You point out the problem with this:
tracktype is ignored on everything except highway=track
You would have to modify this in the rendering anyway.
As 4wd_only can apply to any highway= tag it is more appropriate.
From memory this was part of the original discussion when 4wd_only was
Folks, you have every right to call me fickle. But maybe we need to
be realistic ? This is a follow up to the discussion about advice that
appears on Australian_Tagging_Guidelines and a programme to see better
default rendering of dirt and 4x4 roads.
Firstly, I approve of the 4wd_only tag, I
unmade modes. Sigh
But yes, the current descriptions of tracktype are pretty much
English country gardens, but thats something we can work on.
David
- Original Message -
From: David Bannon
To:, , David Bannon
Cc:
Sent:Sun, 28 Oct 2012 13:48:28 +1030
Subject:Re: [talk-au] 4wd_only
Final tally was 12 yes v 9 no so it passed.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:4wd_only%3Dyes
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
http://maps.bigtincan.com/?zoom=18lat=-26.191806577279lon=152.62008508749
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
On Thu, 13 Aug 2009, John Smith wrote:
Has anyone discussed the appropriateness of using the
4wd_only nomenclature?
It seems a bit Australia(NZ?) specific. Maybe that is why
Is also in at least Iceland.
there is so much
opposition. Seems the Wiki proposal is losing the vote.
It
--- On Thu, 13/8/09, Liz ed...@billiau.net wrote:
there are some things that are best done by action rather
than talk
and 4wd_only os one of them.
we make a decision
we go ahead
There needs to be another 3 votes to meet the current minimum standard of 15
votes, so far there is 7 for and 5
On Fri, 14 Aug 2009, John Smith wrote:
--- On Thu, 13/8/09, Liz ed...@billiau.net wrote:
there are some things that are best done by action rather
than talk
and 4wd_only os one of them.
we make a decision
we go ahead
There needs to be another 3 votes to meet the current minimum
Where is the Wiki ?
2009/8/14 Jason Stirk jst...@oobleyboo.com
Voted
2009/8/14 Elizabeth Dodd ed...@billiau.net
On Fri, 14 Aug 2009, John Smith wrote:
--- On Thu, 13/8/09, Liz ed...@billiau.net wrote:
there are some things that are best done by action rather
than talk
and
John Smith delta_foxt...@... writes:
--- On Wed, 5/8/09, b.schulz...@...
b.schulz...@... wrote:
Otherwise 4wd_only=yes could mean any road which is
signposted as 4wd_only, regardless of legality.
If it's signed on a public road sign it most likely is legally enforced since
you would
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 10:34 AM, BlueMMbluemm1975-...@yahoo.com wrote:
Has anyone discussed the appropriateness of using the 4wd_only nomenclature?
It seems a bit Australia(NZ?) specific. Maybe that is why there is so much
opposition. Seems the Wiki proposal is losing the vote.
What about
--- On Wed, 12/8/09, BlueMM bluemm1975-...@yahoo.com wrote:
Has anyone discussed the appropriateness of using the
4wd_only nomenclature?
It seems a bit Australia(NZ?) specific. Maybe that is why
Is also in at least Iceland.
there is so much
opposition. Seems the Wiki proposal is losing the
John Smith wrote:
While it's not my proposal I updated it to match the current aussie
guidelines. Please vote for it if you are in favour of this tag so we can get
4WD Only tacked on the end of road ways.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/4WD_Only
Australian Tagging
On Thu, 6 Aug 2009, Matt White wrote:
Anyway, thanks for kicking it off again, and I was going to say that I
give it 6 hours before some dickhead goes but what about my Lamborghini
- that's 4WD, but I noticed it's already happened on the main list...
mapping by committee at it's finest.
the
Liz wrote:
On Thu, 6 Aug 2009, Matt White wrote:
Anyway, thanks for kicking it off again, and I was going to say that I
give it 6 hours before some dickhead goes but what about my Lamborghini
- that's 4WD, but I noticed it's already happened on the main list...
mapping by committee at
is not one which is
based in reality. Lets just do our own thing and nuts to the rest of the world.
- Original Message -
From: Matt White mattwh...@iinet.com.au
Date: Thursday, August 6, 2009 9:37 pm
Subject: Re: [talk-au] 4wd_only
To: Liz ed...@billiau.net
Cc: talk-au@openstreetmap.org
Liz
--- On Thu, 6/8/09, Matt White mattwh...@iinet.com.au wrote:
Anyway, thanks for kicking it off again, and I was going to
say that I give it 6 hours before some dickhead goes but
what about my Lamborghini - that's 4WD, but I noticed it's
already happened on the main list... mapping by
--- On Thu, 6/8/09, b.schulz...@scu.edu.au b.schulz...@scu.edu.au wrote:
Meh, who cares. What we're
essentially doing here is forking OSM, just while still
using their database. Why do all the Australian mapping
guidelines need to be global? So long as what we tag ends up
being consistent
On Wed, 5 Aug 2009, John Smith wrote:
While it's not my proposal I updated it to match the current aussie
guidelines. Please vote for it if you are in favour of this tag so we can
get 4WD Only tacked on the end of road ways.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/4WD_Only
. Is somebody from Vic able to confirm/deny this?
Otherwise 4wd_only=yes could mean any road which is signposted as 4wd_only,
regardless of legality.
- Original Message -
From: John Smith delta_foxt...@yahoo.com
Date: Wednesday, August 5, 2009 4:06 pm
Subject: [talk-au] 4wd_only
To: talk-au
20 matches
Mail list logo
