Re: [talk-au] Question about using NSW Speed Zone Data in OSM

2024-02-11 Thread Andrew Harvey
No objections from me. They haven't responded yet, and from everything we can tell they imported the data without any other cross checks and didn't follow the import guidelines. On Sun, 11 Feb 2024 at 22:00, Mark Pulley wrote: > I’ve got some spare time (having caught up with the surveys from

Re: [talk-au] Deletion of informal paths by NSW NPWS

2024-02-11 Thread forster
Hi Its OK by me. The park ranger who appears to be most connected to this has been contacted and invited into our discussion. What more can we do? Its unfortunatee that a slow motion edit war will be the likely outcome. Tony In that case, should I go ahead now with the revert? Mark P.

Re: [talk-au] Deletion of informal paths by NSW NPWS

2024-02-11 Thread Mark Pulley
In that case, should I go ahead now with the revert? Mark P. > On 9 Feb 2024, at 6:23 am, fors...@ozonline.com.au wrote: > > No, nothing that I have heard. > Tony > > >> Just following up on this - has there been any further input from National >> Parks regarding these paths? >> >> Mark P.

Re: [talk-au] Question about using NSW Speed Zone Data in OSM

2024-02-11 Thread Mark Pulley
I’ve got some spare time (having caught up with the surveys from my last holidays), so I can go through these and revert them. Any objections? Mark P. > On 9 Feb 2024, at 9:57 am, Andrew Harvey wrote: > > We do have permissions to use this data it's listed in >