.rantroulette.com
http://www.skqrecordquest.com

___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us

Re: [OSM-talk] Unify Mapping and wiki accounts? -- WAS: Vote cheating?

[Michael Kugelmann]

Am 18.03.2018 um 20:45 schrieb Richard:

fundamental decission - maybe osm and osm-wiki accounts should be the same?
This had been independent in the very old history. And now you have 
conflicts => will not work w/o huge effort...
There had been requests like this 5 years ago or so w/o success. Not 
because nobody wanted to implement but because it was not possible.



BR,
Michael.


___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Re: [Talk-it] Rendering "cliff"

[aldoct]

Grazie. Ho inserito io le ways (Regione Sicilia), quindi ritengo in modo
corretto. Farò la segnalazione che dici. Si segnala in italiano?
Saluti



--
Sent from: http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/Italy-General-f5324174.html

___
Talk-it mailing list
Talk-it@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it

[Talk-es] Hemos hablado del proyecto del importar el catastro en el podcast de Birras

[Miguel de Dios Matias]

Buenas.

En el último podcast de Birras en la sección de noticias sobre el
proyecto de importación del catastro que esta tan vivo en la comunidad
española de OSM.

https://birrasybits.wordpress.com/2018/03/18/byb-2x08-los-testigos-de-godot/

Si hay alguna errata o queréis aportar algo mas de información, no lo
dudéis y hacemos un especial sobre OSM.

Saludos.
___
Talk-es mailing list
Talk-es@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-es

Re: [Talk-it] Rendering "cliff"

[Volker Schmidt]

Non posso controllare al momento, ma non è escluso, che c'è un errore nel
rendering della mtbmap.
Se sei sicuro basta scrivere all'autore della Mtbmap,
extremecar...@gmail.com.
Attenzione, devi controllare la stessa scarpata sulle due renderizzazioni.
Non so dove hai fatto il confronto, ma qua in Veneto abbiamo zone dove le
scarpate hanno il senso a caso, dovuto a dati importati non idonei.
Volker

On 18 Mar 2018 10:27 p.m., "aldoct"  wrote:

Qualcuno sa spiegarmi perché ad una corretta mappatura della scarpata
(Cliff,
appunto) che lascia a destra la parte bassa e che in fase di mappatura su
JOSM mostra correttamente i triangoletti verso valle, il rendering che
restituisce su Base Camp il setup di "mtbitaly.exe" sia con i triangoletti
verso monte?
Saluti



--
Sent from: http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/Italy-General-f5324174.html

___
Talk-it mailing list
Talk-it@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
___
Talk-it mailing list
Talk-it@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it

[Talk-us] Amtrak network=Amtrak tagging

[OSM Volunteer stevea]

Per our Amtrak wiki, https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Amtrak , I'd 
appreciate some feedback on conflating all Amtrak route=train relations to be 
tagged network=Amtrak.  Currently, some have this tag, some have network=Amtrak 
Intercity.  I find the latter to be superfluous and confusing and would like 
them to all have the same network=Amtrak tag.  Does this seem reasonable?

Thanks,
SteveA
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us

[OSM-talk] Everything is a tertiary road

[Stephan Knauss]

Hi,

I'm not actively mapping in Myanmar or Vietnam. But I run a tool to 
detect major highways suddenly ending.


During the last few months I see a drastic increase of these kind of 
tagging mistakes.


Check out this area. Nearly everything is mapped as a tertiary.

http://compare.osm-tools.org/loose.html?zoom=14=20.4022=95.43368=BT

I never got response to changeset comments.

This user with ru language setting is very involved or the only source 
to thousands of these faulty taggings:


https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/4719341

I count nearly 23.000 highway=tertiary by this specific user.

Is someone aware of a large-scale directed mapping activity there? Can 
someone, preferably Russian speaking get in contact please and educate 
about proper road tagging?


How can this be repaired? It is a massive amount...

It hurts a bit to see OSM going down the drain there.


Vietnam is not that drastic. Still lots of small roads tagged with 
strange looking names, coming from user-accounts which seems to be 
created for exactly that purpose.


Again a country with no active community which could cry for help after 
being force-mapped.


Stephan

___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

[Talk-it] Rendering "cliff"

[aldoct]

Qualcuno sa spiegarmi perché ad una corretta mappatura della scarpata (Cliff,
appunto) che lascia a destra la parte bassa e che in fase di mappatura su
JOSM mostra correttamente i triangoletti verso valle, il rendering che
restituisce su Base Camp il setup di "mtbitaly.exe" sia con i triangoletti
verso monte?
Saluti



--
Sent from: http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/Italy-General-f5324174.html

___
Talk-it mailing list
Talk-it@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it

[Talk-de] 10 EUR Bahnrabatt für Changelist reviews

[Stephan Knauss]

Hallo,

es gibt gerade wieder etwas Kritik an der Qualität mit der Facebook in 
Thailand das Mapping durchführt.


unpassende Klassifizierung, nicht verbunden oder plötzlich endend, 
schlechte Geometrie oder was ganz anderes.


Wir haben demnächst einen Konferenz-Call mit dem Facebook Team und 
würden da gerne noch etwas mehr Beispiele für schlechtes Mapping 
präsentieren. Vielleicht hilft das ja dabei dass Facebook ihr 
Mapper-Training etwas verbessert.


Die verwendeten Accounts sind hier gelistet, sind aber recht leicht 
erkennbar, da nach Schema: VLD001, RVR001, jeweils mit anderen Nummern.


https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/AI-Assisted_Road_Tracing

Im Süden von Thailand sind die Edits sehr präsent, da es dort kaum 
andere Mapper gab.


Bitte kommentiert schlechte Changes direkt in einem Changeset comment.

Wäre nett wenn ihr mir dann auch einen Link schickt, dann habe ich das 
gleich griffbereit. Wir werden aber auf jeden Fall die letzten Comments 
der Facebook Mapper vor dem Meeting ansehen.


Als kleines Dankeschön für die Unterstützung gibt es für die zwei 
schnellsten Rückmeldungen zu schlechten Edits jeweils einen 10 EUR 
Gutschein aus der ferrero-hinundweg.de Aktion mit dem man günstiger 
Bahnfahren kann.


Vielen Dank schon mal für eure Hilfe,

Stephan


___
Talk-de mailing list
Talk-de@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-de

Re: [OSM-talk] Unify Mapping and wiki accounts? -- WAS: Vote cheating?

[john whelan]

Sounds sensible.

Cheerio John

On Sun, 18 Mar 2018 16:04 Andrew Hain,  wrote:

> Interesting idea. The wiki dates from before OAuth of course, even before
> the fiddle we implemented for trac and the forum. It must be just about the
> only internal communication space not using the main accounts.
>
>
> --
>
> Andrew
>
>
> --
> *From:* Richard 
> *Sent:* 18 March 2018 19:45
> *To:* James
> *Cc:* OpenStreetMap talk mailing list
> *Subject:* [OSM-talk] Unify Mapping and wiki accounts? -- WAS: Vote
> cheating?
>
> On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 11:18:38AM +, James wrote:
> > You could also argue the opposite way: Not everyone in OSM edits the
> wiki,
> > thus probably doesnt have an account, thus to participate, they need to
> > create an account to vote
>
> fundamental decission - maybe osm and osm-wiki accounts should be the same?
>
> I have recent reports from one mapper sending me messages through OSM
> messaging
> that he had trouble setting up a wiki account and commenting on my talk
> page so
> clearly there is some confusion about the accounts and by my estimate only
> a tiny
> minority of mappers could ever have any use for separate mapping and wiki
> accounts.
>
> Richard
>
> ___
> talk mailing list
> talk@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
> talk Info Page - lists.openstreetmap.org Mailing Lists
> 
> lists.openstreetmap.org
> To see the collection of prior postings to the list, visit the talk
> Archives. Using talk: To post a message to all the list members, send email
> to ...
>
> ___
> talk mailing list
> talk@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
>
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Re: [OSM-talk] Unify Mapping and wiki accounts? -- WAS: Vote cheating?

[ajt1...@gmail.com]

On 18/03/2018 19:45, Richard wrote:


fundamental decission - maybe osm and osm-wiki accounts should be the same?



Interestingly, there's recently been a suggestion on OSMF-talk about an 
"OSMF-owned engine for social surveys":


https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/osmf-talk/2018-March/005106.html

Best Regards,
Andy


___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Re: [OSM-talk] Unify Mapping and wiki accounts? -- WAS: Vote cheating?

[Andrew Hain]

Interesting idea. The wiki dates from before OAuth of course, even before the 
fiddle we implemented for trac and the forum. It must be just about the only 
internal communication space not using the main accounts.


--

Andrew



From: Richard 
Sent: 18 March 2018 19:45
To: James
Cc: OpenStreetMap talk mailing list
Subject: [OSM-talk] Unify Mapping and wiki accounts? -- WAS: Vote cheating?

On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 11:18:38AM +, James wrote:
> You could also argue the opposite way: Not everyone in OSM edits the wiki,
> thus probably doesnt have an account, thus to participate, they need to
> create an account to vote

fundamental decission - maybe osm and osm-wiki accounts should be the same?

I have recent reports from one mapper sending me messages through OSM messaging
that he had trouble setting up a wiki account and commenting on my talk page so
clearly there is some confusion about the accounts and by my estimate only a 
tiny
minority of mappers could ever have any use for separate mapping and wiki
accounts.

Richard

___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
talk Info Page - lists.openstreetmap.org Mailing 
Lists
lists.openstreetmap.org
To see the collection of prior postings to the list, visit the talk Archives. 
Using talk: To post a message to all the list members, send email to ...


___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

[OSM-talk] Unify Mapping and wiki accounts? -- WAS: Vote cheating?

[Richard]

On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 11:18:38AM +, James wrote:
> You could also argue the opposite way: Not everyone in OSM edits the wiki,
> thus probably doesnt have an account, thus to participate, they need to
> create an account to vote

fundamental decission - maybe osm and osm-wiki accounts should be the same?

I have recent reports from one mapper sending me messages through OSM messaging 
that he had trouble setting up a wiki account and commenting on my talk page so 
clearly there is some confusion about the accounts and by my estimate only a 
tiny 
minority of mappers could ever have any use for separate mapping and wiki 
accounts.

Richard

___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Re: [Talk-lv] jāņasēta mūs izaicina

[pec...@gmail.com]

Es nākamnedēļ došos uz Ogri, nostaigāšu gar tiltiem.

Pēteris.

2018. gada 18. marts 14:03 Rihards  rakstīja:

> varbūt kādam sanāk apciemot ogres tiltus - ideāli būtu svaigas mapillary
> bildes :)
>
> https://twitter.com/kartes_lv/status/968457959243206656
> --
>  Rihards
>
> ___
> Talk-lv mailing list
> Talk-lv@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-lv
>



-- 
mortigi tempo
Pēteris Krišjānis
___
Talk-lv mailing list
Talk-lv@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-lv

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Places PMR ?

[marc marc]

Bonjour,

Le 18. 03. 18 à 19:39, PanierAvide a écrit :
> En ce qui concerne les places PMR, j'ai pour habitude de renseigner un 
> combo amenity=parking_space + capacity:disabled=1 + wheelchair=yes (si 
> la place est vraiment accessible, ce qui n'est pas toujours le cas). 
> J'ai cru comprendre qu'il y avait aussi possibilité d'utiliser 
> parking_space=disabled.
> 
> Ma question est la suivante : quelle est donc la bonne pratique sur la 
> question des places PMR ? Car ça vaudrait le coup de s'accorder et de 
> l'expliciter sur le wiki :-)

Je me suis posé la même question le mois passé et je n'ai pas trouvé
de réponse satisfaisante.

parking_space=disabled a l'air d'être une spécificité franco-française 
~7000 en France sur les ~8000 dans le monde
c'est pas très cohérent avec parking= (en surface ou souterrain)

à côté de cela, il y a :
disabled=designated pour désigner que l'objet a été fait pour une 
personne à mobilité réduite (à combiner souvent avec access=no)

ou
access:disabled=designated
access:role=no

ou
access:conditional=designated @ disabled

chacun des 3 ayant été fait par des propals différentes
et à mon avis je ne serrais pas surpris qu'aucune des 3 ne soie 
réellement utilisé au niveau "utilisation des données"
Je pense que ce serrait utile d'essayer de préciser cela sur tagging

quand à wheelchair=yes ou designated, pour moi il est différent du reste 
puisqu'il indique que c'est utilisable (ce qui est fort différent de 
réservé à)

Pour le moment, j'ai mis les 4 ou 5 ce qui n'est évidement pas idéal.

Cordialement,
Marc
___
Talk-fr mailing list
Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-fr

[OSM-talk-fr] Places PMR ?

[PanierAvide]

Bonjour,

En lisant le wiki, je me rends compte que pour décrire les places de 
parking individuelles (amenity=parking_space), on est pas sensé pouvoir 
utiliser les variantes de capacity:*=* [1], mais plutôt restreindre avec 
des critères d'accessibilité plus classiques.


En ce qui concerne les places PMR, j'ai pour habitude de renseigner un 
combo amenity=parking_space + capacity:disabled=1 + wheelchair=yes (si 
la place est vraiment accessible, ce qui n'est pas toujours le cas). 
J'ai cru comprendre qu'il y avait aussi possibilité d'utiliser 
parking_space=disabled.


Ma question est la suivante : quelle est donc la bonne pratique sur la 
question des places PMR ? Car ça vaudrait le coup de s'accorder et de 
l'expliciter sur le wiki :-)


Cordialement,

Adrien.

[1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:amenity%3Dparking_space

--
PanierAvide
Géomaticien & développeur


___
Talk-fr mailing list
Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-fr

Re: [Talk-at] [Info] Invitation to ÖRK/MSF Mapathon Weltwassertag (fwd)

[Johann Haag]

Die OSM Identität ist zugleich auch das Login zum Web-Forum, einfacher geht´s 
wirklich nicht: 
Zur Forums- Suche, wir schreiben aktuell das Jahr 2018 Tipp: 
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/search.php

Wenn es um ÖRK Initiativen geht, hört sich für mich der talk Spaß auf.
Wir haben auch eine Verantwortung.

Grüße Johann
OSM wiki the map

> Am 18.03.2018 um 11:25 schrieb grubernd :
> 
> 
> danke für's crossposting.
> 
> 
> On 2018-03-17 09:27, Johann Haag wrote:
>> Hallo Stephan,
>> inzwischen ist das OSM Web Forum bei 353 Themen und 1.469 Beiträgen 
>> angelangt. Was in internationalen Maßstäben gemessen sehr respektabel ist.
> 
> und ich habe immer noch über 6.587 ungelesene Mails aus dem Zeitraum 2008 bis 
> 2014. ich habe seinerzeit einfach das gesamte talk.at Archiv[1] in meinen 
> lokalen Mailclient importiert, damit kann man jederzeit mit jedem beliebigen 
> textfähigen Programm darin suchen.
> 
> alles Dinge die in einem Forum nicht gehen.
> 
> 
> grüsse,
> grubernd
> 
> [1] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-at/
> 
> ___
> Talk-at mailing list
> Talk-at@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-at


___
Talk-at mailing list
Talk-at@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-at

[Diversity-talk] OSM and Diversity chat - round 2 Asia and West Coast Americas

[Heather Leson]

Dear Colleagues, Kate and I seek 2 people to co-host the next OSM and
Gender call. Would you be able to help?

Also I have been responding to questions/comments here. Any feedback on
that is always welcome.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Heather%20Leson/diary/43458

Heather

Heather
Heather Leson
heatherle...@gmail.com
Twitter/skype: HeatherLeson
Blog: textontechs.com
___
Diversity-talk mailing list
Code of Conduct: 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Diversity/MailingList/CodeOfConduct
Contact the mods (private): diversity-talk-ow...@openstreetmap.org

[Talk-lv] jāņasēta mūs izaicina

[Rihards]

varbūt kādam sanāk apciemot ogres tiltus - ideāli būtu svaigas mapillary
bildes :)

https://twitter.com/kartes_lv/status/968457959243206656
-- 
 Rihards

___
Talk-lv mailing list
Talk-lv@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-lv

Re: [Talk-at] [Info] Invitation to ÖRK/MSF Mapathon Weltwassertag (fwd)

[grubernd]

danke für's crossposting.


On 2018-03-17 09:27, Johann Haag wrote:

Hallo Stephan,
inzwischen ist das OSM Web Forum bei 353 Themen und 1.469 Beiträgen 
angelangt. Was in internationalen Maßstäben gemessen sehr respektabel ist.


und ich habe immer noch über 6.587 ungelesene Mails aus dem Zeitraum 
2008 bis 2014. ich habe seinerzeit einfach das gesamte talk.at Archiv[1] 
in meinen lokalen Mailclient importiert, damit kann man jederzeit mit 
jedem beliebigen textfähigen Programm darin suchen.


alles Dinge die in einem Forum nicht gehen.


grüsse,
grubernd

[1] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-at/

___
Talk-at mailing list
Talk-at@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-at

Re: [Talk-at] [Info] Invitation to ÖRK/MSF Mapathon Weltwassertag (fwd)

[Stephan Bösch-Plepelits]

On Sat, Mar 17, 2018 at 09:27:21AM +0100, Johann Haag wrote:
> Hallo Stephan,
> inzwischen ist das OSM Web Forum bei 353 Themen und 1.469 Beiträgen 
> angelangt. Was in internationalen Maßstäben gemessen sehr respektabel ist.
> Nachdem mir aufgefallen ist, dass es im talk.at Forum kaum Aktivitäten gibt, 
> habe ich Deine Ankündegung im Sinne der ÖRK Initiative, auch im offiziellen 
> OpenStreetMap Austria Web Forum veröffentlicht. Ich hoffe die Ankündigung der 
> ÖRK Mapathon Aktion auf allen uns zur verfügung stehenden Kanälen ist in 
> Deinen Sinne. 
> 
> Ref: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=61685
> 
Ja, gerne. Danke!

Zum Rest des Threads: Ich persönlich hab mit Foren nie viel anfangen
können, Sorry! Ich werde in Zukunft versuchen daran zu denken,
Ankündigungen auch dort zu posten.

Zum Sinn des Mapathon: Ich finde eine wichtige Komponente ist das
Networking mit anderen Leuten und Organisationen.

grüße,
Stephan
-- 
Seid unbequem, seid Sand, nicht Öl im Getriebe der Welt! - Günther Eich
,--.
| Stephan Bösch-Plepelits  ❤ code ❤ urbanism ❤ free software ❤ cycling |
| Projects:|
| > OpenStreetMap: openstreetbrowser.org > openstreetmap.at|
| > Urbanism: Radlobby Wien 15 |
| Contact: |
| > Mail: sk...@xover.mud.at > Blog: plepe.at > Code: github.com/plepe |
| > Twitter: twitter.com/plepe > Jabber: sk...@jabber.at   |
`--'


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
Talk-at mailing list
Talk-at@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-at

Wochennotiz Nr. 399 06.03.2018–12.03.2018

[Wochennotizteam]

Hallo,

die Wochennotiz Nr. 399 mit vielen wichtigen Neuigkeiten aus der 
OpenStreetMap-Welt ist da:

http://blog.openstreetmap.de/blog/2018/03/wochennotiz-nr-399/

Viel Spaß beim Lesen!
___
Talk-de mailing list
Talk-de@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-de

Wochennotiz Nr. 399 06.03.2018–12.03.2018

[Wochennotizteam]

Hallo,

die Wochennotiz Nr. 399 mit vielen wichtigen Neuigkeiten aus der 
OpenStreetMap-Welt ist da:

http://blog.openstreetmap.de/blog/2018/03/wochennotiz-nr-399/

Viel Spaß beim Lesen!
___
Talk-at mailing list
Talk-at@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-at

Re: [Talk-cz] landuse v ceskych mestech

[J . Baláš]

Ok, dik za vysvětlení.
 Na mě to tedy při nižších (vzdálenějších) zoomech působí, že Praha je spíš
lesopark, než velkoměsto (viz to porovnani Prahy a Vídně), ale chyba v
datech (jak jsem si původně myslel) to tedy není.

Z toho se asi pomocí témat/stylů nijak "vylhat" nedá, chápu to dobře?

On Sat, 17 Mar 2018, 18:16 jzvc,  wrote:

> Cus,
>
> vysvetleni to ma celkem jednoduche
> https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4802231 takove veci se v ceskych
> podminkach nijak zvlaste neujaly, protoze ponekud postradaji smyslu,
> kdyz se mapuji jiz pomalu i jednotlive vetve na stromech ;D.
>
> Duvodu je vicero, ale kdyz se podivas jak je usporadane typicke mesto
> tak zjistis, ze by to trebas v te Praze znamenalo defakto zduplikovat
> informaci kterou uz v mape stejne mas - kde takova oblast je dovodis z
> toho, ze tam jsou obytne domy. Kdyz si kolem kazdeho udelas rekneme
> kolecko o polomeru 50m, ziskas pomerne slusnou aproximaci.
>
>
>
> Dne 17.3.2018 v 9:56 J. Baláš napsal(a):
> > Ahoj,
> > podilim se na vyvoji aplikace pro pg letani, ktera ted nove zobrazuje
> > openstreetmapy diky knihovne VTM.
> > Pri tvorbe tematu vhodneho pro letani jsme narazili na to, ze nektera
> > ceska mesta jsou "derava".
> > Mohl by mi to nekdo prosim ozrejmit? Mrknete prosim odsud dolu:
> >
> https://gitlab.com/xcontest-public/xctrack-public/issues/157#note_63532280
>  na
> > obrazky a k cemu jsme dospeli.
> >
> > Diky moc,
> >
> > Jarda
> > XContest team
> >
> > PS: prvni mail jsem posilal bez registrace a vypada, ze nedorazil, tak
> > zkousim jeste jednou po registraci
> >
> >
> > ___
> > Talk-cz mailing list
> > Talk-cz@openstreetmap.org
> > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-cz
> >
>
>
> ___
> Talk-cz mailing list
> Talk-cz@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-cz
>
___
Talk-cz mailing list
Talk-cz@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-cz

[Talk-ca] weeklyOSM #399 2018-03-06-2018-03-12

[weeklyteam]

The weekly round-up of OSM news, issue # 399,
is now available online in English, giving as always a summary of all things 
happening in the openstreetmap world:

http://www.weeklyosm.eu/en/archives/10131/

Enjoy!

weeklyOSM? 
who?: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WeeklyOSM#Available_Languages 
where?: 
https://umap.openstreetmap.fr/en/map/weeklyosm-is-currently-produced-in_56718#2/8.6/108.3
___
Talk-ca mailing list
Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca

semanarioOSM Nº 399 2018-03-06-2018-03-12

[weeklyteam]

Hola, el semanario Nº 399, el sumario de todo lo que está ocurriendo en el 
mundo de openstreetmap está en línea en *español*:

http://www.weeklyosm.eu/es/archives/10131/

¡Disfruta!

semanarioOSM? 
¿Dónde?: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WeeklyOSM#Available_Languages 
¿Quién?: 
https://umap.openstreetmap.fr/en/map/weeklyosm-is-currently-produced-in_56718#2/8.6/108.3
___
Talk-es mailing list
Talk-es@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-es

semanarioOSM Nº 399 2018-03-06-2018-03-12

[weeklyteam]

Hola, el semanario Nº 399, el sumario de todo lo que está ocurriendo en el 
mundo de openstreetmap está en línea en *español*:

http://www.weeklyosm.eu/es/archives/10131/

¡Disfruta!

semanarioOSM? 
¿Dónde?: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WeeklyOSM#Available_Languages 
¿Quién?: 
https://umap.openstreetmap.fr/en/map/weeklyosm-is-currently-produced-in_56718#2/8.6/108.3
___
Talk-cl mailing list
Talk-cl@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-cl

semanarioOSM Nº 399 2018-03-06-2018-03-12

[weeklyteam]

Hola, el semanario Nº 399, el sumario de todo lo que está ocurriendo en el 
mundo de openstreetmap está en línea en *español*:

http://www.weeklyosm.eu/es/archives/10131/

¡Disfruta!

semanarioOSM? 
¿Dónde?: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WeeklyOSM#Available_Languages 
¿Quién?: 
https://umap.openstreetmap.fr/en/map/weeklyosm-is-currently-produced-in_56718#2/8.6/108.3
___
Talk-cu mailing list
Talk-cu@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-cu

[OSM-talk-ie] weeklyOSM #399 2018-03-06-2018-03-12

[weeklyteam]

The weekly round-up of OSM news, issue # 399,
is now available online in English, giving as always a summary of all things 
happening in the openstreetmap world:

http://www.weeklyosm.eu/en/archives/10131/

Enjoy!

weeklyOSM? 
who?: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WeeklyOSM#Available_Languages 
where?: 
https://umap.openstreetmap.fr/en/map/weeklyosm-is-currently-produced-in_56718#2/8.6/108.3
___
Talk-ie mailing list
Talk-ie@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ie

[OSM-talk] weeklyOSM #399 2018-03-06-2018-03-12

[weeklyteam]

The weekly round-up of OSM news, issue # 399,
is now available online in English, giving as always a summary of all things 
happening in the openstreetmap world:

http://www.weeklyosm.eu/en/archives/10131/

Enjoy!

weeklyOSM? 
who?: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WeeklyOSM#Available_Languages 
where?: 
https://umap.openstreetmap.fr/en/map/weeklyosm-is-currently-produced-in_56718#2/8.6/108.3
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

[Talk-us] weeklyOSM #399 2018-03-06-2018-03-12

[weeklyteam]

The weekly round-up of OSM news, issue # 399,
is now available online in English, giving as always a summary of all things 
happening in the openstreetmap world:

http://www.weeklyosm.eu/en/archives/10131/

Enjoy!

weeklyOSM? 
who?: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WeeklyOSM#Available_Languages 
where?: 
https://umap.openstreetmap.fr/en/map/weeklyosm-is-currently-produced-in_56718#2/8.6/108.3
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us

[Talk-GB] weeklyOSM #399 2018-03-06-2018-03-12

[weeklyteam]

The weekly round-up of OSM news, issue # 399,
is now available online in English, giving as always a summary of all things 
happening in the openstreetmap world:

http://www.weeklyosm.eu/en/archives/10131/

Enjoy!

weeklyOSM? 
who?: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WeeklyOSM#Available_Languages 
where?: 
https://umap.openstreetmap.fr/en/map/weeklyosm-is-currently-produced-in_56718#2/8.6/108.3
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb

[talk-ph] weeklyOSM #399 2018-03-06-2018-03-12

[weeklyteam]

The weekly round-up of OSM news, issue # 399,
is now available online in English, giving as always a summary of all things 
happening in the openstreetmap world:

http://www.weeklyosm.eu/en/archives/10131/

Enjoy!

weeklyOSM? 
who?: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WeeklyOSM#Available_Languages 
where?: 
https://umap.openstreetmap.fr/en/map/weeklyosm-is-currently-produced-in_56718#2/8.6/108.3
___
talk-ph mailing list
talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph

[Talk-in] weeklyOSM #399 2018-03-06-2018-03-12

[weeklyteam]

The weekly round-up of OSM news, issue # 399,
is now available online in English, giving as always a summary of all things 
happening in the openstreetmap world:

http://www.weeklyosm.eu/en/archives/10131/

Enjoy!

weeklyOSM? 
who?: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WeeklyOSM#Available_Languages 
where?: 
https://umap.openstreetmap.fr/en/map/weeklyosm-is-currently-produced-in_56718#2/8.6/108.3
___
Talk-in mailing list
Talk-in@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-in

Re: [Talk-at] [Info] Invitation to ÖRK/MSF Mapathon Weltwassertag (fwd)

[gppes_osm]

> Für mich als Teilnehmer der Mailingliste ist das Forum aber ein später
> enstandenes Konkurrenzprodukt, das die Community spaltet.
> 

Sorry, das ist _bullshit_! Eine Community sollte zwei Kommunikationskanaele 
aushalten, die Spaltung erfolgt erst durch die Leute, die sich gegen einen der 
beiden verweigern.

Lg, Gppes

___
Talk-at mailing list
Talk-at@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-at