Hey Graeme,
Apologies; error in the email!
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Projects [1]
Dian
On 2022-04-07 04:10, Graeme Fitzpatrick wrote:
Looking good, thanks, Dian.
On Thu, 7 Apr 2022 at 13:20, Dian Ågesson wrote:
Hello list,
* New Project Pages have been created
Looking good, thanks, Dian.
On Thu, 7 Apr 2022 at 13:20, Dian Ågesson wrote:
> Hello list,
>
>
>- New Project Pages have been created (
>https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Projects).,
>
> Returns:
Australian Projects)
There is currently no text in this page.
?
Thanks
Hello list,
Cleanup has been steadily progressing for Australian OSM Wiki pages.
* New Project Pages have been created
(https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Projects).,
* The Australia page has a new look, and outdated information has been
removed
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Map_what.27s_on_the_ground
on the ground should come first unless it's a typo (yes street signs
sometimes have typos) and other names in use as the alt_name.
On Thu, 7 Apr 2022 at 07:11, Bob Cameron wrote:
> This might have been covered before..
Tony
I don’t understand why you have taken it upon yourself to have to verify other
edits.
OSM data relies on being verifiable.
You and I recently both visited the same area / way, as I made a correction to
incorrect data from a previous mapper. The Mapillary data you provided as part
of
This might have been covered before..
What is the consensus on precedence of alt_names, more for roads and
waterways.
Example, I sometimes come across (NSW) creek name formal signs that are
quite different from what is shown on the DCS overlays. Is the primary
name the "on the ground" one
Hi Sebastian and list
I went out to Changeset: 118627943 and took photos. It is my belief
that a short section of bike route through park should be cycleway.
Sebastian disagrees, his changeset comment follows.
Comment from HighRouleur about 5 hours ago
From the Mapillary info provided,
7 matches
Mail list logo
