[talk-au] Question about relations

etc that are lost to OSM. I don't know if it still possible to better use some of this unattached data in the database down the track. Ian -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-au/attachments/20120725

Re: [talk-au] Question about relations

Adrian Plaskitt wrote: My specific question is, when the route passes down only part of a way, say just a few blocks of a longer street, how do you assign the relation to just a few internodes. Is it necessary to split the ways at the nodes and then just assign the relation to the segments

Re: [talk-au] Redaction recovery

Don't worry too much about the Hume, it's almost fixed as far as i can tell. I think I fixed the last issue affecting routing between Melbourne and Sydney tonight. (hopefully) South west sydney is full of broken roads. I'm not too familiar with central Sydney but if a local could take a look,

Re: [talk-au] Question about relations

On 25/07/12 16:07, Adrian Plaskitt wrote: Greetings all. I usually confine my mapping to bush tracks and cycle paths as this is what I am most interested in and is often not available from other sources. With the recent devastation of the base map I am remapping some of my local area, and

Re: [talk-au] relations

Thanks, fellas, I had worried that splitting ways would cause trouble with route finding etc as one street would become 2 adjoining streets with the same name. Regards, adrian From: talk-au-requ...@openstreetmap.org Subject: Talk-au Digest, Vol 61, Issue 34 To: talk-au@openstreetmap.org