[talk-au] dirt roads - a summary

2012-10-22 Thread David Bannon
Hi Folks, a summary of discussion on dirt roads before I hack at the discussion tab of Australian_Road_Tagging. Seems to me two issues not completely clear - 1. Nathan sees all cases of highway=track implying 4x4 required. I don't really agree, the dynamic range in this space is just too tight,

Re: [talk-au] dirt roads - a summary

2012-10-22 Thread Ian Sergeant
On 23 October 2012 11:09, David Bannon dban...@internode.on.net wrote: 2. Ian likes the idea that tracks or unsealed roads can be marked 4x4_only=no if someone has done a survey and decided that's appropriate. Particularly in places where there may be some assumption that the tracks are often

Re: [talk-au] dirt roads - a summary

2012-10-22 Thread Mark Pulley
On 23/10/2012, at 11:09 AM, David Bannon wrote: 1. Nathan sees all cases of highway=track implying 4x4 required. I don't really agree, the dynamic range in this space is just too tight, we need to use 'track' on roads that are both 4x4 and not 4x4. Thats what 4x4_only tag is for. Whats the

Re: [talk-au] dirt roads - a summary

2012-10-22 Thread John Henderson
On 23/10/12 15:42, Mark Pulley wrote: Over the last few years I have added many tracks that are definitely drivable with a 2-wheel drive (the vast majority added using the GPS trace from my 2-wheel drive car). 4x4 required should definitely not be implied by highway=track. Seconded, from