Re: [talk-au] Help needed with OSM Inspector error

On Jan 4, 2022, at 3:51 PM, Graeme Fitzpatrick wrote: > On Mon, 3 Jan 2022 at 16:51, stevea wrote: > But it is a bit better than it was five minutes ago. > > & has now disappeared from Inspector, so you obviously did something right :-) > > I'll also leave the bus route relation to somebody

Re: [talk-au] Help needed with OSM Inspector error

On Mon, 3 Jan 2022 at 16:51, stevea wrote: > But it is a bit better than it was five minutes ago. > & has now disappeared from Inspector, so you obviously did something right :-) I'll also leave the bus route relation to somebody who knows what they're doing! Thanks Graeme

Re: [talk-au] US Trails Working Group

Hi, On 04.01.22 12:29, Warin wrote: > I have not as yet looked at hospitals, nor post offices... and I think both > of them are more useful to the map than Rural Fire Brigades. Within the envelope of stuff that is admissible to OSM, usefulness is a very subjective concept. If you are in the

Re: [talk-au] US Trails Working Group

On 3/1/22 10:59 pm, stevea wrote: Mmm, mostly, I’d say, Warin. But let’s be careful not to encourage “only what my use cases are” too much. When you say “if it cannot be seen from a public, customer or permissive place then I don't really care to map it,” I ask for caution with this sort