Re: [talk-au] Cycle tags on motorways

2022-08-18 Thread Ian Sergeant
On Thu, 18 Aug 2022 at 18:33, stevea wrote: > In the case of cycleway=lane, that IS paint, and I (and many others) map > these all the time. I see nothing wrong with “mapping paint” like this. > > As long as it's not a separate way. Paint can form a lane, but there should be no indication that

Re: [talk-au] Cycle tags on motorways

2022-08-18 Thread stevea
On Aug 18, 2022, at 12:42 AM, Michael Collinson wrote: > Purely as a question: Is there a case for actually mapping the whole cycleway > separately as a cycleway? As a cyclist, I like to see what I have in store. > Argument for: Well, that is what it is, a dual use cycleway and hard >

Re: [talk-au] Cycle tags on motorways

2022-08-18 Thread Michael Collinson
Purely as a question: Is there a case for actually mapping the whole cycleway separately as a cycleway? As a cyclist, I like to see what I have in store. Argument for: Well, that is what it is, a dual use cycleway and hard shoulder. And I guess main argument against: Ah, but it is not

Re: [talk-au] Cycle tags on motorways

2022-08-18 Thread Graeme Fitzpatrick
On Thu, 18 Aug 2022 at 16:58, Andrew Harvey wrote: > > I would probably not model that way, the onramp should merge much sooner > with the motorway and that should be good enough, unless you start mapping > paint on the road. > So you reckon take out the bike crossing altogether, & the "two"

Re: [talk-au] Cycle tags on motorways

2022-08-18 Thread Andrew Harvey
On Thu, 18 Aug 2022 at 16:49, Graeme Fitzpatrick wrote: > > > > On Thu, 18 Aug 2022 at 13:17, Andrew Harvey > wrote: > >> >> We should explicitly tag every motorway with bicycle=yes/no because some >> motorways allow bicycles and others forbid them. >> > > & then you get situations like this: >

Re: [talk-au] Cycle tags on motorways

2022-08-18 Thread Graeme Fitzpatrick
On Thu, 18 Aug 2022 at 13:17, Andrew Harvey wrote: > > We should explicitly tag every motorway with bicycle=yes/no because some > motorways allow bicycles and others forbid them. > & then you get situations like this:

Re: [talk-au] Cycle tags on motorways

2022-08-17 Thread stevea
On Aug 17, 2022, at 8:12 PM, Andrew Harvey wrote: > On Thu, 18 Aug 2022 at 12:26, Little Maps wrote: > Hi folks, is there any consensus on how to tag cycling on motorway shoulders? > > In some places, the simple tag bicycle=yes (or no) is used. > > We should explicitly tag every motorway with

Re: [talk-au] Cycle tags on motorways

2022-08-17 Thread Andrew Harvey
On Thu, 18 Aug 2022 at 12:26, Little Maps wrote: > Hi folks, is there any consensus on how to tag cycling on motorway > shoulders? > > In some places, the simple tag bicycle=yes (or no) is used. > We should explicitly tag every motorway with bicycle=yes/no because some motorways allow bicycles

Re: [talk-au] Cycle tags on motorways

2022-08-17 Thread stevea
On Aug 17, 2022, at 7:23 PM, Little Maps wrote: > Hi folks, is there any consensus on how to tag cycling on motorway shoulders? > > In some places, the simple tag bicycle=yes (or no) is used. This is straight > forward. In others, the left hand shoulder is tagged as a cycle lane, using >

[talk-au] Cycle tags on motorways

2022-08-17 Thread Little Maps
Hi folks, is there any consensus on how to tag cycling on motorway shoulders? In some places, the simple tag bicycle=yes (or no) is used. This is straight forward. In others, the left hand shoulder is tagged as a cycle lane, using "cycleway=lane" or "cycleway:left=lane". Others have used