Re: [talk-au] Am I doing intersections right?

On 28/04/18 14:01, Andrew Harvey wrote: So it should be what the road signs say +1 The intent of the destination tag appears to be allowing routers to say "follow the signs to ". ___ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org

Re: [talk-au] Am I doing intersections right?

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:destination says: In the road system, the key destination=* describes the content of > signposts or ground writing indicating the names of the locations that the > tagged way is heading to. Thus navigation systems can refer to road signs > that the driver

Re: [talk-au] Am I doing intersections right?

Would it depend on the router & how it gives the name? (Voice nav is turned off on mine, so I don't know!) Will it tell you, "Turn left into Whatever St" or will it be "Turn left towards Whichever suburb" Thanks Graeme On 28 April 2018 at 12:20, Joel H. wrote: > I

Re: [talk-au] Am I doing intersections right?

I guess now my question is, do we need better definitions of the usage of the destination tag? I saw back on that North Lakes intersection linked before (https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/-27.24180/153.02459). That we had the destination= tag filled with the Suburb. Shouldn't this be the road

Re: [talk-au] Investigating a NSW Schools Import

I've received some feedback from the imports list and made some changes to the plan. 1. The ref tags won't be imported as they can in some instances discourage local edits. They make the object feel less like a native OSM object and editors may feel it's a special imported piece of data that they