had the same troubles in firefox at some point. some tiles loaded some
didn't. other browser worked so it was clearly not server problem
Check the Content - Load images automatically settings, this solved my
troubles
On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 11:17 AM, Ivo van den Maagdenberg
ff has some shortcuts or gestures. clicking lot and fast and you won't
recognize the change in settings ...
On 18 Jun 2009, at 14:56 , Ivo van den Maagdenberg wrote:
2009/6/18 Apollinaris Schoell ascho...@gmail.com
had the same troubles in firefox at some point. some tiles loaded
some
not my tracks. I guess they are done with OSMTracker. It has lots of
onscreen buttons and you can assign any name to them. Or you enter any
custom text.
supports voice tracking too. very convenient to enter lots of wp or
when you need to concentrate on driving.
On 21 Jun 2009, at 19:32 ,
boundary=national_park
ownership=national
operator=United States National Park Service
or
operator=United States National Forest Service
operator=United States Bureau of Land Management
etc.
makes sense to use just one boundary tag. easier to implement in the
renderer and good enough
new josm versions have a sort button. it worked pretty well for me to
get all members sorted
On Jul 25, 2009, at 10:09 AM, Andrew Ayre wrote:
Hi, I have a problem with many of the recent relations I've created in
JOSM. In the past I didn't have a problem. Here is an example:
cryptic entries. What do they
mean and how do I change them, if needed?
Andy
Apollinaris Schoell wrote:
new josm versions have a sort button. it worked pretty well for me
to get all members sorted
On Jul 25, 2009, at 10:09 AM, Andrew Ayre wrote:
Hi, I have a problem with many of the recent
info is pretty old and not up to date. some rework is needed to make
it really useful . Include newer standards like relations, remove
some lengthy explanations about divided highways. remove or shrink
some of the large pictures to make it easier to read.
On Jul 26, 2009, at 9:17 AM,
Funnily enough, where I have been mapping the sign is always on the
bridge itself. Anyway, I think we should be tagging what the sign is
referring to, independent of the sign itself.
even if the sign is on the bridge structure it is a limitation valid
for the road passing under the bridge.
as far as I understand the db this is correct. the way uses the same nodes.
no need to increase the version the way doesn't have any additional location
info
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 10:31 AM, Andrew Ayre a...@britishideas.com wrote:
Hi,
I select a way with approx 2,000 nodes and move it in
I don't know what the Osmarender update speed is or how to mark
tiles as
dirty or find out when they were rendered, so I am unsure if
Osmarender
tiles can be directly compared.
osmarender doesn't work currently for large areas defined by relation
boundaries
there is a lonly white
As far as I have understood by reading English Wikipedia you have
different classes (Freeway, Interstate, Numbered Highways) where at
least Freeway and Interstate are motorways. Those seem to have
unambiguous signs. May I suppose that I would not be allowed to ride
my bike on any of these,
in
california is a good example. It changes from Primary or trunk to
motorway many times. mainly the northern part is open for bikes.
On Aug 4, 2009, at 6:56 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
2009/8/5 Apollinaris Schoell ascho...@gmail.com:
As far as I have understood by reading English
On Aug 7, 2009, at 12:44 AM, Mike Harris wrote:
Prefer
Landuse=forestry (not 'forest') and natural=woodland; maybe also a
tag for
the administrative areas such as US National Forests. Then other
tags can
take care of the detail.
some US National forests are nearly tree free. We
I know that some people like this tidy-points-function to work on
TIGER-Data, but I tell you: if the TIGER-Data is not good/precise, it
won't get better using this function ;-)
bad data doesn't get worse either. for a lot of tiger data it can compact
without any loss. And tiger is not a
while the Garmin ones can use OSM maps, the chips they are still using is
not
the newest and best
so it is harder to get a fix
My newest logger can actually get a fix inside my house, which was
constructed
with a near complete Faraday cage design, although a fix takes much longer
than
On Aug 9, 2009, at 2:23 PM, Liz wrote:
On Mon, 10 Aug 2009, Nop wrote:
Some people mentioned that the default settings of these tools are
very
agressive - this is true and a more lenient approach might produce
much
better results. But then, I have not seen any options to change
this
On Aug 10, 2009, at 4:32 AM, Tom Chance wrote:
Which do we go for? We can't have this stupid, unclear fudge.
Yes we can it's OSM it's anarchy :)
Regards,
Tom
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
+1
On Aug 10, 2009, at 6:51 AM, Nick Whitelegg wrote:
I'll say what I always say these days whenever this subject comes
up :-)
That is, I believe the highway tag should represent the physical
surface, not the rights. My current views on this are:
highway=track - a dirt/stone track,
On Aug 10, 2009, at 7:45 AM, Nop wrote:
Hi!
Apollinaris Schoell schrieb:
To prevent accidential damage, there could be a warning when you are
using it in a dangerous or most likely harmful way. E.g. more than
10
ways are selected or using it on ways that already have less than 10
My Garmin eTrex HCx makes reasonable tracks under forest cover,
although the tracks are certainly worse under forest than under a
clear
sky. It's not the cheapest GPS unit you can get, but it's reasonably
priced and it's a great navigator to enjoy both OSM and commercial
maps
on
.
Still like the Hcx because it's smaller and battery life is very important
on long hikes.
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 12:01 PM, Robert Scott li...@humanleg.org.ukwrote:
On Monday 10 August 2009, Apollinaris Schoell wrote:
compared to a SiRF III powered the eTrex is pretty lame in accuracy
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 4:20 PM, Liz ed...@billiau.net wrote:
On Tue, 11 Aug 2009, Apollinaris Schoell wrote:
compared to a SiRF III powered the eTrex is pretty lame in accuracy.
but it uses less power and runs twice as long on a set of batteries
ok, so I'm in the rich guys list.
not yet
perfect, only one thing to add.
more emails to talk will not change anything.
active mappers, the ones writing tools and renderers will
over time the better scheme will win or both stay in peaceful
coexistence.
On Aug 11, 2009, at 5:02 AM, Frederik Ramm wrote:
Hi,
David Earl wrote:
Up to
there is something better already
http://openstreetbugs.schokokeks.org/
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 3:34 PM, Morten Kjeldgaard m...@bioxray.au.dkwrote:
I realized when mapping today that it would be very useful to have a
set of OSM status POIs that you could use to mark the status of the
mapping
to recompile the map
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 6:42 AM, Someoneelse li...@mail.atownsend.org.ukwrote:
Apollinaris Schoell wrote:
there is something better already
http://openstreetbugs.schokokeks.org/
Is there a way of getting data out of that easily? If there is it would
make sense to be able
On Aug 20, 2009, at 7:56 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
2009/8/20 Peter Körner osm-li...@mazdermind.de:
Wmm why can't we say:
1L for the leftmost lane
2L for the second lane from left
1R for the rightmost lane
where left and right is seen in driving-direction. So then the 2
rightmode
There was a major change. you need to upgrade the plugin and the
settings for yahoo.
these are my current settings and they work on Mac OS
wmsplugin.default.html:http://josm.openstreetmap.de/wmsplugin/
YahooDirect.html?=true
wmsplugin.default.http://onearth.jpl.nasa.gov/wms.cgi?
, 2009, at 12:23 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
2009/8/20 Apollinaris Schoell ascho...@gmail.com:
how could you do this practically? aligning 18 lanes as individual
ways is impossible in the current data model and editors.
Why? It's very possible: just do it.
Btw: I's not 18 lanes, but
1
don't waste too much time trying to make sense of broken data. fix it
in the best possible way and delete tags which don't make sense
anymore. time of mappers is better spent on fixing the data instead of
fiddle around with nearly useless tags.
osm data is dynamic everyone can edit
you may add a visibility tag, if it's rough terrain also sac_scale may
apply
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:trail_visibility
On 26 Aug 2009, at 7:25 , Nick Whitelegg wrote:
I suppose this brings up all the stuff about path tagging again,
but, how
do people in general tag vague,
Oh no I would never want to write a tool that allow blind reverts! I'm
writing a tool that will
- make it easy to review all changes that reverting a changeset
will apply to the data
- visually show the data before/after the revert
- choose which change should be reverted in which way
I agree, maybe it's worth to have a fundraiser for a separate,
official mapnik server + super speedy hosting (unless the people
involved with UCL think that we can have a reliable enough connection
hosted free by UCL, or somebody else wants to offer reliable and free
hosting). Since it's
On 5 Sep 2009, at 8:40 , andrzej zaborowski wrote:
2009/9/5 Apollinaris Schoell ascho...@gmail.com:
I agree, maybe it's worth to have a fundraiser for a separate,
official mapnik server + super speedy hosting (unless the people
involved with UCL think that we can have a reliable enough
On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 7:10 PM, Richard Weait rich...@weait.com wrote:
On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 9:38 PM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com
wrote:
2009/9/21 Richard Weait rich...@weait.com:
[ ... ]
So I suggest we pattern on network=us_i for Interstates, us_us for US
Routes, us_ny_ny
On 20 Sep 2009, at 20:20 , John Smith wrote:
2009/9/21 Apollinaris Schoell ascho...@gmail.com:
you shouldn't use well established tags in the wrong way.
us_ny_ny_co is not
a network name. the network is I, US,
The US but is redundant, we just need to know what shield type
I don't recall seeing I and US on signs in the US, although it might
have been the case where I've been.
Verified on the way to work today. Even this is not consistent. Some shields
have some don't. At least in california.
the large overhead signs have only the number but the signs along the
This data is definitely very up-to-date. It is used by the county to
impose property taxes, so it has to be up-to-date. They offer new files
weekly.
problem is how can you convert the weekly updates into osm updates? You
can't delete all data and upload again the next week.
I basically
problem is how can you convert the weekly updates into osm updates? You
can't delete all data and upload again the next week.
I'm not volunteering to do it *weekly*, but I'd only delete and upload (or
modify) the data that changes, of course :).
great if you can do that. but be warned it
you might be shocked. I rarely add this info. many edits are a mix of
gps, yahoo tracing, best guess, averaging and interpolation with
other existing data, topo maps if free version available, free shape
files.
why would I add all this info? just a lot of work with no benefit. we
are not
But as I said, I'd much rather have a specific, rendered, more to do
here tag for stubs that is removed when the way is extended.
not a good idea for the normal map. have you ever seen any other commercial
map with hey look this map is incomplete BS info?
sure it makes sense to get this info
On Sat, Sep 26, 2009 at 11:15 AM, David Earl da...@frankieandshadow.comwrote:
On 26/09/2009 19:09, Apollinaris Schoell wrote:
But as I said, I'd much rather have a specific, rendered, more to do
here tag for stubs that is removed when the way is extended.
not a good idea for the normal
On Sat, Sep 26, 2009 at 5:38 PM, Dave F. dave...@madasafish.com wrote:
You see, this is where I get /really /confused
I see no reference to 'todo' or 'continue' in the general OSM wiki.
In the Groundtruth wiki page they're highlighted red, saying there there
no reference page.
If you think
please stop this Bot until it's usefulness is proven and others agree it
should run.
it was never discussed in this list and a bot affecting the whole planet
should be discussed first for risks.
On Sun, Sep 27, 2009 at 8:28 AM, Ruben Wisniewski ru...@all-in-si.dewrote:
Hi there,
just want to
yes this a critical point. also tiger import created 2 nodes for
railways/boundary/road/powerline crossing each other. even if the layer tag
is missing they must not merge. instead a layer tag must be added.
a bot can never solve such a problem. only make it worse.
On Sun, Sep 27, 2009 at 11:09
On 28 Sep 2009, at 10:06 , Ruben Wisniewski wrote:
I think the user speaks for itself, you can look at the history if you
want to know where the data came from. But I think there should be a
tag
like on the tiger data which indicates if the data was reviewed
locally,
to prove it is
are good. But I fear you
have destroyed a lot of tiger data this way. explanations are in a
couple of other mails.
again stop it.
since you mentioned #osm-de I assume you understand german Gut
gemeint ist das Gegenteil von gut
--
apo
Greetings Ruben
Apollinaris Schoell wrote:
please
On 30 Sep 2009, at 20:46 , Russ Nelson wrote:
Dave F. writes:
Russ Nelson wrote:
-1. Don't confuse anarchy with chaos. SteveC is our leader (and
should behave as such by Giving Advice), but he's only our leader so
far as he gives Good Advice.
A leader in an anarchic state? How does
yes he is a leader and as such deserves respect. he should lead some
useful and intelligent projects and don't loose a word about this
childish 1/0/yes/no/true/false discussions.
a consumer of the data has to do a bit more work but this is a small
fee for free access to an amazing database.
On 2 Oct 2009, at 21:06 , John Smith wrote:
You do if you want a consistent data set.
And what if I don't want?
There are 1000s of mappers and not everyone thinks like you and agrees
with you. If you can't accept so much freedom it's your problem not
mine or theirs.
there are many things I
On 4 Oct 2009, at 12:42 , Mike Harris wrote:
I'm seeking advice as to best practice in the following type of
situation:
As an increasingly common example, now that people are getting
around to mapping areas such as leisure=, natural= and landuse= ...
Consider the case of landuse=farm
On 4 Oct 2009, at 13:50 , MP wrote:
If you don't want to do micro mapping the best approach is to
create a
multipolygon relations for the farm and one for the golf course. use
the portion of the highway in the polygon as outer way and delete the
duplicate ways.
While this may look
On 3 Oct 2009, at 9:13 , Dave Hansen wrote:
Is this the most up to date way of keeping addresses?
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/House_numbers/Karlsruhe_Schema
yes and well supported by the renderer
Well, I have some perl code that will parse the 2007/2008
the interesting change is in US. No copyright info linking to Teleatlas.
Google is now it's own map provider. I was long awaiting this move.
With their data from Streetview they can extract nearly every
information from streetsigns and roadmarking.
But their data is still wrong in many places
can you move this thread to the new list where it belongs?
Hi all,
I'm pleased to announce a new mailing list: tagg...@openstreetmap.org .
You can subscribe at:
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
The mailing list description is tag discussion, strategy and related
tools.
isn't a good solution but it's the best we have for new
tags. old tags speak for themselves in tagwatch.
Having good docu in the wiki helps everyone and beginners will always
start from there.
Apollinaris Schoell writes:
can you move this thread to the new list where it belongs?
--
--my
I know it has been discussed before but found a lot of broken data created
by bot bugbuster and this is important enough to bring it up again.
There was some lame response but never really an explanation what this bot
is doing. Some edits are correct others are not.
There is little information in
On 11 Oct 2009, at 22:37 , Matthias Versen wrote:
Apollinaris Schoell wrote:
I know it has been discussed before but found a lot of broken data
created by bot bugbuster and this is important enough to bring it
up again.
There was some lame response but never really an explanation what
On 12 Oct 2009, at 24:05 , Frederik Ramm wrote:
Apo,
I don't know about the specific case you are talking about. But on
a more general note, I am sure that we will be seeing stricter rules
for bots, where instead of *politely asking* for things to be
discussed before the bot runs
On 13 Oct 2009, at 9:20 , SteveC wrote:
Dave - super awesome.
As I said on IRC the other week, but I'll repeat here for all - I
think dumping the addressing for all 3,000 counties and then letting
people import them one by one will be the best way to do it.
yes this is the best way to get
me too
also bay area
On 20 Oct 2009, at 21:00 , Dan Homerick wrote:
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 8:23 PM, SteveC st...@asklater.com wrote:
Neither list has any real traffic, and what they do tend to just be
reposts of talk-us.
Splitting the community at this stage is retarded, we should wait for
coastline update is slower and may take 1-2 weeks in Mapnik rendering. roads
are updated immediately. TAH should update quickly and you can use it for
checking.
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 3:47 PM, Joe Pranevich jpranev...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I'm trying to fix Hutchinson Island, Florida (
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 7:19 PM, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
On the other hand, putting the information directly on the way would
be problematic for many reasons. Ranges might span multiple ways, and
right/left has to be reversed whenever the way is reversed being the
most troublesome.
On 12 Nov 2009, at 8:28 , Ian Dees wrote:
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 10:20 AM, Apollinaris Schoell ascho...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 12 Nov 2009, at 6:14 , Andy Allan wrote:
I disagree there. It's much better to put the effort in during the
initial import, than to import things badly and try
On 12 Nov 2009, at 11:18 , Anthony wrote:
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 11:17 PM, Apollinaris Schoell
ascho...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 7:19 PM, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
It probably has to be a relation. Include a start node, an end
node,
and a list of one or more ways
On 12 Nov 2009, at 11:29 , Anthony wrote:
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 9:14 AM, Andy Allan gravityst...@gmail.com
wrote:
It's a fairly well established convention that in OSM it's the
houses/plots, not the road centrelines, that are addressed.
But that doesn't always reflect reality. The
follow the OSM principle.
map what's on the ground no matter where you are
On 12 Nov 2009, at 11:56 , Dave Hansen wrote:
On Thu, 2009-11-12 at 11:40 -0800, Apollinaris Schoell wrote:
On 12 Nov 2009, at 11:29 , Anthony wrote:
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 9:14 AM, Andy Allan gravityst...@gmail.com
TIGER is an incredibly huge data set. It comes from what may be the
most diverse set of primary sources of anything in the world short of
OSM itself.
It shouldn't be trusted explicitly (no single map should). Do you
have
some more constructive information about places where you've
I'm highly in favor of doing the import, regardless. I think the
inaccuracies will be far easier to fix than to put the addressing in
from scratch. I've done a lot of mapping in my area, but haven't
been willing to start doing addresses, even before I knew that the
TIGER import was
On 13 Nov 2009, at 23:56 , Dan Homerick wrote:
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 10:50 PM, Apollinaris Schoell ascho...@gmail.com
wrote:
I'm highly in favor of doing the import, regardless. I think the
inaccuracies will be far easier to fix than to put the addressing in
from scratch. I've
What really needs to be done for TIGER addresses import is match the
streets from TIGER to those in OSM (which should be easy since they
all still have the TIGER id's) and generate the address geometry based
on these. Otherwise someone will need to do all of the geometry
corrections that
On 14 Nov 2009, at 10:22 , Dave Hansen wrote:
On Fri, 2009-11-13 at 23:56 -0800, Dan Homerick wrote:
i, Nov 13, 2009 at 10:50 PM, Apollinaris Schoell ascho...@gmail.com
wrote:
I'm highly in favor of doing the import, regardless. I
think the inaccuracies
On 14 Nov 2009, at 18:05 , andrzej zaborowski wrote:
2009/11/15 Apollinaris Schoell ascho...@gmail.com:
matching Tiger id's is a very bad idea. you need to compare
geometries.
during edits ways are split, merged copied moved, deleted nodes
added node,
Most of these operations
On 16 Nov 2009, at 7:14 , Anthony wrote:
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 10:05 AM, Andy Allan gravityst...@gmail.com wrote:
I'd love to know which map has an
accurate pedestrian routing network that is collected as such and not
a derived interpretation of other base maps.
C'mon, this is the
On 16 Nov 2009, at 7:05 , Andy Allan wrote:
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 2:34 PM, Russ Nelson nel...@crynwr.com wrote:
Andy Allan writes:
On Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 6:22 PM, Dave Hansen d...@sr71.net wrote:
There are still quite a few squeaky wheels that
like to grumble about TIGER, but
below is some info from Garmin. Didn't help mine and Garmin exchanged
it. Was lucky enough it happend in the warranty. was already second
unit they changed for me.
Thank you for contacting Garmin International.
I will be happy to assist. The eTrex has a Boot-Block function that
will
you can try the splitter from mkmap project to split osm files in case
increasing the heap size is still not enough.
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 1:21 PM, Sam Vekemans
acrosscanadatra...@gmail.comwrote:
Thanks,
for my purposes right now, extending the memory heap size on the
command line with:
for osm the one of the best options is a PDA with OSMTracker
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Osmtracker
You can do voice recording, hot keys, pictures to enter POI. Can be
used while driving easily. JOSM supports the gpx with linked voice POI.
ideally used on a PDA with built in GPS.
pros:
full ack
some tags are too confusing ...
on a lighter note: from tagwatch
typo or protest against a very_horrible tag ;-)
smoothmess horrible (4), impassable (1)
On 30 Apr 2009, at 8:59 , Andy Allan wrote:
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 3:10 PM, Richard Mann
this will create many duplicates. You will need to do some checking
before a poi is added. so many mass imports are done cleanup is a lot
of work.
checking should be done against points, ways, polygons. in osm tags
are somtimes on building polugon or on a point. If we have both the
map is
available to OSM editors. One way to do that is to have a second API
which consists of a cached copy of everything that map renderers might
use, all merged into one read-only OSM-compatible api. So when
somebody asks to edit an area, the editor also shows them the read-
only elements, so
On 5 Dec 2009, at 20:03 , Ulf Lamping wrote:
Richard Weait schrieb:
I think the LWG has done a good job on a difficult task. A task that
we, as a community, asked them to do for us because we couldn't
implement a license change as a group of 20,000 (at the time)
individual mappers. I'm
Since some people feel about the vote like being held hostage with a gun
to their head somebody should solve their dilemma. Fork now and everybody
that might compelled to vote yes for fear to lose their data can vote no
and know they have a new project that has all the data but does not
On 6 Dec 2009, at 10:25 , Ulf Lamping wrote:
Apollinaris Schoell schrieb:
On 5 Dec 2009, at 20:03 , Ulf Lamping wrote:
I'm sorry, but for the last two years I can't remember asking for a license
change at all.
Sorry but this topic was many times on many lists, it's on the wiki. If you
Anthony wrote:
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 4:08 PM, Peteris Krisjanis pec...@gmail.com
wrote:
Anyway,
you can call him a troll, but I agree I so far haven't heard
sound arguments why CC-BY-SA "doesn't work" and what "work" actually
means. Doesn't work for Cloudmade?
I think you hit the nail
should be deleted then. Burning man follows a no trace policy. as
alternative it must be at least tagged different to disappear from maps.
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 11:44 AM, Kevin Samples ksamp...@uga.edu wrote:
It's the Burning Man Festival and it was recently a Featured Image on
the wiki.
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 4:28 PM, Dave F. dave...@madasafish.com wrote:
Hi Apollinaris
Apollinaris Schoell wrote:
should be deleted then.
Why?
We map what is on ground ( with some exceptions like boundaries)
Burning man follows a no trace policy.
Who says this why?
Burning man
On 18 Dec 2009, at 24:57 , Frederik Ramm wrote:
Hi,
Apollinaris Schoell wrote:
should be deleted then. Burning man follows a no trace policy.
I don't see why that should be relevant to us. China follows a no mapping
policy - do we care?
you have spent to much time on mapping
On 18 Dec 2009, at 24:42 , Peter Körner wrote:
there is no structure left behind for burning men. as soon as all is
removed map should show current status again.
keeping it in the database is ok but the tags need to reflect that there
is nothing left on ground
*I think* it should be
On 18 Dec 2009, at 3:51 , Mikel Maron wrote:
Of course, we now have a map with data shown past the end_date for the 2008
event. The most obvious option is tuning the renderers to data past it's end
date. There's downsides to that .. larger planet size, increased complexity
in
you can lad any gpx track and then load the geotagged pics with a right click
on the gpx layer. Josm will use the existing exif data and will not try to
match with gpx
On 29 Dec 2009, at 24:45 , Andre Hinrichs wrote:
Am Montag, den 28.12.2009, 23:50 +0100 schrieb Jeremy G:
Hi list,
I'm in
That isn't a North America extract, or even a US extract. It is a
collection of extracts by country for all except US/CA and a collection
of state/province extracts for the US and Canada. This is quite useful,
but it isn't an entire NA extract.
I remember an earlier comment that a NA
will do it, no conflicts detected in dry run
edit definitely looks destruction done by a newbie
please notify the user why this has been done and explain how to edit.
On 1 Feb 2010, at 21:54 , John Smith wrote:
I've forwarded a copy of your email to the main talk list, some people
have
I'm happy to use either method, but one of the reasons why I prefer the
1-relation-per-direction method is that it lets me quickly find areas that
need to be split into dual carriageways.
same for me, Josm has good support for sorting and relations and checking
for gaps. also the relation
On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 5:07 PM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.comwrote:
Why does there need to be 2 relations for this?
besides editing convenience a relation is directed and sorted since API 0.6
You can see it as a route to follow from start to end. For bus routes this
is a must. 2
what is wrong with 2 relations?
I didn't say 2 are needed but why do you think 2 is bad?
On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 5:38 PM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.comwrote:
On 9 February 2010 11:21, Apollinaris Schoell ascho...@gmail.com wrote:
besides editing convenience a relation is directed
On 8 Feb 2010, at 18:28 , John Smith wrote:
On 9 February 2010 12:20, Apollinaris Schoell ascho...@gmail.com wrote:
what is wrong with 2 relations?
I didn't say 2 are needed but why do you think 2 is bad?
It creates redundant data, and makes it easier to get conflicting data
if both
On 8 Feb 2010, at 20:03 , John Smith wrote:
On 9 February 2010 14:00, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes, all you are doing is coming up with work arounds to current
issues, the issues should be fixed properly.
Apart from the obvious you aren't uploading/download every single
slightly off topic,
one problem we have is many imports are incomplete because of network/server
interrupting the upload. Users stopping uploads but not being able to revert
them.
As a rule please report broken imports/uploads and someone can revert them
before manual changes make it nearly
On 16 Feb 2010, at 9:46 , Dave F. wrote:
John Smith wrote:
On 17 February 2010 01:40, John F. Eldredge j...@jfeldredge.com wrote:
Frequently you can't get a position fix at all, if the building has much
metal in its structure. I can't get a position fix from inside my house
unless I am
openstreetbugs is basically there but has a crappy UI. It needs to be
1) click 'feedback' or 'problem'
2) enter problem
3) click ok
ok and then? who will pick it up and fix it?
look at openstreetbugs and most could be closed right away. the feedback from
most people is useless. a
1 - 100 von 330 matches
Mail list logo
