Re: [talk-au] "Hidden" National Park boundary

2019-04-22 Thread Graeme Fitzpatrick
Solved!!! (& I'm an idiot! :-() Just realised that I had previously selected to hide boundaries, to stop admin boundaries cluttering up the screen while doing things. Switched boundaries back on, refreshed & there you are! So, today's new thing that I have learned is that "boundaries" are all

Re: [talk-au] "Hidden" National Park boundary

2019-04-22 Thread Graeme Fitzpatrick
Thanks everyone! You convinced me not to try to move the boundary! I'm tempted to do as you suggest Warin & delete the natural=wood cover for the whole area, then re-do it just for the actual tree coverage, which would / should then make the other details visible. But I still can't "see" the

Re: [talk-au] "Hidden" National Park boundary

2019-04-22 Thread Warin
The national park way 104759342 is tagged natural=wood this will probably cover any other land cover tags you add under the national park. Delete the tag natural=wood for the national park way - as I have done for various national parks and you can then add the land covers without getting