Re: [talk-au] Deletion of informal paths by NSW NPWS

It's been a couple of months, and Gaia has now refreshed its tiles based on the updates I made for Kanangra. The informal tracks are now rendered with significantly less priority than the formal tracks. I should have taken a screenshot of before, but I didn't. The formal tracks look to be the

Re: [talk-au] SA House Numbers

Hi Bryce, Of those datasets, the City of Adelaide one appears to be the only one containing house numbers with some kind of geographical reference, so it's got some potential for an import if someone has the time to go through it. The roads dataset doesn't include house numbers, and the

[talk-au] SA House Numbers

Hi All, I'm new(ish) to OSM and want to contribute house numbers for South Australia. None exist and it makes it hard to use mobile apps that use OSM data (there are work arounds). OSM only has street names for SA. What format or data is needed? Where do I send it? As a starting point, Data

Re: [talk-au] Deletion of informal paths by NSW NPWS

Ben, On 23/04/2024 05:22, Ben Ritter wrote: Our solution involves extra work to accommodate the atypical workflow of NPWS deleting paths as a means of communicating their updated access rights. You're very generous towards NPWS with your wording here; some might call that "atypical

Re: [talk-au] Deletion of informal paths by NSW NPWS

Hi Sebastian Thanks for your input but I am not sure what you mean. Can you give a bit more detail please? Tony Please don?t use Strava as your reference as to whether access is permitted on a specific way as a lot of people do the wrong thing. On 23 Apr 2024, at 4:25?PM,

Re: [talk-au] Deletion of informal paths by NSW NPWS

Please don’t use Strava as your reference as to whether access is permitted on a specific way as a lot of people do the wrong thing. > On 23 Apr 2024, at 4:25 PM, fors...@ozonline.com.au wrote: > > Quoting Ben Ritter : > > ... >> *Which publications are distributing maps of the areas in

Re: [talk-au] Deletion of informal paths by NSW NPWS

Quoting Ben Ritter : *Which publications are distributing maps of the areas in question that are encouraging use of paths tagged with `access=no`?* I am interested in collecting any and all examples. Not sure about this one but Way: Road 30 (569541638) access=no Edited 10 months ago by VicWM

Re: [talk-au] Deletion of informal paths by NSW NPWS

Quoting Ben Ritter : ... *Which publications are distributing maps of the areas in question that are encouraging use of paths tagged with `access=no`?* I am interested in collecting any and all examples. Hi Ben Strava seems to be not respecting private.