Hi Folks, a summary of discussion on dirt roads before I hack at the
discussion tab of Australian_Road_Tagging. Seems to me two issues not
completely clear -
1. Nathan sees all cases of highway=track implying 4x4 required. I
don't really agree, the dynamic range in this space is just too tight,
On 23 October 2012 11:09, David Bannon dban...@internode.on.net wrote:
2. Ian likes the idea that tracks or unsealed roads can be marked
4x4_only=no if someone has done a survey and decided that's appropriate.
Particularly in places where there may be some assumption that the tracks
are often
On 23/10/2012, at 11:09 AM, David Bannon wrote:
1. Nathan sees all cases of highway=track implying 4x4 required. I don't
really agree, the dynamic range in this space is just too tight, we need to
use 'track' on roads that are both 4x4 and not 4x4. Thats what 4x4_only tag
is for. Whats the
On 23/10/12 15:42, Mark Pulley wrote:
Over the last few years I have added many tracks that are definitely
drivable with a 2-wheel drive (the vast majority added using the GPS
trace from my 2-wheel drive car). 4x4 required should definitely not
be implied by highway=track.
Seconded, from
4 matches
Mail list logo