Re: [talk-au] Inappropriate tagged areas

2015-12-16 Thread Andrew Davidson
You're not likely to get much of a response from the editors you contacted. The Barrington Tops boundary was drawn in by a user that hasn't edited for 5 years. http://osm.mapki.com/history/way.php?id=25968044 An the Myall edits about 2 years old. The Blue Mountains boundary dates back to

Re: [talk-au] Inappropriate tagged areas

2015-12-16 Thread Warin
On 17/12/2015 8:35 AM, Ben Kelley wrote: Hi. I thought natural=wood was for trees that had not been planted for the purpose of forestry. landuse=forest is where they were planted for forestry. +1 Use is not consistent. Situation normal. (If you harvest the natural trees, which one

[talk-au] Inappropriate tagged areas

2015-12-16 Thread Warin
Hi ... I'm using LPI to tag National Park and State Forest boundaries and came across some large "Inappropriately tagged areas". Way 25968044tagged as Barrington Tops National Park, this area includes National Parks, State Conservation Areas, State Forests. Way 232137774 tagged as Myall State

Re: [talk-au] Inappropriate tagged areas

2015-12-16 Thread Ben Kelley
Hi. I thought natural=wood was for trees that had not been planted for the purpose of forestry. landuse=forest is where they were planted for forestry. Use is not consistent. (If you harvest the natural trees, which one is it?) See the Forest page on the wiki, but landcover=trees seems

Re: [talk-au] Inappropriate tagged areas

2015-12-16 Thread Andrew Harvey
+1 for separating out landcover and administrative boundaries into separate ways. In practice it's often a good approximation to simply combine these, however once you want more accurate data they'll need to be separated out. On 17 December 2015 at 08:24, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote: >

[talk-au] gmail users suspended..

2015-12-16 Thread Ian Sergeant
Hi, mailman seems to have just suspended all gmail subscribers from this list. Seems to have been response to gmail deciding to bounce some yahoo original emails. Anyway, for now I've turned off mailman bounce processing. But 50-odd members will have to reconfirm their membership. Thanks, Ian.