Re: [talk-au] Talk-au Digest, Vol 107, Issue 2

oncerned > with the country side, rather than the messy cities. :-) > > Are there any objections/comment/other ideas to the above ? > > - > > I have read the past posts on this ... > > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-au/2008-December/0010

Re: [talk-au] place=? An oldie but no past conclusion.

On 4/05/2016 12:50 AM, Christopher Barham wrote: On 03 May 2016, at 14:22, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com > wrote: Why judge on the population? Larger populations get more services - Police, Medical, Education ... they go hand in hand. Populations are usually

Re: [talk-au] place=? An oldie but no past conclusion.

>From what you have written, I think you are probably right to change classificaiton of Quobba Station to village rather than town. In regard to smaller rural centres, I have also been wondering about classifications. In South Australia, some rural properties constitute their own official

Re: [talk-au] place=? An oldie but no past conclusion.

> On 03 May 2016, at 14:22, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Why judge on the population? > Larger populations get more services - Police, Medical, Education ... they go > hand in hand. > Populations are usually stated - on the entry signs to towns, villages .. and > collected

[talk-au] place=? An oldie but no past conclusion.

Hi, I came across Quobba Station and Canarvon where Canarvon is a 'village' and Quobba Station is a 'town'. I know Canarvon is larger than Quobba Station! So I re-tagged Quobba Station as 'village'. But I wondered on it.. so looked up the OSMwiki .. not much help... the Australian tagging

[talk-au] place=? and oldie but a goodie.

Hi, I came across Quobba Station and Canarvon where Canarvon is a 'village' and Quobba Station is a 'town'. I know Canarvon is larger than Quobba Station! So I re-tagged Quobba Station as 'village'. But I wondered on it.. so looked up the OSMwiki .. not much help... the Australian tagging