On 22 July 2010 14:55, {Tim} m526244+osm...@gmail.com wrote:
I, obviously, agree. This situation (speed limits in either direction
bearing no relation to one another) is perhaps more common than you
realise. and upon further thought, apart from trivial cases why should
it not be so?
The
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 2:21 PM, Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 12:42 PM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com
wrote:
I just want more people to contribute maxspeed information to make
routing more useful, and if people see maxspeed tags everywhere I was
How do you tag a winery? I tried tourism=winery but that doesn't render.
I guess shop=alcohol would render, but that's not really the correct tag.
- Ben
I have put them in as tourism=attraction, back in the days when i found a
tag and misused it or altered it to fit reality.
They are a
On 22 July 2010 16:24, Simon Biber simonbi...@yahoo.com.au wrote:
To indicate specifically that it is a winery, perhaps you could introduce a
sub-category like shop=alcohol, alcohol=winery.
Some people might think alcohol=* would be used for tagging products
rather than purpose...
What about
Sam just sent me this link:
http://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/University_of_Canberra/RCC_Canberra
It's a wiki unconference:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recent_Changes_Camp
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
On 21 July 2010 05:36, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm not sure how complete it is, but there is a list of data sets and
the licenses:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Catalog
If there are any known entries missing, please add them.
LWG has put out a request for
Hi.
Yes I'm thinking that tourism=attraction is probably the most appropriate
tag, in that I'm probably interested in the winery due to tourism rather
than commerce.
If there is also a restaurant there I'd probably tag that separately.
As before, note that a vineyard is a different thing to a
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 11:50 PM, ed...@billiau.net wrote:
On 21 July 2010 05:36, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm not sure how complete it is, but there is a list of data sets and
the licenses:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Catalog
If there are any
On 23 July 2010 00:08, 80n 80n...@gmail.com wrote:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Catalog
*snip*
Grant
What's the lower limit for inclusion on this list? It says rather vaguely
more than a few hundred nodes.
80n
Those that imported the data, they make the decision. We have
On 23 July 2010 06:41, Ben Kelley ben.kel...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes I'm thinking that tourism=attraction is probably the most appropriate
tag, in that I'm probably interested in the winery due to tourism rather
than commerce.
Not all places that sell wine in this fashion make their own wine,
It looks like it's half a military airfield and half a commercial
airport and I've sort of split it up with a couple of relations but
I'm not entirely sure what I've done accurately describes the
situation.
Is anyone familiar with Wagga airport able to comment further on the situation?
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 1:46 PM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.comwrote:
It looks like it's half a military airfield and half a commercial
airport and I've sort of split it up with a couple of relations but
I'm not entirely sure what I've done accurately describes the
situation.
Is
On 23 July 2010 14:39, Babstar babsta...@gmail.com wrote:
Check out this link:
http://www.airservices.gov.au/publications/current/ersa/FAC_YSWG_3-Jun-2010.pdf
it may give you some more guidance.
Thanks for that, it shows the airport split up more or less how I
split the mutipolygon relations,
On Fri, 23 Jul 2010 14:39:05 +1000
Babstar babsta...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 1:46 PM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.comwrote:
It looks like it's half a military airfield and half a commercial
airport and I've sort of split it up with a couple of relations but
I'm not
On 23 July 2010 15:13, Ross Scanlon i...@4x4falcon.com wrote:
Not really usable as they are copyright.
It was useful as confirmation, rather than copying...
The airport is joint RAAF civil, when I worked there in 1986 the division was
the edge of the apron between the control tower building
On 23 July 2010 15:13, Ross Scanlon i...@4x4falcon.com wrote:
Not really usable as they are copyright.
It was useful as confirmation, rather than copying...
Useful information for anyone else considering using them as well then.
I had no idea what to tag those as, and there was nothing
On Fri, 23 Jul 2010 15:24:53 +1000
John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
something else... Also I marked the RAAF taxiway etc as
access=military although access=private might be more accurate since
you can get permission to transit according the PDF...
Only if your a civil aircraft on
17 matches
Mail list logo
