On Thu, 2009-02-05 at 21:16 +1030, Darrin Smith wrote:
Futher to this I was looking back through this thread (thinking maybe
about having a look at the data myself) and I James said:
It's described as These boundaries have been based upon localities
gazetted by the Geographic Place name
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 9:23 PM, Cameron
osm-mailing-li...@justcameron.comwrote:
How much do suburbs change anyway? Perhaps any changes could simply be
introduced manually.
~Cameron
I suspect this is true, changing large numbers of suburbs sounds unlikely.
If we had suddenly had
a new set of
On Thu, 05 Feb 2009 20:23:07 +1030
Jack Burton j...@saosce.com.au wrote:
Consider two suburbs, A B, whose boundary is currently defined by a
river. Now let's say that by the time the next ABS update occurs, that
boundary has changed, and a small part of what used to be suburb A has
become
On Thu, 5 Feb 2009 20:53:01 +1030
Cameron osm-mailing-li...@justcameron.com wrote:
How much do suburbs change anyway? Perhaps any changes could simply be
introduced manually.
~Cameron
Yeah I did think that might be an easier solution, I was addressing
automatic updates because jackb brought
4 matches
Mail list logo
