Re: [talk-au] Buildings

No. But when I do buildings, it's almost always as part of a larger compound of some sort. So a I might tag a whole area as a school or tafe, retail centre or church, then tag the buldings inside them as just building. If I was doing stand-alone buildings I would be more likely to tag them

[talk-au] Buildings

I know this was a pet topic of Steve, the wiki page for buildings suggests building:use=* for the use but has anyone tagging buildings with anything other than building=yes? ___ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org

Re: [talk-au] Buildings

Once I marked a pavillion as building=pavillion, but I'm over that phase now. - Ben. Sent from my HTC -Original Message- From: John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com Sent: Sunday, 13 June 2010 17:56 To: OSM Australian Talk List talk-au@openstreetmap.org Subject: [talk-au] Buildings I

Re: [talk-au] Buildings

On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 5:56 PM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote: I know this was a pet topic of Steve, the wiki page for buildings suggests building:use=* for the use but has anyone tagging buildings with anything other than building=yes? http://osmdoc.com/en/tag/building/#values

Re: [talk-au] Buildings

On 14 June 2010 14:57, Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote: http://osmdoc.com/en/tag/building/#values shows lots of esoteric values. I don't know what people expect building=university to mean or do. Building:use gets some love: http://osmdoc.com/en/tag/building:use/#values Looks like