A simple example starting with my own house - how should residential
buildings be tagged?
The block they sit on is more of a land use concern, but the specific
buildings don't occupy the entire block - and seem like they should be
tagged house.
Is this a correct way to go about things? The goal
From: Will Rouesnel [mailto:w.roues...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 05, 2013 1:34 AM
To: talk-au@openstreetmap.org
Subject: [talk-au] Adding residential properties?
A simple example starting with my own house - how should residential
buildings be tagged?
The block they sit on is
Hi again,
There has been a response from TMR and the necessary permission has been
obtained (for their datasets
accessiblehttps://data.qld.gov.au/organizationon the
data.qld.gov.au portal). I have an administrative query to be cleared by
TMR before I make any amendments to the Wiki.
Its a start
I started out with buildings, but got a bit excited in my local area;
getting down into trees, power lines, fences, driveways etc.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/-34.84928/138.52277
Not super pretty looking.
Nowdays, I tend to map the primary houses only, and perhaps significant
features
I'd suggest you read these wiki pages:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Addresses
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Address
My personal opinion is that the address should be on a separate node at
the entrance to the property. This is preferred for disability access
programs.
It also
Hi folks,
I'm at a bit of a loss right now and wonder if any of you have experienced
the same issue.
For about a week on 2 different machines I have only had access to zoom
level 19.
I've pretty much run down every google result possible (remove tile cache,
remove attribution file et al) and
Hi Will,
I’ve been mapping the building outlines and tagging the feature appropriately,
e.g. house and then adding address data to each building. I’ve also added in a
smaller area the boundary fences or walls. There is I understand, two competing
models for recording addresses, one where the
Hi Jason,
There seems to be two layers in Bing in South Australia. A high resolution
three or four year old layer and a lower resolution layer only about twelve
months old. This may be related to what you are seeing.
On 6 Dec 2013, at 9:29 am, Jason Ward jasonjwa...@gmail.com wrote:
For
Hi Alex,
The age is an interesting point but not what I am experiencing I think. As
an example, and to your point, I accept that the Higher Resolution imagery
is older than the lower resolution imagery. My house roof solar panels
installed in June 2011 are there in the Low res images. When I
Jason Ward wrote:
Extra / New Info. The OSM iD (in-browser) editor is also not showing
the Bing Hi res images (so its not just me!) Something has happened
recently. I'd be interested to here from other BNE mappers because I
am confuzzled.
Not just Australia either - someone on IRC
Ah. Okay. I'll jump on a few more IRC channels and keep an eye out then.
Thanks Andy.
Cheers,
Jason
On 6 December 2013 10:50, SomeoneElse li...@mail.atownsend.org.uk wrote:
Jason Ward wrote:
Extra / New Info. The OSM iD (in-browser) editor is also not showing the
Bing Hi res images
Its a bit of a stretch but they could be scaling back high load services
(ie. High Res map tiles) to non Bing products to ensure their 3D Maps
release runs buttering smooth.
http://www.bing.com/blogs/site_blogs/b/search/archive/2013/12/05/maps3d.aspx
but
in this day and age that'd be an
12 matches
Mail list logo
