On 22 April 2011 13:43, Elizabeth Dodd wrote:
> The logical reason for a relation is that there are numerous parts to
> the transponders at various heights and that there are several per
> aerial mast / comms hut
> Perhaps the wiki page needs a rewrite?
I thought the wiki page was added to about
On Fri, 22 Apr 2011 13:31:22 +1000
Gary Gallagher wrote:
> Hi,
>I've been editing some areas of rural Victoria and I keep coming
> across communications transponders that have been mis-tagged as
> relations. in the .osm file the xml looks like this:-
>
>timestamp='2010-05-22T23:46:04Z' u
Hi,
I've been editing some areas of rural Victoria and I keep coming
across communications transponders that have been mis-tagged as
relations. in the .osm file the xml looks like this:-
I'm not sure about some of the tags but f
On 21 April 2011 05:05, 4x4falcon wrote:
> Completed.
>
> Please check the area as I don't know what should be there.
>
This isn't the only large scale delete by new user within minutes of signing up.
Recent example in the UK: http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/7907122
Best we keep a
4 matches
Mail list logo