On Mon, 2009-08-03 at 23:37 +1000, Nick Hocking wrote:
Apart from Victoria and Albert does anyone know of an example
where
A Husband and Wife have both had roads named after them and that these
roads intersect.
At the risk of seeming obvious, a more modern example: Elizabeth Way
deficiency in the method most mappers are
using to map un-named ways (although of course, as Darrin pointed out,
those roundabouts [or link roads] that _do_ have names in the real world
should of course be named in OSM too).
Just my 2c worth...
Regards,
Jack Burton
j...@saosce.com.au
On Thu, 2009-02-05 at 21:16 +1030, Darrin Smith wrote:
Futher to this I was looking back through this thread (thinking maybe
about having a look at the data myself) and I James said:
It's described as These boundaries have been based upon localities
gazetted by the Geographic Place name
On Thu, 2009-02-05 at 14:26 +1100, Franc Carter wrote:
I just had a conversation with a really helpful person at the ABS.
She indicated that the ABS is taking a view of the data that is very
similar/compatible with (at least my understanding) the view that
OpenStreetMap is taking towards the
On Mon, 2009-01-19 at 16:23 +1100, Patrick Jordan wrote:
This is fairly definitive:
http://www.copyright.org.au/pdf/acc/infosheets_pdf/G090.pdf/view?searchterm=maps
maps remain in copyright until 70 years after the creator's death.
Umm, doesn't that mean that the 1940 vintage street
On Mon, 2009-01-12 at 17:06 +1030, Darrin Smith wrote:
[On the single area option]
Personally I think that is still the best approach (the only downside
I can see with it would be if a suburb was not defined by a closed
area - although I'd imagine that would be quite rare). However,
On Sun, 2008-03-09 at 18:37 +1100, Stuart Robinson wrote:
Links are by default oneway, I think that's what the other person is
getting at.
Ah, I didn't realise that. I don't think most of the ways in question
should be oneway, i.e. they allow both turning right from the (dual
carriageway)
7 matches
Mail list logo
